Symmachia hetaerina hesione Stichel, 1910
, stat. rev.
( Fig. 25-28
View Figures 5-38
, 50)
Symmachia hetaerina Hewitson, 1867
was decribed based on a female from the state of Pará, Brazil. Stichel (1910) described
S. hesione
as a valid species, based on a male from the municipality of Fonte Boa, Amazonas, Brazil, and subsequently placed it as a subspecies of
S. hetaerina ( Stichel 1911)
, but the two names were synonymized by Callaghan and Lamas (2004). We have examined specimens from Pará, Acre and Mato Grosso ( Brazil) and found the two phenotypes to be consistently different (see below) and confined to distinct geographic regions. Since the male genitalia vary greatly among species of
Symmachia
, and there are only slight differences between the male genitalia of the two taxa, and we have not found them to be sympatric, we believe that the two taxa probably correspond to the same species, in a conservative approach. We therefore remove
S. hesione
from synonymy with
S. hetaerina
and place it again as a subspecies of that species:
Symmachia hetaerina hesione Stichel, 1910
, stat. rev. ( Fig. 25-26
View Figures 5-38
).
Symmachia hetaerina hetaerina
occurs in the southern and eastern portion of Amazonia and
S. hetaerina hesione
occurs in the middle-west portion of Amazonia.
The following male wing pattern characters serve to diagnose the two taxa. Forewing: dorsal surface – a) small costal sub-triangular spot with pale yellow coloration located after the costal curvature, anteriorly limited by the costal margin and posteriorly reaching 2/3 of the discal cell’s final width, present in
S. haeterina hesione
( Fig. 25
View Figures 5-38
) and absent in
S. h. hetaerina
( Fig. 23
View Figures 5-38
); b) marginal subrectangular orange spot, bigger in
S. hetaerina hesione
( Fig. 25
View Figures 5-38
) anteriorly reaching M 2 and posteriorly reaching half of the space in CuA 1 -CuA 2, smaller and pale white in
S. h. hetaerina
( Fig. 23
View Figures 5-38
); c) posterior median spot, orange in
S. hetaerina hesione
( Fig. 25
View Figures 5-38
), occupying 3/5 of the anal margin while half the width and pale white in
S. h. hetaerina
( Fig. 23
View Figures 5-38
). Ventral surface – d) costal spot begins on the costal margin and reaches 2/3 of the final width of the discal cell in
S. hetaerina hesione
( Fig. 26
View Figures 5-38
) while smaller and not beginning on the costal margin in
S. hetaerina hetaerina
( Fig. 24
View Figures 5-38
); e) small spot that posteriorly borders the basal portion of Sc smaller in
S. hetaerina hesione
( Fig. 26
View Figures 5-38
); other spots as mentioned for the dorsal surface, but pale orange in
S. hetaerina hesione
( Fig. 26
View Figures 5-38
). Hindwing: dorsal surface – f) orange median spot 1.5 times larger in
S. hetaerina hesione
( Fig. 25
View Figures 5-38
) while smaller and pale white in
S. h. hetaerina
( Fig. 23
View Figures 5-38
); g) wihtish yellow marking along the anal margin of
S. haeterina hesione
. Ventral surface – h) median spot limited to M 3 in
S. hetaerina hesione
( Fig. 25
View Figures 5-38
) while reaching the anal margin in
S. h. hetaerina
( Fig. 23
View Figures 5-38
) and h) marginal spot in cell CuA 2 -2A around three times larger in
S. h. hetaerina
( Fig. 23
View Figures 5-38
).
The females have more elongate wings than the males in both subspecies, with wing pattern resembling that of the respective male. The female of
S. h. hetaerina
has markings of the same color as the male, while
S. hetaerina hesione
differs by having yellow spots instead of orange ( Fig. 27-28
View Figures 5-38
).
This species was the most common
Symmachia
at PNSD, with eight captured individuals, all of them flying fast and landing on the adaxial surface of the leaves of small trees, about three meters above the ground after 14:00h.