Philautus tinniens, (JERDON, 1853)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00466.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10546124 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F5945F-FF97-1E7F-FC7D-FD5EFB8BC7CC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2021-09-01 01:14:39, last updated 2024-01-21 12:38:58) |
scientific name |
Philautus tinniens |
status |
|
PHILAUTUS TINNIENS ( JERDON, 1853) View in CoL
( FIGS 2 View Figure 2 , 58 View Figure 58 , 59A; TABLE View Figure 59 2)
Type material: Neotype, MNHN 1985.0527 About MNHN , an adult female, SVL 25.0 mm, from ‘the South-East of the Ooty Lake , Udhagamangalam [“Ootacamund”, “Ooty”]’, Nilgiri Hills, Tamil Nadu, India.
Other material studied: BNHS 4497, an adult female, from Avalanche; BNHS 4548, an adult female, and BNHS 4495, an adult male, from Udhagamandalam; BNHS 4494, an adult male, from Coonoor; BNHS 4496, an adult male, from Naduvattam ( Table 2).
Identity: Presently, Ixalus punctatus Anderson, 1871 , Ixalus montanus Günther, 1876 , and Philautus melanensis Rao, 1937 are considered synonyms of P. tinniens ( Bossuyt & Dubois, 2001) .
As already noted by Bossuyt & Dubois (2001), specimens at the Natural History Museum, London, from Kudremukh under the nomen I. montanus are different from P. tinniens from the Nilgiri Hills. We made a detailed examination of the 14 specimens at the Natural History Museum, London, from Kudremukh under the nomen I. montanus , and revealed that they are different in identity from P. tinniens and other species described from this region. Philautus montanus ( Günther, 1876) chiefly differs from P. tinniens by its longer snout–vent length, male SVL 29.0 ± 2.3 mm, N = 5; female SVL 35.6 ± 2.6 mm, N = 9 (vs. male SVL 20.5 ± 1.8, N = 3; female SVL 26.8 ± 1.6 mm, N = 3), and by flanks and groin yellowish brown (vs. dark brown), apart from other morphometric characters. However, we await fresh collections and DNA analyses before taking a taxonomic decision.
Diagnosis: Philautus tinniens can be easily distinguished from known congeners by the following combination of characters: (1) small adult size (male SVL 20.5 ± 1.8 mm, N = 3; female SVL 26.8 mm ± 1.6 mm, N = 3); (2) shank very short; (3) lateral side coarsely granular; (4) flanks and groin dark-brownish black; (5) first two fingers yellow in life, and light-yellowish white in preservation; (6) tibiotarsal articulation reaches below the level of the eye.
Description of the neotype: A detailed description of the neotype was published in Bossuyt & Dubois (2001).
direct development and hatching of froglets took place after 19 days.
Remarks: This species was incorrectly identified as I. variabilis (BMNH 74.4.29.625, SVL 16.0 mm, and BMNH 74.4.29.652, SVL 16.1 mm) from ‘Malabar’ by Boulenger (1882).
Bossuyt F, Dubois A. 2001. A review of the frog genus Philautus Gistel, 1848 (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae, Rhacophorinae). Zeylanica 6: 1 - 112.
Boulenger GA. 1882. Catalogue of the Batrachia Salientia s. Ecaudata in the collection of the British Museum. London: Taylor & Francis.
Gunther A. 1876. Third report on collections of Indian reptiles obtained by the British Museum. Proceedings of Zoological Society 1875: 567 - 577.
Jerdon TC. 1853. Catalogue of reptiles inhabiting the Peninsula of India (continued from p. 479). Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal 1870: 1486 - 1488.
Rao CRN. 1937. On some new forms of Batrachia from S. India. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Science, Biology 6: 387 - 427.
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogram (GTR + G + I; –Ln L = 14 763.97) for the mitochondrial DNA data set of 1488 bp of 34 taxa of Western Ghats Philautus and five outgroup species. Numbers above branches indicate nonparametric bootstrap values under maximum parsimony (MP). Numbers below branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities. *Values of less than 50.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.