Cosmophasis umbratica Simon 1903

Hurni-Cranston, Tiziano & Hill, David E., 2021, Three new jumping spiders of the genus Cosmophasis from Wallacea (Araneae: Salticidae: Chrysillini), Peckhamia 228 (1), pp. 1-84 : 46

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7171908

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D981C4B1-710B-472A-91E1-AFFA52361ED0

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7169897

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF095C-2B7A-0445-E84F-FF0F2DE87D55

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Cosmophasis umbratica Simon 1903
status

 

9. Cosmophasis umbratica Simon 1903 View in CoL

Figures 41-45 View Figure 41 View Figure 42 View Figure 43 View Figure 44 View Figure 45 , Map ( Figure 1 View Figure 1 ) #57

A series of studies of the courtship and agonistic behavior of Cosmophasis umbratica have been published in recent years, based on spiders collected in Singapore (Lim & Li 2004, 2006a, 2006b, 2007, 2013; Lim, Land & Li 2007; Lim, Li & Li 2008; Taylor & McGraw 2007). Land et al. (2007) described the layered structure of iridescent, ultraviolet reflecting scales of this species, and Bulbert et al (2015) later studied the predatory cost of male ornamentation. With all of these studies, one might assume that this species is well-known. That is not the case. The only descriptions that we have for C. umbratica are Simon's original but brief text description of a male, and subsequent drawings of Simon's male specimen by Prószyński (1984). Both appear here in their entirety, with a new English translation of Simon's description, in Appendix 5. Dyal (1935) listed an all-black 5 mm female with diminuitive ALE from remote Lahore, Pakistan under C. umbratica . That specimen is definitely not a Cosmophasis . Thus the female of C. umbratica , though often subject to study, has never been described.

But even the description of the male ( Simon 1903b; Prószyński 1984) is problematic. There is little here to suggest that C. umbratica is anything other than a synonym for C. thalassina . This is supported by the fact that the type for C. thalassina came from Bintan Island (see Appendix 4), near Singapore where C. umbratica has been most often observed. The drawing of the male pedipalp of C. umbratica by Prószyński (1984) differs somewhat from more recent published ( Żabka & Waldock 2012) images of the pedipalp of C. thalassina in that the rotation of the pedipalp in the former is about 220°, the latter 160°. However this does not account for the possibility of intraspecific variation, or the possibility that Prószyński's drawing is either skewed in angle or inaccurately drawn.

At present the two species cannot be reliably separated in the field. Those identified as C. umbratica have either a locality closer to Singapore than to Australia, males with more gold-colour in their iridescent scales, or females with more colourful scale colour. But we also know that female C. thalassina are quite variable in colouration, even in Australia, with distinct to indistinct transverse bars across the dorsal opisthosoma. In Figures 41-45 View Figure 41 View Figure 42 View Figure 43 View Figure 44 View Figure 45 we present a series of photographs of males and females that could be identified as C. umbratica , as well as photographs of immatures from the same areas. The immatures are similar to the immature C. thalassina shown above ( Figures 39-40 View Figure 39 View Figure 40 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Salticidae

Genus

Cosmophasis

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF