Rhizoprionodon, GANNTOURENSIS, WHITLEY, 1929
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5070/P9361043964 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3F95876E-933FF-48AF-9CF0-A840A333220B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13750212 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E787A6-FE22-FF8D-A989-FA34FAD2FD8C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhizoprionodon |
status |
|
RHIZOPRIONODON View in CoL ? GANNTOURENSIS ( ARAMBOURG, 1952)
( FIG. 3J–L View Figure 3 )
Referred specimens —SC96.97.2, four teeth; SC 2001.1.18, tooth; SC 2001.1.19, 40 teeth;SC2013.38.98, anterior tooth ( Fig. 3J, K View Figure 3 );SC2013.38.99, lateral tooth ( Fig. 3L View Figure 3 ); SC2013.38.100, 18 teeth; SC2013.38.101, 32 teeth; SC2013.38.102, eight posterior teeth; SC2013.38.103, eight distal lateral teeth.
Remarks —One hundred thirteen Dry Branch Formation teeth are similar to those of extant Rhizoprionodon , and to Eocene Rhiz. ganntourensis, in particular. The distal heel of Rhizoprionodon , including Rhiz. ganntourensis, is generally cuspidate ( Arambourg 1952, Herman et al. 1991, Case et al. 1996, Noubhani and Cappetta 1997, Mustafa et al. 2005), but our specimens lack enameloid and this feature is not preserved. However, we examined a tooth of Rhiz. sp. cf. Rhiz. ganntourensis that was recovered by Zullo and Kite (1985) from the Griffins Landing Sand (see Appendix 1), and found that it is very similar to the material listed above. The well preserved Griffins Landing Sand tooth exhibits a cuspidate distal heel, but the translucent enameloid allows us to view the unifromly convex dentine core of the heel, as can be seen on the specimens in our sample.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.