Namalycastis sp.

Ibrahim, Nur Fazne, Ibrahim, Yusof Shuaib, Kan, Kotaro & Sato, Masanori, 2024, Nereidid polychaetes (Annelida) inhabiting the inside of decaying fronds of the mangrove palm Nypa fruticans in a tropical estuary in Malaysia, with special reference to the life history of the dominant species, Namalycastis sp., Journal of Natural History 58 (45 - 48), pp. 2043-2074 : 2064-2068

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2024.2404472

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E8B90C-2A62-FFA1-FF3C-FF28FEF9E39A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Namalycastis sp.
status

 

Life-history characteristics of Namalycastis sp. inhabiting the decaying fronds of Nypa fruticans

Sex ratio and body size of females and males

Coelomic contents of a total of 507 individuals of Namalycastis sp. were examined. Sex could be determined for 209 individuals of them (43%), as 114 females with spherical oocytes (22%, Figure 3 View Figure 3 (a)) and 99 males with sperm or clusters of spermatogonia or spermatocytes (21%, Figure 3 View Figure 3 (b)), whereas the sex of 225 individuals without sexual products could not be determined (57%) ( Figure 15 View Figure 15 ). The sex ratio (no. of females/no. of males) was 1.15. We could not find any hermaphrodite individuals with both female and male products.

BW of females (average ± standard deviation (SD), range: 2.97± 0.66 mm, 1.3–5.4 mm) and males (2.99± 0.71 mm, 1.5–5.2 mm) were not significantly different (Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, p =0.83), and both of them were significantly larger than individuals with sex undetermined (1.94± 0.42 mm, 1.1–3.0 mm) (p <0.0001) ( Figure 15 View Figure 15 ). BL of complete specimens (range: 20–340 mm) was positively correlated with BW according to the following regression formula ( Figure 16 View Figure 16 ): BL=5.8 BW - 4.4 (r=0.80, p <0.05, n =277).

Seasonal variation of body-size distribution

Profiles of size–frequency histograms of seven months were relatively similar throughout the year from September 2015 to September 2016, with a mode ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 mm BW ( Figure 17 View Figure 17 ). Females and males with coelomic sexual products occurred throughout the year, whereas juveniles with BW less than 1.3 mm occurred only in the period from February to July 2016, with the number of juveniles less than 10% of each population ( Figure 18 View Figure 18 ).

Average BWs of both males and females were largest in November 2015 (3.1 mm and 3.3 mm, respectively), and smallest in May 2016 (2.4 mm and 2.7 mm, respectively) ( Figure 19 View Figure 19 ). Average BW of individuals with sex unknown was largest in September 2015 (2.4 mm), and smallest in March 2016 (1.8 mm).

Seasonality of reproduction

Ovigerous females occurred throughout the year, with ovigerous rate (number of ovigerous females/number of adults) relatively high (20–28%) in September and November in 2015 and from May to September in 2016, and low (8–9%) in February and March in 2016 ( Figure 20 View Figure 20 ).

The mean oocyte diameter ( OD) in ovigerous females was highest in November 2015 (83µm) and September 2016 (87µm), and lowest in February 2016 (35µm), increasing from March to September in 2016 in a similar pattern to the ovigerous rate ( Figure 20 View Figure 20 ) . The largest value of OD (140µm) was recorded from a female collected from Sta. 1 in November 2015. Ovigerous females containing large oocytes with a mean diameter larger than 100µm occurred only in November 2015, and July and September 2016 ( Figure 21 View Figure 21 ). The mean OD (µm) was positively correlated with the body width of the ovigerous females (BW mm) according to the following regression formula ( Figure 22 View Figure 22 ): OD=22.1BW+9.5 (r=0.69, p <0.01, n =110).

Only a single male containing mature sperm was found, in November 2015.

Fecundity

The numbers of coelomic oocytes per 10 chaetigers in ovigerous females (NO) were in a range from 380 to 21,000, and positively correlated with the body width of the ovigerous females (BW mm) according to the following regression formula ( Figure 23 View Figure 23 ): NO=349 e0.85BW (r=0.69, p <0.01, n =110).

Seasonal variation in salinity and temperature in the habitat

The mean salinity of the surface water in the six sampling sites was highly variable during our sampling period from September 2015 to September 2016, ranging from 7 psu (range: 3.5–8.4 psu) in November 2015 to 32 psu (27.5–33.9 psu) in May 2016, whereas the mean temperature was almost consistent in the same period, ranging from 28°C (26.4–29.4°C) in November 2015 to 31°C (30.1–33.2°C) in September 2015 ( Figure 24 View Figure 24 (a)).

During our sampling period, the highest monthly rainfall amount (514 mm) was recorded in November 2015 in the monsoon season, and the lowest monthly rainfall amount (21 mm) was recorded in March 2016 in the dry season, according to the data from Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station Data ( CHIRPS) ( Figure 24 View Figure 24 (b)) .

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF