Acanthodrilus capensis Beddard, 1885
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.282224 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5B915EB8-8E2A-4E32-AF91-3D4CD890989A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6171482 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F54361-FF96-FFA1-E68B-D43ABEB46B49 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acanthodrilus capensis Beddard, 1885 |
status |
|
Acanthodrilus capensis Beddard, 1885 View in CoL —species dubia
Acanthodrilus capensis Beddard, 1885: 370 View in CoL .
Acanthodrilus capensis: Beddard: 1895 View in CoL : 539; Reynolds & Cook 1976: 85. Chilota capensis: Michaelsen 1900: 147 .
nec Chilota capensis in Michaelsen 1913a: 496, 1913b: 49 according to Pickford 1937: 576. Chilota capensis ( Beddard, 1885) : Pickford 1937: 576.
? Chilota (? Parachilota View in CoL ) capensis ( Beddard, 1885) sp. dubia: Pickford 1937: 576. Chilota knysnanus Michaelsen, 1913 : Pickford 1937: 258 [partim].
Type locality. RSA, EC: ‘Uitenhage, near Port Elizabeth’. The original site of Beddard’s capensis detected by Pickford (1937: 576) in the documentation kept in the SAMC archive is in accordance with the information supplied by Beddard (1884) based on notes obtained from Rev. G.R. Fisk, pointing to acanthodrilid and microchaetid sampling at that time, in the neighbourhood of Port Elizabeth ( Plisko 1999).
Remarks. Lack of the type material and noted discrepancy in description of few important taxonomically characters (shape of prostomium, position of nephridial pores, position of ovaries, seminal vesicles, location of prostates and shape of spermathecae) lead Pickford (1937: 576) to consider capensis as species dubia.
Insufficient description of Acanthodrilus capensis Beddard, 1885 from Uitenhage, near Port Elizabeth (Eastern Cape) lead to confusion and erroneous identification by Michaelsen (1913a, b) a new material from the Western Cape. Pickford (1937: 576) corrected Michaelsen's errors. The new material from ‘Südwestliches Kapland, Moddergat bei Lyndedoch im Stellenbosch-Distrikt’ assigned by Michaelsen (1913a, b) to ‘ capensis ’ was recognized and described by Pickford as a new species, Parachilota michaelsenianus Pickford, 1937 .
Fragments of a specimen from ‘ ex typis A. sclateri sp. inquir.’ are mixed with fragments of Michaelsen material ‘ Chilota knysnanus ’ (also sp. dubia) in the sample ‘ Type 355 SAMC’
SAMC |
Iziko Museums of Cape Town |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Acanthodrilus capensis Beddard, 1885
Plisko, Jadwiga Danuta 2012 |
Chilota
Pickford 1937: 576 |
Pickford 1937: 258 |
Chilota capensis
Pickford 1937: 576 |
Pickford 1937: 576 |
Michaelsen 1913: 496 |
Acanthodrilus capensis:
Reynolds 1976: 85 |
Michaelsen 1900: 147 |
Beddard 1895: 1895 |
Acanthodrilus capensis
Beddard 1885: 370 |