Iteaphilidae, Sinclair & Shamshev, 2021

Sinclair, Bradley J. & Shamshev, Igor V., 2021, World revision of Iteaphila with unbranched radial vein (Diptera: Empidoidea: Iteaphilidae), Zootaxa 4968 (1), pp. 1-89 : 12

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4968.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09F4CC3C-879C-4FCD-94D5-9ADE4A81EFAC

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4814422

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0E6887D4-FFBA-FF94-4EBC-FF5CFA00B154

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Iteaphilidae
status

stat. nov.

Key to genera and species groups (males only) of Iteaphilidae View in CoL

1 Postpedicel with broad base, with apical half tapered; stylus comprises two articles, shorter or longer than half length of postpedicel with apical sensillum greatly reduced in length; scutellum with 2–3 pairs of apical setae; male hind femur usually modified; wing with basal costa seta present; cell dm produced apically ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8–10 ); male terminalia with epandrial lobe ventral to distinctly digitiform surstylus........................................................ Paraiteaphila gen. nov.

- Postpedicel elongate and nearly parallel-sided; stylus usually short and quadrate, one-articled with distinct apical sensillum; scutellum with more than 3 pairs of apical setae; male legs unmodified; basal costal seta absent; cell dm usually truncate apically ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 5–7 , 8 View FIGURES 8–10 , 11 View FIGURES 11–14 ); male terminalia without epandrial lobe; surstylus hook-like.......... Iteaphila View in CoL ................ 2

2 Epandrial bridge broad, at least one-quarter length of epandrium ( Figs 21–24 View FIGURES 21–25 )................. I. bulbosa View in CoL species group

- Epandrial bridge narrow, less than one-quarter length of epandrium.............................................. 3

3 Phallus elongate, extending beyond and around epandrium ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 5–7 , 36 View FIGURES 36–40 )...................... I. nitidula View in CoL species group

- Phallus shorter, extending little beyond epandrium........................................................... 4

4 Phallic guide with jagged margin; postgonite usually extended to dorsal margin of epandrium ( Figs 37, 38 View FIGURES 36–40 , 41–48 View FIGURES 41–44 View FIGURES 45–48 , 53–58 View FIGURES 53–57 View FIGURES 58–61 ).................................................................................... I. nupta View in CoL species group

- Phallic guide without jagged margin; postgonite not extended to dorsal margin of epandrium......................... 5

5 Apex of phallus greatly expanded into funnel or cup-shape ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 8–10 , 77, 78 View FIGURES 75–78 )..................... I. stentor View in CoL species group

- Apex of phallus not expanded........................................................................... 6

6 Hypoproct without paired processes................................................. I. triangula View in CoL species group

- Hypoproct with paired processes......................................................................... 7

7 Phallus with recurved apex; phallic guide without spine-like microtrichia; shaft of phallus without internal skeleton pattern ( Figs 59–61 View FIGURES 58–61 , 67–70 View FIGURES 66–70 , 75 View FIGURES 75–78 )............................................................ I. oedalina View in CoL species group

- Phallus with straight or gently curved apex; phallic guide often with spine-like microtrichia; shaft of phallus often with internal skeleton pattern ( Figs 29–32 View FIGURES 29–32 )...................................................... I. macquarti View in CoL species group

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Iteaphilidae

Genus

Paraiteaphila

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF