Calyptomastix ingemanni, Enghoff, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.803.1691 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B66C8AE-F00A-42F6-9641-26B0ECC49F78 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6373792 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E2D6F8CA-F6F2-45AC-80F9-21D80EB6A698 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:E2D6F8CA-F6F2-45AC-80F9-21D80EB6A698 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Calyptomastix ingemanni |
status |
sp. nov. |
Calyptomastix ingemanni View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E2D6F8CA-F6F2-45AC-80F9-21D80EB6A698
Figs 1 View Fig , 14–16 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Diagnosis
Differs from other species of Calyptomastix by the combination of having a post-torsal spine (= postfemoral spine of Hoffman & Howell 2012) lacking a proper lateral metaplical process but instead having a more apical posteriad triangular process and a small fingerlike process in the cavity of the cucullus.
Etymology
After my grandson Ingemann Andreas Enghoff Mogensen.
Material examined (total 2 ♂♂)
Holotype TANZANIA • ♂; Kilimanjaro Region, Mwanga District, North Pare mountains , Kiverenge FR; 03°48′41.0″ S, 37°38′52.5″ E; 1563 m a.s.l.; 14 May 2011; S. Frederiksen leg.; NHMD 621715 . GoogleMaps
Paratype TANZANIA • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; NHMD 621716 GoogleMaps .
Description (male)
SIZE. Length 45–47 mm, diameter 2.6–2.8 mm, 68–69 podous rings, no apodous rings in front of telson.
COLOUR. Uniform dark grey, posterior part of metazonites amber, a dorsal yellow stripe. Head except clypeal region, collum, antennae and preanal ring dark brownish grey; clypeal region and anal valves reddish brown. Legs yellowish.
SUPRALBRAL SETAE. 4.
MANDIBULAR STIPES. With triangular disto-ventral lobe, distal margin hence concave.
ANAL VALVES. With very small dorsal spine, no ventral spine or corner, margins not raised, each with 3 sessile setae.
LIMBUS ( Fig. 15F View Fig ). With rounded-triangular, striate lobes.
LEGS. Postfemoral and tibial pads on post-gonopodal legs, pads diminishing and eventually disappearing towars posterior end.
FIRST PAIR OF LEGS ( Fig. 14A–C View Fig ). Prefemoral lobes relatively long, slender-triangular in ventral view. Two to three coxosternal setae (CXS) close to lateral margin of coxosternum, well separated from prefemoral lobes. Prefemora with two short mesapical setae (APS) and a scattering of peglike sensilla (LPS) extending to tip of prefemoral lobe.
STERNUM 9 ( Fig. 14D View Fig ). In the shape of a transverse, parallel-sided, slightly curved band.
GONOPOD COXA ( Fig. 15A–E View Fig ). Proplica (PP) slender, almost parallel-sided, simple, with a relatively large proplical lobe (PPL) distally. Metaplica (MP) simple, without a basal metaplical flange, subdistally with a posteriad, pointed triangular process (mtp). Cucullus (CU) apically with slender, fingerlike process (fp) facing proplical lobe.
GONOPOD TELOPODITE ( Fig. 16 View Fig ). Arculus 90º. Torsotope (TT) extended, post-torsal narrowing (PN) not very pronounced. A long, stout post-torsal spine (PTS) making more than a full turn around post-torsal
area. Solenomere (SLM) slender, simple, relatively short, all but completely hidden within telomere, tip fluted. Telomere (TM) in anterior and basal views ( Fig 16B, D View Fig ) appearing as a simple, oblong, distally expanded structure (in outline vaguely resembling the cartoon character Horace Horsecollar); in posterior, ventral, and mesal views ( Fig. 16A, E, C View Fig ) with several convoluted membranes, among which the tip of the solenomerite sticks out.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in the North Pare Mts.
Remarks
The small fingerlike process (fp) facing the proplical lobe reminds of the condition in several species of the genus Helicochetus Attems, 1909 , see, e.g., Enghoff (2016: figs 5–6). The telopodites of the two genera are, however, vastly different.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Archepyginae |
Tribe |
Prionopetalini |
Genus |