Cheilosia ( Convocheila ) cumanica Szilády, 1938
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1023.3097 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:70585BDD-5981-4967-A09C-543CE5D7C717 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17442631 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F19912-AF61-FFFB-FE38-FD8BFEE87ABE |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Cheilosia ( Convocheila ) cumanica Szilády, 1938 |
| status |
|
Cheilosia ( Convocheila) cumanica Szilády, 1938 View in CoL
Fig. 25
Cheilosia cumanica Szilády, 1938: 143 View in CoL .
Cheilosia verae Stackelberg, 1968: 229 View in CoL . Syn. with Cheilosia cumanica View in CoL by Brădescu (1991).
Cheilosia verae View in CoL – Stackelberg & Richter 1968: 249. — Stackelberg 1970: 62. — Peck 1988: 119. — Barkalov 1993: 712. — Barkalov & Mutin 2018: 484.
Cheilosia verae Stackelberg, 1956 View in CoL [sic] – Gujabidze 2002: 246.
Cheilosia cumanica View in CoL – Mengual et al. 2020: 22.
Differential diagnosis
Cheilosia cumanica belongs to the subgenus Convocheila Barkalov, 2002 . One of the distinctive characters of the subgenus is the pilosity on the face: long pilose along paraface in dorsal one third of face. In the males of Convocheila the ventral lobe of the postgonite is sickle-shaped. Within the Caucasus, the only other member of the subgenus Convocheila is C. laticornis , and the male of C. cumanica can be easily distinguished from C. laticornis by the pilose eye (bare in C. laticornis ), the female has few long black pile on the occiput, besides long yellow pile (with only long yellow pile in C. laticornis ) and scutellum on posterior margin with robust black setae (with weak, yellow setae in C. laticornis ). The male genitalia of C. cumanica are figured in Radenković et al. (2020).
Material examined
Collected in 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023; see Mengual et al. (2020) for detailed records from 2018.
Genetics
All DNA barcodes of C. cumanica are recovered together with high support value (BS = 100%).
Remarks
In the Caucasus, this taxon is often reported under the name C. verae , but Brădescu (1991) synonymized C. verae under C. cumanica . Our genetic results (Supp. file 1: Fig. S1) support this synonymy as specimens from the Caucasus cluster together with specimens from Serbia.
Biology
During our expeditions, collected between 2 May and 19 July at an altitude between 625 and 2700 m a.s.l. Most common on alpine meadows where it feeds on the flowers of herbaceous plants.
Distribution
Balkan Peninsula, Carpathian Mountains, Iran, and Caucasus ( Armenia, Georgia, Russia).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubFamily |
Eristalinae |
|
Genus |
Cheilosia ( Convocheila ) cumanica Szilády, 1938
| Bot, Sander, Mengual, Ximo, Meutter, Frank Van de & Skevington, Jeffrey H. 2025 |
Cheilosia cumanica
| Mengual X. & Bot S. & Chkhartishvili T. & Reimann T. & Thormann J. & von der Mark L. 2020: 22 |
Cheilosia verae
| Gujabidze M. 2002: 246 |
Cheilosia verae
| Barkalov A. V. & Mutin V. 2018: 484 |
| Barkalov A. V. 1993: 712 |
| Peck L. V. 1988: 119 |
| Stackelberg A. A. 1970: 62 |
| Stackelberg A. A. & Richter V. A. 1968: 249 |
Cheilosia cumanica Szilády, 1938: 143
| Szilady Z. 1938: 143 |
Cheilosia verae
| Cheilosia verae Stackelberg, 1968: 229 |
