Xerus erythropus Desmarest, 1817
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7353130 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7287819 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF8108-FFB3-FF82-CA4D-AE423738FA77 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Xerus erythropus Desmarest, 1817 |
status |
|
Xerus erythropus Desmarest, 1817 View in CoL . In Nouv. Diet. Hist. Nat., Nouv. ed., 10:110.
TYPE LOCALITY: Senegal (neotype). Origin of original type unknown. "Inconnue."
DISTRIBUTION: SE Morocco, S Mauritania, Senegal, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Ivory Coast, S Mali, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Togo, Benin, SE Niger, NE Nigeria, Cameroon, NE Congo, SE Chad, NE Central African Republic, Sudan, Zaire, NW Uganda, Rwanda, W Ethiopia, W Kenya, N Tanzania .
SYNONYMS: agadius (Thomas and Hinton, 1921); albovittatus (Desmarest, 1817); chadensis (Thomas, 1905); fulvior (Thomas, 1905); lacustris (Thomas, 1905); lessonii (Fitzinger, 1867, new name for marabutus Lesson); leucoumbrinus (Riippell, 1835); limitaneus (Thomas and Hinton, 1923); maestus (Thomas, 1910); marabutus (Lesson, 1838); microdon Thomas, 1905; prestigiator (Lesson, 1838).
COMMENTS: Placed in Euxerus which is considered a subgenus of Xerus by Ellerman (1940), Moore (1959), and Amtmann (1975). The name erythopus or erythropus is commonly attributed to E. Geoffroy, 1803. Cat. Mamm. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris, p. 178, who gave the name as erythopus; however, this work was never published and is therefore unavailable (see Appendix I). The next available use of the name erythopus was by Desmarest, 1817. Shinz, 1845, used the spelling erythropus . Opinion 945 of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1971) ruled that erythopus Geoffroy, 1803 be changed to erythropus as an incorrect original spelling. The proper latin root is "erythro". In the last 100 years nearly all authors have used the spelling erythropus . In the interest of orthographic stability we advocate that the specific name be spelled erythropus . It is not desirable to perpetuate the lapsus in spelling by early workers.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.