Eucnemidae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4147.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C59A12A3-4AEC-4B81-B494-D9B9B26BA437 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6087019 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/14528791-FFBD-F333-FF17-494485DBDFDE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eucnemidae |
status |
|
Eucnemidae View in CoL View at ENA ? Genus and species 3
( Figs. 17–18 View FIGURES 17 – 20 )
Description. A small specimen comprising head, prothorax, elytra and parts of abdomen. Length 3.3 mm, width at base of pronotum 1.25 mm. Head broadly triangular but otherwise indistinct. Pronotum trapezoid in outline; anterior margin straight, anterolateral angles blunt, sides straight and slightly diverging posteriad; posterolateral angles acute, shortly produced, no carina indicated; basal margin gently arcuate; surface smooth, not distinctly punctate or granulate. Scutellar shield indiscernible. Elytra subtriangular, with acute apex; flat, intervals not apparently raised; 9 striae of large subquadrate punctures visible on disc. Metaventrite apparently smooth. Legs not preserved. Abdominal ventrites also smooth; sutures straight and equal in thickness (suggesting fusion of ventrites 4 and 5).
Material examined (1 specimen). Part (AM F. 141620) consisting of cuticular remains of head, prothorax and elytra and impression of abdomen; counterpart (AM F. 141621) comprising cuticular remains of abdomen and impression of head, prothorax and elytra. Talbragar Fish Bed ( Upper Jurassic : Kimmeridgian-Tithonian, 151 ±4 Ma), Gulgong, N.S.W., Australia, December 2015, coll. R. G. Beattie. Deposited in the Australian Museum, Sydney.
Remarks. The specimen differs from the holotype of Beattieellus jurassicus in its smaller size, different body dimensions (length-width ratio 2.64:1; 3.03: 1 in B. jurassicus ) and the anteriorly truncate prothorax (rounded in B. jurassicus ). The apparent absence of a carina on the posterolateral pronotal angles and fusion of the last two ventrites suggest that it may also be a eucnemid, but it is not well enough preserved to allow an unambiguous family assignment and it does not warrant a formal description and name.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.