Ophioscion Gill, 1863
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4991.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2DE8BCED-7F34-4A5D-9F2D-16F442D8273A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F887AC-FFD4-684A-26F6-FE67FD24FBB1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ophioscion Gill, 1863 |
status |
|
Genus Ophioscion Gill, 1863 View in CoL View at ENA as a junior synonym of Stellifer Oken, 1817
Gill (1863) designated the genus Ophioscion with the eastern Pacific species, O. typicus Gill, 1863 , as the type species, which was distinguished only from Bairdiella by having an oblong head, a narrow and prominent snout with a small, inferior mouth. The gas bladder of O. typicus has two chambers, as present in all stelliferines, but lacks appendages on the hind margin of the anterior chamber ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 , left). Chao (1978) distinguished the genus Ophioscion from Stellifer , by lacking a pair of variably developed appendages on the hind margin of the anterior chamber ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Sasaki (1989) incorrectly assigned the tooth plate on pharyngobranchial 2, enlarged and anteriorly located, as an autapomorphic character of Ophioscion ; when in fact they share this derived condition with other closely related genera (e.g. Bairdiella ), and this should be considered a homoplasy. Additionally, Sasaki added the medially concave ventral margin of the palatine as an autapomorphy of Stellifer . Therefore, the morphological features separating the current Stellifer genus from other genera within Stelliferinae are the enlarged lapillus that is about the same size of the oval shaped sagittal otoliths ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) vs. shorter and triangular in Bairdiella , Corvula , Elattarchus and Odontoscion ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ), and the vertebral counts of 10 abdominal and 15 caudal in Stellifer (Ophioscion) , vs. either 12+13 or 11+ 14 in other stelliferine genera ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Recent molecular studies ( Santos et al. 2013; Barbosa et al. 2014; Lo et al. 2015; Silva et al. 2018) have confirmed that Stelliferinae is a monophyletic group, but the monophyly of Ophioscion and Stellifer are not supported. We agree with the suggestion of Silva et al. (2018) that Ophioscion is a junior synonym of Stellifer .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |