Iteaphilidae, Sinclair & Shamshev, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4968.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09F4CC3C-879C-4FCD-94D5-9ADE4A81EFAC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4814422 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0E6887D4-FFBA-FF94-4EBC-FF5CFA00B154 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Iteaphilidae |
status |
stat. nov. |
Key to genera and species groups (males only) of Iteaphilidae View in CoL
1 Postpedicel with broad base, with apical half tapered; stylus comprises two articles, shorter or longer than half length of postpedicel with apical sensillum greatly reduced in length; scutellum with 2–3 pairs of apical setae; male hind femur usually modified; wing with basal costa seta present; cell dm produced apically ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8–10 ); male terminalia with epandrial lobe ventral to distinctly digitiform surstylus........................................................ Paraiteaphila gen. nov.
- Postpedicel elongate and nearly parallel-sided; stylus usually short and quadrate, one-articled with distinct apical sensillum; scutellum with more than 3 pairs of apical setae; male legs unmodified; basal costal seta absent; cell dm usually truncate apically ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 5–7 , 8 View FIGURES 8–10 , 11 View FIGURES 11–14 ); male terminalia without epandrial lobe; surstylus hook-like.......... Iteaphila View in CoL ................ 2
2 Epandrial bridge broad, at least one-quarter length of epandrium ( Figs 21–24 View FIGURES 21–25 )................. I. bulbosa View in CoL species group
- Epandrial bridge narrow, less than one-quarter length of epandrium.............................................. 3
3 Phallus elongate, extending beyond and around epandrium ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 5–7 , 36 View FIGURES 36–40 )...................... I. nitidula View in CoL species group
- Phallus shorter, extending little beyond epandrium........................................................... 4
4 Phallic guide with jagged margin; postgonite usually extended to dorsal margin of epandrium ( Figs 37, 38 View FIGURES 36–40 , 41–48 View FIGURES 41–44 View FIGURES 45–48 , 53–58 View FIGURES 53–57 View FIGURES 58–61 ).................................................................................... I. nupta View in CoL species group
- Phallic guide without jagged margin; postgonite not extended to dorsal margin of epandrium......................... 5
5 Apex of phallus greatly expanded into funnel or cup-shape ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 8–10 , 77, 78 View FIGURES 75–78 )..................... I. stentor View in CoL species group
- Apex of phallus not expanded........................................................................... 6
6 Hypoproct without paired processes................................................. I. triangula View in CoL species group
- Hypoproct with paired processes......................................................................... 7
7 Phallus with recurved apex; phallic guide without spine-like microtrichia; shaft of phallus without internal skeleton pattern ( Figs 59–61 View FIGURES 58–61 , 67–70 View FIGURES 66–70 , 75 View FIGURES 75–78 )............................................................ I. oedalina View in CoL species group
- Phallus with straight or gently curved apex; phallic guide often with spine-like microtrichia; shaft of phallus often with internal skeleton pattern ( Figs 29–32 View FIGURES 29–32 )...................................................... I. macquarti View in CoL species group
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |