Acanthacris ruficornis ruficornis (Fabricius, 1787)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4189.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3C3C1242-82BC-4C73-B95E-0232F9603BA4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6057340 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FD87C1-FB4A-FFBD-C4FC-FD3CFA71D279 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acanthacris ruficornis ruficornis (Fabricius, 1787) |
status |
|
Acanthacris ruficornis ruficornis (Fabricius, 1787)
http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera .speciesfile.org:TaxonName:50244
Material examined. ETHIOPIA: SNNPR, Bench Maji, Sheko Forest (1340 m), 16.IV.2015, B. Massa (1♀, BMPC) ; Bench Maji, Sheko Forest (1570 m), 13.IV.2015, R.P.W.H. Felix (1Ƌ, RFPC) ; Oromia, Bale, Harenna Forest (1950 m), Bale Mountains N.P., 13.XII.2015, B. Massa (1♀, BMPC) .
Distribution. This subspecies is widespread in South, East and Central Africa. Ssp. ruficornis is known to occur in Ethiopia ( De Bormans 1881, Baccetti 1996, Donskoff 1977, Jago 1977).
Remarks. According to Mungai (1987) the distribution of ssp. ruficornis shows little overlap with ssp. citrina, which is supposed to be restricted to northwest Africa. We found both subspecies in Ethiopia, in the same kind of habitat, at two sites only a few km apart. Possibly the range of overlap is much larger than previously described. Both subspecies differ considerably from each other morphologically, and probably genetically, but are treated as ssp. by Mungai (1987) based on hybridization tests. Hybridization provides evidence of incomplete isolation during the speciation process. Following O’Brien and Mayr (1991) subspecies should be considered entities that occupy a particular geographical sector of species distribution, present a natural history and distinct genes from other subspecies. Thus, only a clearly isolated population may be considered taxonomically separated. Further study should reveal whether both subspecies should be given full species status, or that the morphological differences lie within the variability of the same taxon, or that our specimen from Ethiopia is in fact another taxon.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Acridoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Cyrtacanthacridinae |
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Acridoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Cyrtacanthacridinae |