Scaeosopha percnaula Meyrick, 1914
publication ID |
1175-5326 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5252985 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1820F42A-A72A-FFAC-BAAF-FF06FF419DA3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Scaeosopha percnaula Meyrick, 1914 |
status |
|
Scaeosopha percnaula Meyrick, 1914 View in CoL
( Figs. 3, 6, 7, 31)
Scaeosopha percnaula Meyrick, 1914: 254 View in CoL ; Meyrick, 1922: 50; Meyrick, 1930: 730; Gaede, 1938: 92; Clarke, 1965: 530; Sinev, 2002: 37.
Scaeosopha stagnigera Meyrick, 1932: 277 View in CoL , syn. nov.
Description. Adult ( Fig. 6): Wingspan 17.0–23.0 mm.
Type material. Lectotype ♂, INDIA: Shillong , Assam, [coll.] R[?], iii.[18]93, genitalia slide no. JFGC7762 ( BMNH, London) [examined].
Paralectotype: 1 ♀, INDIA: Khasi, Hills , Assam, 9.1906 ( BMNH, London) [examined] .
Scaeosopha stagnigera Meyrick, 1932 : Lectotype ♂, INDIA: Mahableshwar , Bombay, 17.v.[19]30, coll. R. M[axwell], genitalia slide no. JFGC7765 ( BMNH, London) [examined]. Paralectotype: 1 ♀, INDIA: Mahableshwar, Bombay, 16.v.[19]31 ( BMNH, London) [examined].
Distribution. India.
Diagnosis. This species resembles S. sinevi Ponomarenko et Park in the male genitalia, but can be separated from it by the process of the uncus brachium located more distally and acute apically, and the saccular margin of the valva slightly concave near the base ( Fig. 3). In S. sinevi , the process of the uncus brachium arises near the middle and is narrowly rounded apically, and the saccular margin of the valva is almost straight ( Fig. 32).
The wing pattern, the stout brachia of the uncus and the irregularly oval valva are very similar in S. percnaula and S. stagnigera . Besides differences in size (with wingspan 21.0–23.0 mm in S. percnaula and 17.0 mm in S. stagnigera ), there are no external differences. In the male genitalia the only tiny difference is the apex of the anellus acuminate in S. percnaula ( Fig. 3) but slightly rounded in S. stagnigera ( Fig. 31). Scaeosopha stagnigera should be a geographic variation of S. percnaula is therefore considered as a junior synonym of S. percnaula herein.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Scaeosopha percnaula Meyrick, 1914
Li, Houhun, Zhang, Zhiwei & Sinev, Sergey Yu. 2012 |
Scaeosopha percnaula
Sinev, S. Y. 2002: 37 |
Clarke, J. F. G. 1965: 530 |
Gaede, M. 1938: 92 |
Meyrick, E. 1922: 50 |
Meyrick, E. 1914: 254 |