Sphecodes gibbus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.729.1195 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2FA17849-A224-4B0B-8894-EDB6ECBE029B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5705451 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03FA8783-FFDE-FF81-B743-FBE5FAFFFC2E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sphecodes gibbus ( Linnaeus, 1758 ) |
status |
|
Sphecodes gibbus ( Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL
Figs 2E View Fig , 3I View Fig
Sphex gibba Linnaeus, 1758: 571 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , ♀ (type locality: Sweden). Apis glabra Füessly, 1775: 51 , ♀ (type locality: Switzerland). Andrena ferruginea Olivier, 1789: 139 , nom. nov. for Nomada gibba Fabricius, 1775 (nom. praeocc.,
nec Linnaeus, 1758). Apis gibbosa Christ, 1791: 177 , nom. nov. for Nomada gibba Fabricius, 1775 (nom. praeocc., nec
Linnaeus, 1758). Melitta sphecoides Kirby, 1802: 46 , ♀ (type locality: England). Melitta picea Kirby, 1802: 48 , ♂ (type locality: England). Andrena austriaca Fabricius, 1804: 325 View in CoL , ♀ (type locality: Denmark) (nom. praeocc., nec Panzer, 1798). Dichroa analis Illiger, 1806: 48 , nomen novum for Nomada gibba Fabricius, 1775 (nom. praeocc., nec
Linnaeus, 1758). Sphecodes apicatus Smith, 1853: 36 View in CoL , ♀ (syntypes: ♀, India, Simla; NHMUK). Synonymized by
Blüthgen 1927: 27. Sphecodes nigripennis Morawitz, 1876: 257 , ♀ (type locality: Kazakhstan). Sphecodes indicus Bingham, 1898: 123 View in CoL , pl. a, fig. 10, ♂. Syn. nov. Sphecodes sutor Nurse, 1903: 538 , ♀ (syntypes: ♀♀, India, Jammu and Kashmir; NHMUK).
Synonymized by Blüthgen 1927: 27. Sphecodes gibbus var. rufispinosus Meyer, 1920: 113 , ♀ (type locality: Spain). Sphecodes gibbus var. turkestanicus Meyer, 1920: 113 , ♀, ♂ (type locality: Uzbekistan, “Golodnaja
Steppe”; China: Jarkand, Xinjiang). Sphecodes castilianus Blüthgen, 1924: 473 , ♀ (type locality: Portugal). Sphecodes lustrans Cockerell, 1931b: 411 , ♂ (type locality: Morocco). Sphecodes angarensis Cockerell, 1937: 3–4 View in CoL , ♀ (type locality: Russia, Irkutsk Prov.). Sphecodes pergibbus Blüthgen, 1938: 50 , ♀, ♂ (type locality: Cyprus).
Sphecodes indicus View in CoL – Saini & Rathor 2012: 162. — Rajkumar & Dey 2016: 1841.
Sphecodes gibbus View in CoL – Ascher & Pickering 2020: map.
Diagnosis and descriptive notes
See Astafurova et al. (2018a: 17).
Material examined
INDIA • 1 ♂, holotype of Sphecodes indicus Bingham, 1898 ; “Type // Simla, 5. 97. // Sphecodes indicus (Bingh) // B.M.Type HYM 17a560”; NHMUK 013380329 About NHMUK • 1 ♀; Simla ; May 1898; C.G. Nurse leg.; NHMUK 013380335 About NHMUK .
Distribution
Himalayas: India (Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh); North Africa, Europe (north to 63° latitude), Russia (east to Yakutia), Turkey, Israel, Jordan, Caucasus, Kazakhstan, Central Asia, Iran, Mongolia, China (Xinjiang).
Remarks
The record of S. indicus from Mussoorie (Uttarakhand, India) by Saini & Rathor (2012: 162) is doubtful.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Halictini |
Genus |
Sphecodes gibbus ( Linnaeus, 1758 )
Astafurova, Yulia & Proshchalykin, Maxim 2020 |
Sphecodes indicus
Rajkumar M. B. & Dey D. 2016: 1841 |
Saini M. S. & Rathor V. S. 2012: 162 |