Tylopus thunghaihin, Likhitrakarn & Golovatch & Panha, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.195 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3852414 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB5A00-FFE7-7D74-AC0B-D78EFB729A62 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Tylopus thunghaihin |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tylopus thunghaihin View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D8C75297-3063-4B15-ADA6-D86AD5796B96
Figs 18–20 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 26 View Fig
Diagnosis
The new species seems to be especially similar to T. nodulipes ( Attems, 1953) , but differs in the body tegument being dull, coupled with gonopodal process m smaller, process z high and rounded, and process x pointed.
Etymology
To emphasize the type locality, in Lao “Thung Hai Hin”, commonly translated as the famous Plain of Jars, a noun in apposition.
Material examined
Holotype
LAOS: Ƌ, Plain of Jars , Xieng Khouang, 19°25'50" N, 103°09'15" E, ca 1100 m a.s.l., 26 Nov. 2014, leg. S.I. Golovatch, C. Sutcharit, N. Likhitrakarn ( CUMZ).
GoogleMapsParatype
LAOS: 1 ♀, same data as for holotype ( CUMZ).
Description
MEASUREMENTS AND COLOUR. Length 26.1 (Ƌ) or 26.2 mm (♀), width of midbody pro- and metazonae 2.02 and 3.02 mm (Ƌ) or 2.04 and 3.04 mm (♀), respectively. Live coloration brown black ( Fig. 18A View Fig ); antennae, paraterga and legs dark brown. Coloration in alcohol after one year of preservation blackish, paraterga dark brown; venter and a few basal podomeres light brown to yellow-brown, legs increasingly darker brown distally ( Fig. 18 View Fig B–J).
HEAD. Clypeolabral region and vertex sparsely setose, epicranial suture distinct. Antennae rather short ( Fig. 18A View Fig ), extending behind body segment 3 (Ƌ) or 2 (♀) when stretched dorsally. In width, head <segment 3 <4 <5 <collum <segment 2 <6–16 (Ƌ, ♀); thereafter body gently and gradually tapering. Collum with three transverse rows of setae: 4+4 anterior, 1+1 intermediate and 3+3 posterior; with a small lateral incision near midway ( Fig. 18B, D View Fig ); caudal corner of paraterga very broadly rounded, declined ventrad, not surpassing rear tergal margin.
BODY. Tegument dull, shining, prozonae finely shagreened; metaterga often roughly microgranulate and rugulose, leathery; surface below paraterga more delicately, but still sufficiently clearly microgranulate and rugulose ( Fig. 18 View Fig A–F, H). Metaterga with two transverse rows of small setigerous cones: 2+ 2 in anterior (pre-sulcus) row and 3+3 setae usually borne on low, oblong, rounded tubercles in posterior (post-sulcus) row, except for metaterga 17–19, these latter bearing 3(2)+3(2) setae in anterior row and 4+ 4 in posterior row. Tergal setae simple, slender, often abraded, about as long as 1/3 of metazonite.Axial line visible both on pro- and metazonae. Paraterga strongly developed ( Fig. 18B, D, F View Fig ), especially so in Ƌ, set high (at upper ¼ of body height), anterior edge rounded and narrowly bordered, fused to callus; caudal corner very narrowly rounded, extending increasingly behind rear tergal margin, posterior edge slightly oblique. Calluses on paraterga delimited by a sulcus only dorsally. Paratega 2 broad, anterior edge angular, lateral edge with three evident incisions. Lateral edge of following paraterga with a clear incision in anterior 1/3 ( Fig. 18B, D, F View Fig ). Paraterga 16–19 with caudal corner extending increasingly caudally, tip clearly curved mesad ( Fig. 18F View Fig ). Ozopores evident, lateral, lying in an ovoid groove at about 1/ 3 in front of posterior edge of metaterga. Transverse sulcus distinct ( Fig. 18B, D, F View Fig ), slightly incomplete on segments 4 and 18, complete on segments 5–17, narrow, wave-shaped, rather deep, not reaching bases of paraterga, ribbed at bottom. Stricture between pro- and metazonae evident, wide, deep, ribbed at bottom down to base of paraterga ( Fig. 18 View Fig B–G). Pleurosternal carinae complete crests with a sharp caudal tooth on segments 2–4 (Ƌ, ♀), increasingly reduced to a front bulge and a caudal tooth until segment 7, retained only as a sharp caudal tooth until segment 16, thereafter missing (Ƌ), or increasingly reduced and remaining only a sharp caudal tooth until segment 15, thereafter missing (♀) ( Fig. 18C, E, H View Fig ). Epiproct ( Fig. 18 View Fig F–H) conical, flattened dorsoventrally, with two evident, rounded, apical papillae; tip subtruncate; lateral pre-apical papillae large, lying close to tip. Hypoproct roundly subtriangular, setigerous knobs at caudal edge small and well-separated ( Fig. 18G View Fig ).
STERNA. Sparsely setose, with a small, but evident cone caudally near each coxa, rear cones being a little larger than fore ones ( Fig. 19C View Fig ); cross-impressions shallow; a large, central, slightly bifid, setose lobe between Ƌ coxae 4 ( Fig. 18I – J View Fig ). Legs long and slender, midbody ones ca 1.2–1.4 (Ƌ) or 1.1–1.2 (♀) as long as body height; legs of Ƌ segments 5–17 with femur showing a field of ventral microgranulations, while postfemur, tibia and tarsus each with 1–3 minute adenostyles (tubercles), prefemora not swollen ( Fig. 19G View Fig ), Ƌ telopodites with particularly dense short setae ventrally ( Fig. 19G View Fig ), tarsal brushes present until body segment 8.
GONOPOD. Rather complex ( Figs 19A – B View Fig , 20 View Fig ); coxa slightly curved caudad, sparsely setose distoventrally. Femorite slightly curved and stout, with an evident mesal groove and a clear distolateral sulcus demarcating a postfemoral part; process h high, strongly twisted, tip evidently bifid; process m short; process z rather long, sausage-shaped; solenophore (sph) large, strongly coiled, expanded distally, flattened and clearly bifid; process x large, dentiform and pointed dorsally.
Remarks
This species has been found under stones, each specimen located in its own burrow of ca 30 cm long under its own stone and forming a kind of small cavern, all in the Plain of Jars, Laos.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Paradoxosomatidae |
Tribe |
Sulciferini |
Genus |