Messapus meridionalis, Haddad, Charles R. & Mbo, Zingisile, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4057.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C0C9AD36-9562-4068-9728-4E1BD31755CE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6105474 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/046A8790-FFB8-FF98-FF49-7B135720F98E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Messapus meridionalis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Messapus meridionalis View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 6 View FIGURES 3 – 10 , 33 View FIGURES 32 – 40 , 45, 46 View FIGURES 45 – 50
Type material. Holotype ♀: SOUTH AFRICA: KwaZulu-Natal: Oribi Gorge Nature Reserve, Samango waterfall trail, 30°42.612'S, 30°16.182'E, leg. C. Haddad, 200 m a.s.l., 13.I.2011 (canopy fogging) (NCA 2014/1856).
Etymology. From Latin for southern ( meridionalis ), referring to its distribution as the southernmost species in the genus.
Diagnosis. Similar to females of M. martini , females of M. meridionalis sp. n. possess horse-shoe shaped epigynal ridges and copulatory openings that are situated anteriorly. Medially, the epigynal ridges of M. martini extend half the length of the epigyne ( Haddad 2013: fig. 34), while those of M. meridionalis sp. n. extend to the posterior margin ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45 – 50 ). The spermathecae of M. martini are oblique ( Haddad 2013: fig. 35), while those of M. meridionalis sp. n. are longitudinal ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45 – 50 ). Male unknown.
Female (holotype, Oribi Gorge, NCA 2014/1856). Measurements: CL 3.85, CW 3.30, AL 4.40, AW 2.30, TL 8.40, FL 0.35, SL 1.70, SW 1.90, CH 0.13, AME–AME 0.14, AME–ALE 0.03, ALE–ALE 0.73, PME–PME 0.23, PME–PLE 0.21, PLE–PLE 1.03, PERW 1.32, MOQAW 0.68, MOQPW 0.67, MOQL 0.76.
Length of leg segments (sequence from femur to tarsus, and total): I 3.30 + 1.60 + 2.20 + 2.45 + 1.55 = 11.10; II 2.80 + 1.45 + 2.25 + 2.45 + 1.50 = 10.45; III 3.30 + 1.35 + 2.50 + 3.10 + 1.50 = 11.75; IV missing.
General appearance as in Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3 – 10 . Carapace yellow medially, with light brown markings with black FS mediolaterally, creamy-yellow laterally; eye region generally black, cream between posterior eyes. All eyes surrounded by black rings; clypeus height equal to distance 0.44 times AME diameter; AER slightly procurved; AME larger than ALE; AME separated by distance slightly less than half their diameter; AME separated from ALE by distance 0.11 times AME diameter; PER slightly procurved; PME slightly larger than PLE; PME separated by distance equal to their diameter; PME separated from PLE by distance 0.87 times PME diameter. Chelicerae orange-brown, with dark brown setae on paturon; CPPM absent; promargin with three teeth, median largest, distal smallest; median and distal teeth adjacent, median and proximal teeth widely separated; retromargin with two widely separated teeth, distal tooth slightly larger. Endites and labium creamy-yellow, paler distally; endites with distinct serrula; sternum shield-shaped, broader than long, with scattered light brown setae. Legs cream, with faint mottled markings comprising black FS from femora to metatarsi. Leg spination (leg IV missing): femora: I pl 2 do 3, II pl 1-2 do 3 rl 0-1, III pl 2-3 do 3 rl 1-2; tibiae: I pl 0-1 plv 3 rlv 3, II pl 2 plv 2 rlv 3, III pl 2 do 2 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 2; metatarsi: I plv 2 rlv 2 vt 2, II pl 1 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 2, III pl 1 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 3. Palpal spination: femora: pl 1 do 2; patellae: pl 1 do 1; tibiae: pl 1 plv 3; tarsi: pl 1 plv 1. Abdomen cream dorsally, densely covered in dark grey FS, sparser medially in anterior half; venter cream, with less dense FS and scattered short straight setae. Epigyne with horse-shoe shaped epigynal ridges, with median ridge extending to posterior; copulatory openings situated anteriorly in epigynal ridges ( Figs 33 View FIGURES 32 – 40 , 45 View FIGURES 45 – 50 ); spermathecae fused medially, longitudinal, with broad lateral lobes ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45 – 50 ).
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 55 View FIGURE 55 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |