Eothenomys Miller, 1896
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7353034 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7203892 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF6D11-FFAF-042F-6EA6-F720C478F5B6 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Eothenomys Miller, 1896 |
status |
|
Eothenomys Miller, 1896 . N. Am. Fauna, 12:45.
REVIEWED BY: M. L. Johnson (MLJ).
COMMENT: Includes Anteliomys (see Ellerman and Morrison-Scott, 1951:667) and Phaulomys (see Corbet, 1978:100). Gromov and Polyakov, 1977:137, considered Anteliomys a distinct genus. Revised by Corbet, 1978, and Aimi, 1980, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ. Ser. Biol., 8: 35-84, who included Aschizomys in this genus, and were followed here (RSH); closely related to Hyperacrius, Alticola, and Dinaromys (JC). Placed in tribe Clethrionomyini by Gromov and Polyakov, 1977:158.
ISIS NUMBER: 5301410008076000000 as Eothenomys .
5301410008070000000 as Aschizomys .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Eothenomys Miller, 1896
James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl 1982 |
Eothenomys
Miller 1896: 45 |