Haploblepharus fuscus Smith, 1950

Human, Brett A., 2007, A taxonomic revision of the catshark genus Haploblepharus Garman 1913 (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae), Zootaxa 1451, pp. 1-40 : 22-28

Haploblepharus fuscus Smith, 1950

( Fig. 7 , Table 3 )

Haploblepharus fuscus Smith, 1950: 883 .

Haploblepharus edwardsii: Günther, 1870: 401 (in part); Smith, 1949: 54 (in part).

Type Series and Locality. Holotype, RUSI 21, adolescent male 530 mm TL (measured as 495 mm TL in the current study), collected off East London, Eastern Cape, South Africa (by J. L. B. Smith?), approx. 33°00'S 27°55'E, from the shore “in shallow water among rocks” using hook and line, in good condition, although there is a large gash present on the dorsal midline of the head above gill slits 3 to 5, and there are a number of patches where the skin has been damaged, particularly on the right trunk, that may be due to poor preservation ( Fig. 7 ).

Paratype, missing presumed lost, possibly never catalogued, 680 mm TL male, collected from Knysna, Western Cape, South Africa (by J. L. B. Smith?), approx. 34°03'S 23°02.5'E, from the shore using hook and line.

Diagnosis. The largest member of the genus, H. fuscus has a relatively stocky body at all stages of maturity, particularly in mature individuals; abdomen width 11.0% TL for the holotype (mean 11.4% TL); snout rounded in the holotype, not coming to a point, becoming more broadly rounded in larger individuals, head width at the posterior margin of the orbit 12.0% TL in the holotype (mean 12.2% TL); head strongly depressed, head height at the posterior margin of the orbit 6.8% TL for the holotype (mean 6.1% TL); trunk depressed, trunk height 8.9% TL and trunk width 12.1% TL in the holotype (mean 8.7% TL and 12.2% TL, respectively); claspers of mature males stout, inner length 6.9 times the base in the holotype (mean inner length 4.3 times base). The holotype of H. fuscus has 84 rows of teeth in the upper jaw (mean 71.2) and 83 rows of teeth in the lower jaw (mean 74.7). The holotype of H. fuscus has a total of 134 (mean 134.8) vertebral centra. Haploblepharus fuscus always has a chocolate brown or dull brown background colouration, occasionally with indistinct saddles, and occasionally with white spots present, rarely with dark spots present.

Description. The morphometric and meristic data for H. fuscus are given in Table 3 . Holotype, adolescent male 495 mm TL (mean of all specimens examined in Table 3 , including the holotype, see Study material): H. fuscus is a stocky bodied Haploblepharus shark, although juveniles are slender, with a relatively broad head, head width at the pectoral origin 4.06 (3.91) times the preoral length; head length 1.24 (1.28) times distance from snout tip to first gill slit; height of first gill slit 1.86 (1.82) times the height of the fifth gill slit; eye length 5.67 (4.14) times longer than spiracle length; basimandibular cartilage found at the symphysis of the Meckels cartilage in the lower jaw; mouth length 1.33 (1.47) times the prenarial length; mouth width 8.5 (6.27) times the upper labial furrow length; labial cartilages present; nasal lobes fused into a nasal flap that covers the excurrent apertures and extends to the mouth; interorbital width 1.19 (1.15) times the nasal flap width; head strongly depressed, head width at the posterior margin of the orbit 1.76 (2.0) times its height; head width 1.44 (1.60) times its height; trunk strongly depressed, trunk width 1.36 (1.40) times its height; abdomen depressed, abdomen width 1.29 (1.18) times its height; tail not depressed, tail width equal to its height; caudal peduncle strongly compressed, caudal peduncle width 0.70 (0.57) times its height; precaudal length 1.86 (1.79) times the distance from snout to first dorsal fin; dorsal fins rounded; height of first dorsal fin 0.96 (1.08) times that of the second dorsal fin; first dorsal fin length equal to the length of its anterior margin; second dorsal fin length 1.08 (1.04) times the length of its anterior margin; pectoral fin to pelvic fin space 1.14 (1.28) times the interdorsal space; pectoral and pelvic fins rounded; pectoral fin height 2.18 (1.98) times the height of the pelvic fin; pectoral fin length 0.91 (0.90) times the length of its anterior margin; pelvic fin length 1.35 (1.36) times the length of its anterior margin; claspers of mature males stout, clasper inner length 6.89 (4.33) times the base; anal fin to caudal fin space 1.48 (1.42) times the head height at the origin of the pectoral fin; length of anal fin base 1.19 (1.29) the length of the second dorsal fin base; anal fin length 1.37 (1.43) times the length of its anterior margin; distance from pectoral fin insertion to the midpoint of the first dorsal fin length 1.52 (1.53) times the caudal dorsal margin length. Vertebral counts: total 134 (128–141), 34 (34–40) monospondylous, 60 (52–62) precaudal diplospondylous and 40 (35–48) caudal diplospondylous vertebrae. Dental formula: upper jaw (left) 40 (23–43), (right) 44 (23–49); lower jaw (left) 43 (23–46), (right) 40 (25–46). Spiral valve turns: NA (9).

