Castor, WITH
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00467.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5492403 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/080B87D1-E138-AA53-FF26-FB3CFC206D0B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Castor |
status |
|
COMPARISON OF CASTOR WITH View in CoL FOSSIL BEAVERS
The size range from juvenile to fully grown individuals is about 5.7 mm for incisor length in recent Castor : this is equivalent to about 57% of the maxl of the incisor ( Table 1). For the length of the upper incisor of A. suevicus , the range is 7.9 mm, which is equivalent to nearly 57% of the maxl of the tooth. This is very similar to modern Castor , and thus the observed size differences in the small sample of fossil teeth of A. suevicus can well be attributed to postnatal growth, as suggested by Stefen & Mörs (2008).
The range of the length of upper incisors differs between these two species: about 55% maxl in Castor , and about 44% in Anchitheriomys ( Fig. 2, Table 1). The range in length of upper and lower incisors together is 62% maxl of the incisor in S. eseri , which is even larger than in modern Castor . The few studied specimens of the larger capybara ( H. hydrochaeris ) show a range in the length of upper and lower incisors of over 80% of maxl.
The size ranges of mandibular tooth rows for different fossil beavers and C. fiber are illustrated in Figure 3. For all of the species studied, a noticeable variation in tooth row length can be observed: about 11 mm (30% maxl) in C. fiber , 11.8 mm (30% maxl) in A. suevicus , and 60 mm (71% maxl) in H. hydrochaeris . For the samples of the early Miocene S. eseri and S. castorinus studied, the range of the mandibular tooth row is around 4 mm and 17% of maxl. In all species, the low size ranges were observed in m1/2 and M1/2 lengths and widths, respectively.
In recent Castor , no pattern in the form and distribution of enamel folds and islands on the chewing surface, which could be used as clear age indicators, were recognizable ( Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ). There are only a few features, like the closing of the para-, meso-, or metafossette, and, at the latest, hypofossette, that can be easily determined.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.