Parhypochthonius Berlese
publication ID |
ORI111 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0DC6B575-3CB3-41C1-A3EC-850520AE4487 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285250 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/113913BF-772C-0E81-6887-5BFC123FE5B8 |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
Parhypochthonius Berlese |
status |
|
Parhypochthonius Berlese View in CoL , 1904
Parhypochthonius Berlese, 1904b, p. 25: 1910, p. 218: 1913a, p. 7 1).
Berlese published the diagnosis of Parhypochthonius together with the description of the type-species ( P. aphidinus ). In 1910 (p. 219) he added two species to the genus, of which in my opinion one ( urticinus ) indeed belongs to it, whilst the other ( acarinus ) has become the type of the genus Aphelacarus ( Palaeacaroidea ) 2).
1) In the original diagnosis, the generic name is spelt as Parhypochthonius , but on the same page the type-species is named Parypochthonius aphidinus . The same difference in spelling is found in Berlese's 1910 paper; here the spelling Parhypochthonius is found in the key, Parypochthonius in the description of two species.
2) Schweizer (1956, pp. 219-221, figs. 126-130) described five "new" species as representatives of Parhypochthonius ; these are, however, nymphs and larvae of higher Oribatid mites ( Trichoribates , Ceratozetes , Scheloribates , Sphaerozetes or Chamobates ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |