Eschatomoxys Blaisdell, 1935

López-Guerrero, Irma, 2007, Figs. 30 – 33. Attavicinus monstrosus. 30 in Comparison of Mouthpart Morphology of Three Species of Mexican Oniticellini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in Relation to Their Trophic Habits, The Coleopterists Bulletin 61 (4), pp. 519-540 : 519-540

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F6F264-FFEF-FF96-B91E-FED8FC312617

treatment provided by

Valdenar

scientific name

Eschatomoxys Blaisdell
status

 

Key to Species of Eschatomoxys Blaisdell

1. Pronotum with lateral marginal bead complete ( Fig. 6 View Figs )................ 2

1. 9 Pronotum with lateral marginal bead incomplete ( Figs. 3 View Figs , 5 View Figs ), a ruga extending back from anterior angle and forward from posterior angle, but absent at middle....................................................... 3

522 524 2. Pronotum with anterolateral angles acutely produced cephalad ( Fig. 7 View Figs ); disc with surface densely, coarsely punctate, punctures equal in size to eye facets, most separated by about width of puncture (Gulf of California)................................. E. paco Aalbu and Thomas

2. 9 Pronotum with anterolateral angles only weakly produced; disc finely, sparsely punctate, separation mostly three times puncture width (southern California)..................... E. a ndrewsi Aalbu and Thomas

3. Eyes large in proportion to size of head, separation between posterior margin of eye and cervix less than twice diameter of eye ( Fig. 4 View Figs )..... 4

3. 9 Eyes small in proportion to size of head, separation between posterior margin of eye and cervix at least twice diameter of eye ( Fig. 5 View Figs )....... 5

4. Anterolateral angles of pronotum somewhat produced; lateral marginal bead extending back from anterolateral angle about onehalf width of pronotum; punctures dorsad of bead coarse and dense (midriff Islands, Baja California)........... E. rosei Aalbu and Thomas

4. 9 Anterolateral angles of pronotum weakly produced ( Fig. 3 View Figs ); lateral marginal bead extending back from angle only about one-fourth to one-third width of pronotum; punctures dorsad of bead sparse (California and Arizona)............................. E. wagneri Blaisdell

5. Gula well demarcated, rectangular; tentorial pits distinct, each pit connected to cervix by narrow, linear sulcus; cuticle of gula shargreened, cuticle either side of gula rugopunctate (Grand Canyon, Arizona)..................................... E. pholeter Thomas and Pape

5. 9 Gula obsolescent, when evident, subtriangular (narrowed anteriorly); tentorial pits indicated only as scars; cuticle behind pits rugopunctate (southern Utah).......................... E. tanneri Sorensen and Stones

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Tenebrionidae

Genus

Eschatomoxys

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF