Cryptosporidium
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2015.12.001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/111387C3-FFBA-382C-4B5A-FADBFC9F399E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cryptosporidium |
status |
|
3.4. Cryptosporidium View in CoL in amphibians and reptiles
Little is known about Cryptosporidium species infecting amphibians. Of the three orders of amphibians; Anura , Caudata and Gymnophonia, Cryptosporidium has been only reported in Anura which includes frogs and toads and only one species, C. fragile is recognised ( Table 5) (Jirk̊ u et al., 2008). In transmission experiments, C. fragile was not infective in one fish species ( Poecilia reticulate ), four amphibian species ( Bufo bufo , Rana temporaria , Litoria caerulea and Xenopus laevis ), one species of reptile ( Pantherophis guttatus ) and SCID mice (Jirkůet al., 2008). This species has not been reported in humans.
Cryptosporidium View in CoL infections are ubiquitous in reptiles and have been reported in more than 57 reptilian species (O'Donoghue,1995; Ryan and Xiao, 2014). Unlike in other animals in which Cryptosporidium View in CoL infection is usually self-limiting in immunocompetent individuals, cryptosporidiosis in reptiles is frequently chronic and sometimes lethal in some snakes. Both intestinal and gastric cryptosporidiosis has been described in snakes and lizards. To date, two species are recognised; C. serpentis View in CoL (gastric) and C. varanii View in CoL ( C. saurophilum View in CoL ) (intestinal) ( Levine, 1980; Pavlasek et al., 1995; Koudela and Modry, 1998; Pavĺasek and Ryan, 2008); neither of which have been reported in humans, but C. serpentis View in CoL has been identified in cattle ( Azami et al., 2007; Chen and Qiu, 2012). A new intestinal species, Cryptosporidium ducismarci (tortoise genotype II) has been reported in several species of tortoises, snakes and lizards ( Traversa, 2010). Because only molecular data are presented, this species is regarded as a nomen nudum, pending the support of morphological and biological data.
C. parvum View in CoL , C. muris View in CoL and Cryptosporidium tyzzeri View in CoL are also commonly reported in reptiles, particularly snakes but this is thought to be due to mechanical transmission due to predation of infected rodents and is not thought to present a substantial zoonotic risk (Morgan et al., 1999; Xiao et al., 2004b; Pedraza-Diaz et al., 2009; Díaz et al., 2013; da Silva et al., 2014). In addition, various host-adapted genotypes have been identified including tortoise genotype I and snake genotypes I and II (cf. Ryan and Xiao, 2014), which have not been reported in humans ( Table 5) ( Xiao et al., 2004b; Pedraza-Diaz et al., 2009; Traversa, 2010; Seva Ada et al., 2011; Richter et al., 2011; Rinaldi et al., 2012; da Silva et al., 2014; Abe and Matsubara, 2015). There is also a single report of avian genotype V from green iguanas ( Iguana inguana ) ( Kik et al., 2011).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cryptosporidium
Zahedi, Alireza, Paparini, Andrea, Jian, Fuchun, Robertson, Ian & Ryan, Una 2016 |
Cryptosporidium ducismarci
Traversa 2010 |
C. saurophilum
Koudela & Modry 1998 |
C. varanii
Pavlasek, Lavickova, Horak, Kral & Kral 1995 |
C. serpentis
Levine 1980 |
C. serpentis
Levine 1980 |
Cryptosporidium tyzzeri
Tyzzer 1912 |