Chalcophora fortis LeConte, 1860
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065x-67.4.457 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E82E51-7853-FFE9-6BD0-39ADFE54E491 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Chalcophora fortis LeConte, 1860 |
status |
|
Chalcophora fortis LeConte, 1860 View in CoL ( Figs. 5 View Figs , 10 View Figs , 11 View Figs , 23, 24 View Figs )
Chalcophora fortis LeConte, 1860: 191 View in CoL .
Chalcophora laurentica Casey, 1909: 82 View in CoL (synonymized by Leng 1920: 179).
Chalcophora cupreola Casey, 1914: 360 View in CoL (synonymized by Leng 1920: 179).
For complete synonymy, see Bellamy (2008).
Diagnosis. The largest of the North American Chalcophora (26–33 mm), this coppery green species is easily distinguished from all other species by the single weak, longitudinal ridge present on the posterior face of the protibia ( Fig. 13 View Figs ) as well as by the shape of the aedeagus. The parameres of the aedeagus are wide, wrapping around the median lobe ( Figs. 23–24 View Figs ).
Redescription. M a le. L e n g t h 2 6–3 3 m m, width 12–16 mm at widest point. Blackish, with metallic green-copper luster dorsally; shiny bronze to metallic green ventrally. Head deeply incised medially, heavily punctate, sparsely setose. Antenna dark brown; arising just inside inner margin of eye; antennomeres with sparse setae apically. Pronotum widest in basal two-thirds; lateral borders subparallel, heavily crenulate in apical one-third; with fringe anteriorly; anterior angles acute, projecting forward around head; dorsal surface heavily sculptured, with depressed patches of dense punctation interspersed with smooth, black elevations; pronotal elevations narrow; elevation pattern variable. Protibia with broad tooth apically, lacking prominent longitudinal ridges posteriorly or with one very weak ridge, with two short apical spines. Tibia and femora sparsely, evenly punctate and lightly setose; tibiae with tuft of setae apically; line of setae extends along the length of the tibia. Prosternal process expanded posterior to procoxae, with two longitudinal grooves. Elytra subparallel, narrowing in apical one-third. Elytron heavily sculptured, with depressed patches of dense punctation interspersed with smooth black elevations; elytral elevations narrow; elytral sculpturing variable; posterolateral border weakly to strongly ser- rate. Elytral apex trunate to broadly rounded, with weak sutural spine or sutural spine absent. Ventrally setose; ventrites evenly punctate, posterior border smooth; apical ventrite with deep V-shaped notch posteriorly. Aedeagus with parameres wide, wrapping around median lobe, with tuft of setae apically; tegmen deeply incised medially; median lobe wide, apex acute (approximately 70°), with two lateral ridges dorsally.
Female. Generally larger; last ventrite rounded posteriorly, notch absent.
Variation. Compared to other species in the genus, C. fortis displays very little variation. The
size, color, and density of setae ventrally vary only slightly, though sculpturing patterns vary considerably from individual to individual.
Type Material Examined. C h a l c o p h o r a laurentica – “ Ont./ CASEY; bequest; 1925/ TYPE USNM; 35739/ laurentica; Csy./ LECTO- TYPE; CHALCOPHORA ; laurentica ♂; Casey; 1989; C.L. Bellamy ” ( USNM). “Ont./ CASEY; bequest; 1925 / TYPE USNM; 35739 / laurentica – 2; Csy. / PARA-LECTOTYPE; CHALCOPHORA ; laurentica; Casey; 1989; C.L. Bellamy ” ( USNM). “Ont. / CASEY; bequest; 1925 / TYPE USNM; 35739 / laurentica –- 3; Csy. / PARA-LECTOTYPE; CHALCOPHORA ; laurentica; Casey; 1989; C.L. Bellamy ” ( USNM) .
HOLOTYPE: C. cupreola – “Kas. / CASEY; bequest; 1925 / TYPE USNM; 35740 / cupreola Csy. ” ( USNM).
Other Material Examined. 23 specimens (see Maier 2010, Appendix C).
Notes. Chalcophora fortis appears to be a very distinct species, with a range restricted to northern and eastern North America.
Host Records. Pinus strobus L. ( Nelson et al. 2008).
Distribution. CANADA: Ontario, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Quebec. USA: Connecticut, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Wisconsin.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chalcophora fortis LeConte, 1860
Maier, Crystal A. & Ivie, Michael A. 2013 |
Chalcophora cupreola
Leng 1920: 179 |
Casey 1914: 360 |
Chalcophora laurentica
Leng 1920: 179 |
Casey 1909: 82 |