Size and sexual maturity. Haploblepharus fuscus is the largest Haploblepharus shark, both in terms of overall size and mass. In this study, males were found to be juvenile at 438 mm TL to 460 mm TL, adolescent at 495 mm TL to 543 mm TL, and mature at 550 mm TL to 649 mm TL. Females were found to be adolescent at 496 mm TL to 568 mm TL, and mature at 609 mm TL to 631 mm TL, no female juveniles were available for examination. There appears to be no sexual dimorphism in H. fuscus .

Colouration. Haploblepharus fuscus is the least patterned of the Haploblepharus sharks ( Figs. 7 & 8 ). The holotype is a uniform chocolate brown, slightly paler ventrally, without saddles, spots, or any other markings ( Fig. 7 ). In other H. fuscus individuals, the background dorsal colouration is most often uniform chocolate brown or dull grey brown with no markings, although sometimes individuals have small inconspicuous black spots (rarely) or inconspicuous white spots ( Fig. 8 A), never both; saddles variably present and inconspicuous when present ( Fig. 8 B), more conspicuous in smaller specimens, centre of saddle more orange than background with darker margins anteriorly and posteriorly, colour in the centre of the saddle dull, number of saddles and position on body highly variable, usually between 2 to 4, although never on the head; one individual had white spots and indistinct saddles. No markings on any fins. Ventral colouration uniform white, off white, cream or paler than the background dorsal colouration, pectoral and pelvic fin webs darker, anal fin with dorsal background colour.

Comparison with other species. Haploblepharus fuscus is the least patterned of the Haploblepharus sharks. The head is bluntly rounded as in H. pictus , and the body is depressed more so than in H. edwardsii and H. kistnasamyi . Claspers of mature males are equivalent in size to H. kistnasamyi and H. pictus , although longer and stouter than in H. edwardsii . Haploblepharus fuscus has the highest total tooth count of the Haploblepharus sharks. Haploblepharus fuscus is most similar to H. pictus in overall morphology, and distinguished from that species by having indistinct saddles and spots, when present, with spots and saddles rarely occurring together, more vertebrae and fewer teeth rows. The colouration of H. fuscus is distinct from H. edwardsii and H. kistnasamyi (except possibly for the juveniles of the latter species, which can be distinguished from H. fuscus in possessing obvious saddles; see Fig. 13 ), however, H. fuscus has also been confused with H. pictus .

Remarks. Smith (1950) made his original description of H. fuscus from two males, one 530 mm TL from East London, Eastern Cape ( RUSI 21) and one 680 mm TL from Knysna, Western Cape. The only reference to the designation of a type specimen made by Smith was on the illustration of the 530 mm individual, to which he labelled “ type ”. This, in accordance to Articles 73.1.1 and 73.1.4 of the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999), establishes that individual ( RUSI 21) as the holotype. In accordance with Recommendation 73D (ICZN, 1999), the remaining specimen is a paratype of H. fuscus , however, from examination of the SAIAB collection catalogue, this specimen apparently no longer exists, and there are no specimens of H. fuscus in that collection with the locality of Knysna, suggesting that the paratype was never catalogued. Bass et al. (1975) and Springer (1979) refer to the two specimens described by Smith, but make no mention of the status of the paratype.

The only material examined by Springer (1979) for H. fuscus was SAM 24545, which he illustrated and gave morphometric data for. In the present study, this specimen was determined to be H. pictus , therefore the morphometric proportions given by Springer for H. fuscus are actually referable to H. pictus .

The dentition and denticles of H. fuscus are described and illustrated by Smith (1950), Bass et al. (1975), and Compagno (1984b). Bass et al. (1975) found no evidence of sexual heterodonty in H. fuscus , and found the teeth to be quite different to other Haploblepharus in being longer and narrower.

The juveniles of this species are scarce ( Bass et al., 1975; M. J. Smale, pers. comm.; current study), and there appears to be an unknown habitat that is used by H. fuscus for egg laying, and where juveniles spend that stage of their life history. Only two juvenile specimens could be found in the present study. RUSI 6079 is a juvenile male 460 mm TL, collected from Port Alfred, Eastern Cape (33°36’S 26°54’E), and SAM 32614 ( Fig. 8 B) is also a juvenile male 438 mm TL, collected from Langebaan Lagoon, Western Cape (Klein Oostervaal farm). Both of these juveniles are much larger than the juveniles of other members of the genus.

Haploblepharus fuscus is regularly caught by shore anglers, who often regard them as pests ( Compagno, 1984b; pers. obs.). This species is also occasionally used in aquaria, however, there is no directed fishery for this species for the aquarium trade at present (pers. obs.).

The biology of this species is virtually unknown, which is somewhat disturbing given that this is an inshore shark and caught with relatively high frequency by shore anglers in the Eastern Cape (pers. obs.). The gathering of biological data for this species should be considered a priority given that it is an endemic with a restricted range, with a habitat preference that is in a zone that experiences significant fishing pressure.

Distribution. Haploblepharus fuscus is verified as occurring coastally, south of latitude 33°S in South Africa ( Fig. 9 ). Haploblepharus fuscus is most commonly found in the Eastern Cape, from Storms River mouth to East London, however it is a rare visitor to the Western Cape and has been verified from a specimen collected in Langebaan Lagoon (SAM 32614), assuming that the locality given for this specimen is accurate. Haploblepharus fuscus almost certainly ranges north of East London, however, its northern limit on the east coast of South Africa is unknown. It apparently does not range as far north as Durban. Bass et al. (1975) record H. fuscus from southern kwaZulu-Natal, without specifics. Bass et al. (1975) and Bass (1986) also record a specimen from Bredasdorp, Western Cape (true locality probably Arniston, Stuisbaai or Cape Agulhas because Bredasdorp is more than 20 km inland), which they did not examine, however this specimen was examined by the author and was determined to be H. pictus (SAM 24545).

HT N Mean Min Max HT N Mean Min Max to be continued.

Etymology. Although Smith (1950) did not give the etymology in his original description, there is little doubt that the specific name comes from the Latin, fuscus , which means dusky, dark, or swarthy, and is in reference to the general drab brown colour of this species.

Common name. In an attempt to introduce species specific common names for this genus, this shark was given the name plain happy in Compagno & Human (2003). It is also known as the brown shyshark.

Study material. BAH 20020304.05, male 340 mm TL, Hamburg, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 33°17.2'S 27°28.9'E; BAH 20020304.06, male 580 mm TL, Hamburg, Eastern Cape, South Africa; LJVC 820916, gravid female 631 mm TL, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 33°53'S 25°39'E; MJS 941004, mature female 625 mm TL, Cape Recife, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 34°01.7'S 25°42.1'E; MJS 990217, mature female 609 mm TL, Cape Recife, Eastern Cape, South Africa; RUSI 21 holotype of Haploblepharus fuscus , see under Type Series and Locality for details; RUSI 3701, mature male 605 mm TL, Cape Padrone, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 33°46'S 26°28'E; RUSI 6079, previously ORI 2470, juvenile male 460 mm TL, Port Alfred, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 33°36'S 26°54'E; RUSI 6081, previously ORI 2787, mature female 610 mm TL, Port Alfred, Eastern Cape, South Africa; RUSI 6082, previously ORI 2471, adolescent male 543 mm TL, Port Alfred, Eastern Cape, South Africa; RUSI 7617, adolescent female 568 mm TL, Cape Padrone, Eastern Cape, South Africa; RUSI 10289, mature male 551 mm TL, Algoa Bay, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 34°02'S 25°42'E; RUSI 12826, mature male 602 mm TL, locality not recorded; RUSI 13144, 2 specimens, mature male 649 mm TL, Algoa Bay, Eastern Cape, South Africa; RUSI 14005, 2 specimens, one of which is referable to H. kistnasamyi , H. fuscus specimen is a mature male 637 mm TL, Cape Recife, Eastern Cape, South Africa; RUSI 19993, 3 specimens, 2 adolescent females 496 mm TL and 540 mm TL, mature male 550 mm TL, locality not recorded; RUSI 25182, mature male 577 mm TL, Paradise Beach, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 34°07'S 24°52.5'E; RUSI 25925, gravid female 571 mm TL, Cape Recife, Eastern Cape, South Africa; RUSI 41963, mature male 559 mm TL, Fish River Lighthouse, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 33°29'S 27°08'E; SAM 32523, 4 specimens, Storms River Mouth, Eastern Cape, South Africa, 34°01.3'S 23°54.7'E; SAM 32614, immature male 438 mm TL, Langebaan Lagoon (Klein Ostervaal farm), Western Cape, South Africa, 33°04.5'S 18°02.5'E.

Figures

FIGURE 7. Photographs of the holotype of Haploblepharus fuscus, RUSI 21, 530 mm TL adolescent male.

FIGURE 8. Photographs of Haploblepharus fuscus specimens: A) RUSI 25925; B) SAM 32614, to show the presence of spots or saddles, respectively, in this species.

FIGURE 9. Distribution of Haploblepharus fuscus as identified by the current study. Red dots are locality records for the species, the light blue line represents the 200 m isobath and the dark blue line represents the 1000 m isobath.

FIGURE 13. Photographs of example specimens tentatively assigned as juveniles of Haploblepharus kistnasamyi: A) MJS 970714; and B) live specimen in Port Elizabeth Aquarium (Photo: Malcolm Smale).

Tables

TABLE 3. Morphometric and meristic data for the holotype (HT) of Haploblepharus fuscus, plus sample size, mean and range for H. fuscus specimens (including the holotype). TL and WT are actual measurements in millimetres and grams, respectively. All other morphometric measurements are expressed as percentage of TL. Abbreviations as in Table 1.

WT	468.7	23	679.9	100.0	1210.0	P1B	5.8	21	5.8	4.5	6.6
TL	495	23	554.5	340.0	649.0	P1H	8.5	21	9.9	7.1	12.3
PCL	84.2	23	81.7	78.1	84.8	P1I	6.9	21	6.8	5.6	8.4
PD2	68.3	21	66.1	63.3	68.8	P1P	10.1	21	10.4	8.9	12.0
PD1	45.3	21	45.6	43.4	48.8	P1R	6.6	21	7.7	6.3	10.2
BDL	65.9	21	63.4	59.1	66.7	D1L	10.0	21	10.6	8.6	12.0
IDS	14.9	21	13.4	11.3	16.8	D1A	10.1	21	10.5	8.8	12.2
D2C	29.3	21	27.1	25.8	29.3	D1B	6.6	21	7.4	5.5	8.4
DCS	9.5	20	8.6	6.9	10.3	D1H	4.4	21	5.2	4.3	6.3
PAL	54.5	21	57.4	54.5	59.9	D1I	3.4	21	3.2	2.8	4.4
PP2	36.0	21	38.7	35.7	42.0	D1P	4.8	21	5.2	3.7	6.0
PP1	14.5	21	17.9	14.5	20.5	P2L	11.2	21	11.7	10.2	12.6
SVL	39.2	21	40.5	36.5	43.0	P2A	8.3	21	8.6	6.3	10.4
TRL	21.4	21	22.3	19.4	25.1	P2B	5.2	21	6.6	5.2	8.1
PPS	17.0	21	17.2	14.1	19.2	P2H	3.9	21	5.0	3.4	6.8
PAS	14.5	20	13.3	11.6	14.6	P2I	5.1	21	5.6	3.9	7.4
VCL	64.0	21	60.4	56.5	64.1	P2P	7.8	21	7.4	6.2	9.0
PCA	35.5	21	34.3	29.7	36.8	CLO	2.1	12	6.6	2.0	9.0
ACS	13.3	21	11.8	10.0	14.0	CLI	6.2	14	10.4	4.4	13.2
HDH2	6.8	21	6.1	5.2	7.5	CLB	0.9	12	2.4	0.7	7.6
HDW2	12.0	21	12.2	9.8	13.1	D2L	11.1	21	11.1	9.7	12.4
INO	6.4	21	6.1	5.5	6.6	D2A	10.3	21	10.7	8.7	11.9
HDH	9.0	21	8.3	7.2	10.2	D2B	8.3	21	8.0	6.7	9.2
HDW	13.0	21	13.3	8.9	14.7	D2H	4.6	21	4.8	3.4	6.2
TRH	8.9	21	8.7	6.2	10.8	D2I	2.6	21	3.1	2.6	3.7
TRW	12.1	21	12.2	9.8	16.6	D2P	4.8	21	5.2	4.2	6.2
GIR	34.9	21	35.0	30.4	42.9	ANL	11.8	21	12.9	11.7	14.3
ABH	8.5	21	9.7	6.8	11.4	ANA	8.7	21	9.0	7.4	10.3
ABW	11.0	21	11.4	7.9	15.1	ANB	9.9	21	10.3	8.8	11.6
TAH	7.1	21	6.4	5.8	7.4	ANH	4.0	21	4.4	3.5	5.0
TAW	7.1	21	6.4	5.5	7.6	ANI	2.5	21	2.6	2.1	3.3
CPH	3.7	21	3.7	3.3	4.1	ANP	5.6	21	6.5	5.1	7.9
CPW	2.6	21	2.1	1.7	2.6	CDM	19.2	21	18.7	17.3	20.1
HDL	18.0	21	18.6	16.9	20.2	CPV	9.3	21	10.2	8.9	12.0
PG1	14.5	21	14.5	12.3	15.4	CPU	9.7	21	9.0	7.3	10.7
PSP	9.1	21	9.0	8.1	9.4	CST	5.1	21	4.4	3.4	5.5
POB	5.8	21	5.9	5.1	6.3	CSW	3.1	21	2.9	2.1	3.2
EYL	3.4	21	2.9	2.5	3.4	CTR	4.4	21	4.6	3.5	5.6
EYH	1.3	21	1.5	1.1	1.7	CTL	5.5	21	5.4	5.0	5.8