Actinopus reycali Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018

Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020, Taxonomic Revision of the Spider Genus Actinopus Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Actinopodidae), Megataxa 2 (1), pp. 1-256 : 113-115

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5655609
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0975136A-FFFD-CE2F-FCD5-F805DF193D8E
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Actinopus reycali Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018
status

Treatment

Actinopus reycali Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL

Actinopus reycali Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 View in CoL : figs 6 A–G, 7 A–E (holotype ♂, [24º 42’ S 64º 37’ W], Parque Nacional “El Rey”, Salta, Argentina, 10.xi.1976, M. Rumboll leg., MACN-Ar 36518; paratype ♀, same locality of holotype, i.1981, Grosso & P. Goloboff leg., MACN-Ar 36519; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.

Diagnosis. Males of A. reycali ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 6 D–F) resemble those of A. harveyi ( Fig. 78 View FIGURE 78 A–C), A. itapitocai ( Fig. 83 View FIGURE 83 A–C), A. itaqui ( Fig. 91 View FIGURE 91 A–C), A. xingu ( Fig. 94 View FIGURE 94 A–C), A. caxiuana ( Fig. 100 View FIGURE 100 A–C) and A. utinga ( Fig. 103 View FIGURE 103 A–C) by the general shape of the copulatory bulb, but males differ from those of the more elongated copulatory bulb. They differ from those of A. utinga by the embolus being thinner and PA continuous to PAc. In the disposition of keels, the copulatory bulb resembles A. rufipes ( Fig. 72 View FIGURE 72 A–C), A. harveyi and A. utinga , but males differ from those of PA not continuous to PI. Males resemble those of all other species of the group nattereri , except A. nattereri ( Fig. 67 View FIGURE 67 A–C), A. vilhena ( Fig. 75 View FIGURE 75 A–C), A. harveyi , A. itapitocai ( Fig. 83 View FIGURE 83 A–C), A. xingu and A. utinga by BTA located medially on width of tegulum.

Description. See Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff (2018: 17).

Distribution. ARGENTINA: Jujuy and Salta.

Actinopus septemtrionalis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018

Actinopus septemtrionalis Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018 : figs 8 A–I, 9 A–E, 43 (holotype ♂, [26º 36’ S 65º 12’ W], El Cadillal GoogleMaps , Tucumán, Argentina, 25.v.1983, P. Goloboff leg., MACN-Ar 36501; paratype ♀, same data as holotype, MACN-Ar 36052; not examined); World Spider Catalog, 2020.

Diagnosis. Males of A. septemtrionalis ( Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 8 G–I) resemble A. clavero (Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 4 E–G) by the elongated shape of the copulatory bulb, but males differ by the more developed PA, PA continuous to PAc and a wider angle of embolar curvature. Females of A. septemtrionalis (Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff, 2018, fig. 9 D–E) have unilobate receptacles and differ from those of all other species by having the receptacles much more longer than wide (two or more times).

Description. See Ríos-Tamayo & Goloboff (2018: 21).

Distribution. ARGENTINA: Salta, Tucumán, Catarmarca and Formosa.