Hypselodoris fucata Gosliner & Johnson, 1999

Tibiriçá, Yara, Pola, Marta & Cervera, Juan Lucas, 2017, Astonishing diversity revealed: an annotated and illustrated inventory of Nudipleura (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) from Mozambique, Zootaxa 4359 (1), pp. 1-133 : 33

publication ID	https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4359.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D06174D-B19F-4B5C-B9B0-DA74E6D43C75
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6025863
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB87A2-FFF0-FFA5-9790-F9A8FBA9FF15
treatment provided by	Plazi (2017-12-01 10:00:15, last updated 2024-11-28 18:37:34)
scientific name	Hypselodoris fucata Gosliner & Johnson, 1999
status

Treatment

Hypselodoris fucata Gosliner & Johnson, 1999 View in CoL

( Figures 7 L View FIGURE 7 , 10 A View FIGURE 10 )

Material examined. Five specimens. MB28-004602, ZAR, 12 Jul. 2016, 32m, 32mm; MB28-004684, ZMC, 13 Jun. 2014, 8m, 82mm; MB28-004791, ZKW, 0 6 Jan. 2014, 48m, 40mm; MB28-004792, ZKW, 0 6 Jan. 2014, 48m, 29mm; MHN-YT 1221, 10 May 2014, POD, 18m, 21mm.

Habitats. Subtropical rocky reefs and wreck.

Occurrences. Ponta do Ouro and Zavora.

Geographic distribution. Western Indian Ocean. Kenya (Gosliner et al. 2008) , South Africa ( Gosliner & Johnson 1999) and Mozambique .

Remarks. This species is closely related to H. kaname from the Pacific Ocean, differing externally by the presence of longitudinal white lines and internally by details of the radula and jaw rodlets ( Johnson & Gosliner 1999). In one of the specimens collected by us the white lines running from the back of each rhinophore were reduced ( Fig. 10 A View FIGURE 10 ). This species was found mating with a second morphotype with obvious white lines ( Fig. 7 L View FIGURE 7 ). Thus, caution is required when using such characteristics as a diagnostic feature.

References

Gosliner, T. M. & Johnson, R. F. (1999) Phylogeny of Hypselodoris (Nudibranchia: Chromodorididae) with a review of the monophyletic clade of Indo-Pacific species, including descriptions of twelve new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 125, 1 - 114. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1999. tb 00586. x

Figures

FIGURE 7. A, Goniobranchus kitae (MB28-004868). B, Goniobranchus lekker (MB28-004435). C, Goniobranchus pruna (MB28-004571). D, Goniobranchus tennentanus (MB28-004664). E–F Goniobranchus cf. tinctorius (MB28-004870 and MB28-004872, respectively). G, Goniobranchus verrieri (MB28-004657). H, Hypselodoris bullockii (MB28-004828). I–J, Hypselodoris carnea (MHN-YT358, MB28-004477, ZMBN117032 and MHN-YT471, respectively). K, Hypselodoris emma (MB28-004548).L, Hypselodoris fucata (MB28-004791).

FIGURE 10. A, Hypselodoris fucata (MB28-004792). B, Hypselodoris ghardaqana (MB28-004944). C–D, Hypselodoris infucata (MB28-004470 and MB28-005084). E, Hypselodoris kanga (MB28-004536). F–I, Hypselodoris maculosa (MB28- 004714, MB28-005022, MHN-YT1054 and MB28-004902, respectively). J, Hypselodoris maridadilus (MB28-004860). K, Hypselodoris nigrolineata (MB28-005007).L, Hypselodoris nigrostriata (MB28-005085).