Tomoglossa Kraatz, 1856
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4619813 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4619827 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB87A5-FFCF-C10F-FE8A-FC42A824F96D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tomoglossa Kraatz, 1856 |
status |
|
Tomoglossa Kraatz, 1856 View in CoL ( Figs. 146 View FIGURES 112 View FIGURES 1320 View FIGURES 2128 View FIGURES 2933 View FIGURES 3437 View FIGURES 3842 View FIGURES 4346 )
Tomoglossa Kraatz, 1856: 342 View in CoL .
Tomoglossa View in CoL ; Bernhauer, 1907b: 401.
Noverota Casey, 1910: 90, syn. nov.
Tomoglossa ; Fenyes, 1920: 255.
Atheta (Noverota) ; Fenyes, 1920: 199.
Tomoglossa ; Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 598.
Atheta (Noverota) ; Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 606.
Tomoglossa ; Scheerpeltz, 1963: 123.
Tomoglossa ; Benick & Lohse, 1974: 107.
Tomoglossa ; Sawada, 1977: 192.
Noverota; Seevers, 1978: 122.
Tomoglossa ; Lohse, 1989: 208.
Noverota; Newton, Thayer, Ashe & Chandler, 2000: 369.
(Other references for Palaearctic Tomoglossa are omitted)
Type Species. Homalota luteicornis Erichson, 1837 , by monotypy.
Diagnosis. Tomoglossa can be distinguished from other athetine genera by the combination of the following characters: parallelsided body; slender sickleshaped mandibles ( Figs. 13 View FIGURES 112 ); ligula with two completely separate lobes ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 112 ); mentum fused with submentum ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 112 ); pronotum with microsetae directed posteriorly throughout the disc (Type VI, Benick and Lohse 1974) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 20 ); pronotal macrosetae inconspicuous; pronotal hypomera fully visible in lateral aspect; metasternal process extremely short and wide, virtually nonexistent, perhaps better described as convexity of the anterior margin of metasternum ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13 20 ); mesotibia with short median macroseta (shorter than tibial width); metatarsal segment 1 longer than segment 2 ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 20 ); without empodial setae; with numerous erect macrosetae and long semierect microsetae on abdominal terga VIIVIII.
Tomoglossa shares with Hydrosmecta Thomson, 1858 slender mandibles, inconspicuous process of the metasternum, and the lack of empodial setae. Tomoglossa can be easily distinguished from Hydrosmecta by its less slender body, more widely separated lobes of the ligula, less transverse mentum fused with submentum, pubescence directed posteriorly everywhere on the pronotal disc (Type VI), shorter metasternum, and long erect setation of the apical abdominal segments.
Tomoglossa is similar to Geostiba Thomson, 1858 in having pronotal pubescence of Type VI; however, Tomoglossa differs in having slender mandibles, more widely separated lobes of ligula, less transverse mentum fused with submentum, inconspicuous metasternal process, long and erect setation of the apical abdominal segments and in lacking empodial setae.
Description. Length 1.62.1 mm. Head reddish brown to dark brown; pronotum yellow to reddish yellow, lighter than head; elytra from brownish yellow to brown, with yellow apical (1/3 to 1/5) portion; abdominal segments IIIV and VIIVIII yellow to reddish yellow; abdominal tergum VI darker, reddish brown to dark brown; antennae uniformly yellow or with darker articles 211; maxillar palpi uniformly yellow or with darker article 3; legs yellow to reddish yellow. Body form parallelsided.
Head transverse, eyes as long as temples (seen from above); infraorbital carina complete. Antennal articles 2 and 3 of equal length, 45 subquadrate, 610 slightly transverse, apical article as long as 9 and 10 combined, without coeloconic sensilla. Labrum ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 112 ) transverse and narrow, with straight anterior margin. Mandibles ( Figs. 13 View FIGURES 112 ) symmetrical, slender, sickleshaped, with a small medial tooth; ventral molar area without patches of denticles, dorsal molar region without visible “velvety patch” (400x) (Figs. 227.22231.22 in Newton et al. 2000: 309). Maxilla ( Figs. 47 View FIGURES 112 ) with galea as long as lacinia, apical lobe of galea covered with numerous fine and short setae; interior margin of galea with row of setae subapically; apical third of lacinia with row of closely spaced spines, middle third produced medially and covered with numerous setae. Labial palpi with three articles; ligula divided into two completely separate lobes; medial pseudopore field of prementum with 45 pseudopores ( Sawada 1970, 1972), lateral areas with pair of twin pores, single spinose pore and 46 irregular pseudopores ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 112 ). Mentum ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 112 ) with anterior margin concave, posteriorly fused with submentum.
Pronotum transverse, broadest slightly in front of middle, sides broadly rounded, anterior margin straight, anterior and posterior angles rounded; posterior margin convex; surface covered with short microsetae directed posteriorly in both midline and lateral areas (Type VI, Benick & Lohse 1974); macrosetae very short, limited to one macroseta at each of anterior and posterior angles and one on each lateral margin; hypomera fully visible in lateral aspect. Posterior margin of elytra straight. Wings present, fully developed. Mesosternal process short and wide, extending 1/4 length of mesocoxal cavities, metasternal process almost nonexistent, anterior margin of metasternum only slightly convex medially ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13 20 ); mesosternum and mesosternal process not carinate medially; relative lengths of mesosternal process: isthmus: metasternal process in ratio of about 6:19:1; mesocoxal cavities margined posteriorly; mesocoxae narrowly separated. Mesotibia with very short median macroseta (shorter than tibia width). Tarsal segmentation 455; metatarsal segment 1 longer than segment 2 ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 13 20 ). No empodial setae present.
Abdominal terga IIIV with moderate transverse basal impressions. Tergum VII 1.6 times longer than VI. Puncturation of terga IIIV equally sparse, puncturation of terga VI VII sparser. Terga VIIVIII with numerous erect macrosetae and long semierect microsetae. Tergum VIII ( Figs. 17, 19 View FIGURES 13 20 , 34 View FIGURES 34 37 , 38 View FIGURES 38 42 , 43 View FIGURES 43 46 ) in both sexes with basal row of long microsetae. Female sternum VIII ( Figs. 16, 18 View FIGURES 13 20 , 35 View FIGURES 34 37 , 44 View FIGURES 43 46 ) with row of apical microsetae (as in other Athetini).
Median lobe of aedeagus ventrally with very characteristic structure in the area of basal pore ( Figs. 2122 View FIGURES 21 28 , 4041 View FIGURES 38 42 ). Internal sac with a deeply concave sclerite ( Figs. 2324 View FIGURES 21 28 , 42 View FIGURES 38 42 ). Copulatory piece ( Sawada 1972) without apical process ( Figs. 25 View FIGURES 21 28 , 42 View FIGURES 38 42 ).
Spermatheca with wide umbilicus ( Muona 1990) ( Figs. 26 View FIGURES 21 28 , 36 View FIGURES 34 37 , 45 View FIGURES 43 46 ).
Discussion. The type species of Noverota (N. ornatella Casey, 1910 , by original designation) and Tomoglossa ( T. luteicornis ( Erichson, 1837)) differ only in body coloration ( T. luteicornis being darker) and in minor details of genitalia ( Figs. 2126 View FIGURES 21 28 in this paper and Fig. 123 in Lohse 1989). As a result, Noverota is placed in synonymy with Tomoglossa . Apparently Casey was not familiar with Tomoglossa and when describing Noverota he compared it only with Hydrosmecta . Casey (1910) included seven species in the genus Noverota. Three of these species belong to Tomoglossa . They are redescribed below. Noverota clemens Casey, 1910, N. finitima Casey, 1910, and N. scenica Casey, 1910 belong to Philhygra Mulsant & Rey, 1873 and will be redescribed elsewhere. The taxonomic position of N. personata Casey, 1910 is not clear, but it does not belong to Tomoglossa . The species is known from a single female type and a detailed study of its mouthparts is not possible. When additional specimens of this species are found the position of the species can be clarified. Two new species of Tomoglossa are described below. Thus, five valid Nearctic species of Tomoglossa are currently known.
In the key by Ashe ( Newton et al. 2000) the specimens belonging to Tomoglossa run to the second half of the couplet 58. In the key by Benick and Lohse (1974) the same specimens easily reach Tomoglossa at couplet 8.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Aleocharinae |
Tomoglossa Kraatz, 1856
Gusarov, Vladimir I. 2002 |
Tomoglossa
Kraatz 1856: 342 |
Tomoglossa
Kraatz 1856 |