Rhizoprionodon, GANNTOURENSIS, WHITLEY, 1929

Cicimurri, David J. & Knight, James L., 2019, Late Eocene (Priabonian) elasmobranchs from the Dry Branch Formation (Barnwell Group) of Aiken County, South Carolina, USA, PaleoBios 36, pp. 1-31 : 10

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5070/P9361043964

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3F95876E-933FF-48AF-9CF0-A840A333220B

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13750212

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E787A6-FE22-FF8D-A989-FA34FAD2FD8C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Rhizoprionodon
status

 

RHIZOPRIONODON View in CoL ? GANNTOURENSIS ( ARAMBOURG, 1952)

( FIG. 3J–L View Figure 3 )

Referred specimens —SC96.97.2, four teeth; SC 2001.1.18, tooth; SC 2001.1.19, 40 teeth;SC2013.38.98, anterior tooth ( Fig. 3J, K View Figure 3 );SC2013.38.99, lateral tooth ( Fig. 3L View Figure 3 ); SC2013.38.100, 18 teeth; SC2013.38.101, 32 teeth; SC2013.38.102, eight posterior teeth; SC2013.38.103, eight distal lateral teeth.

Remarks —One hundred thirteen Dry Branch Formation teeth are similar to those of extant Rhizoprionodon , and to Eocene Rhiz. ganntourensis, in particular. The distal heel of Rhizoprionodon , including Rhiz. ganntourensis, is generally cuspidate ( Arambourg 1952, Herman et al. 1991, Case et al. 1996, Noubhani and Cappetta 1997, Mustafa et al. 2005), but our specimens lack enameloid and this feature is not preserved. However, we examined a tooth of Rhiz. sp. cf. Rhiz. ganntourensis that was recovered by Zullo and Kite (1985) from the Griffins Landing Sand (see Appendix 1), and found that it is very similar to the material listed above. The well preserved Griffins Landing Sand tooth exhibits a cuspidate distal heel, but the translucent enameloid allows us to view the unifromly convex dentine core of the heel, as can be seen on the specimens in our sample.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF