Zodarion sharurensis, Zamani & Marusik, 2022

Zamani, Alireza & Marusik, Yuri M., 2022, New taxonomic data on Zodariinae (Araneae: Zodariidae) of Azerbaijan, Iran Afghanistan and Pakistan, Zootaxa 5155 (3), pp. 423-438 : 435-438

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5155.3.7

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F5C7AA93-FE9B-4940-AD7E-EAB4A1564E42

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6814877

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687D5-EB3C-FFD4-E8EF-65C6FA97FE9F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Zodarion sharurensis
status

sp. nov.

Zodarion sharurensis sp. n.

Figs 11A–G View FIGURE 11 , 12A–F View FIGURE 12 , 13A–B View FIGURE 13

Type material. Holotype ♂ and paratype 1♀ ( ZMMU), AZERBAIJAN: Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic: Sharur dist., Akhura , 39°34'N 45°11'E, 02.06.2003 (E. F. Guseinov). GoogleMaps

Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the name of the type locality.

Diagnosis. The male of the new species differs from all species considered in Zodarion by twisted RTA ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ) (vs. uncoiled in other species), and the presence of retrolateral cymbial (Ce) and tegular (Te and Pe) extensions. The female of Z. sharurensis sp. n. has epigyne similar to those in Z. abantense Wunderlich, 1980 and Z. talyschicum Dunin & Nenilin, 1897 by having round, widely separated receptacles and straight (i.e. uncoiled) copulatory ducts. It can be differentiated from both species by having receptacles separated by 3.3 diameters (vs. 2.7). Furthermore, from Z. abantense it differs by fovea with parallel margins (vs. triangular) and distinct (i.e. well sclerotized) copulatory ducts visible through integument (vs. indistinct). It can also be diagnosed from Z. talyschicum by wider epigynal fovea (2 times longer than wide vs. 3 times longer than wide).

Description. Male. Habitus as in Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 . Total length 1.90. Carapace 0.88 long, 0.70 wide. Eye sizes: AME: 0.08, ALE: 0.07, PME: 0.06, PLE: 0.05. Carapace, sternum, chelicerae, labium and maxillae yellowish brown. Legs slightly lighter than carapace, without annulations. Abdomen dorsally dark grayish and with pale median band; pale beige ventrally. Spinnerets uniformly pale beige. Measurements of legs: I: 2.82 (0.66, 0.31, 0.65, 0.67, 0.53), II: 2.52 (0.65, 0.29, 0.52, 0.59, 0.47), III: 2.42 (0.62, 0.30, 0.49, 0.59, 0.42), IV: 3.47 (0.88, 0.34, 0.79, 0.96, 0.50).

Palp as in Figs 12A–D View FIGURE 12 , 13A–B View FIGURE 13 ; femur 3.25 times longer than wide, as long as cymbium; patella as long as wide, with 2 modified short and thick dorsal setae ( Figs 12B View FIGURE 12 , 13B View FIGURE 13 ); tibia wider than long, with large RTA about 2 times longer than tibia and with swollen basal part (Br) and thin terminal part (Tr) twisted around its axis at about 150º, and round tip directed anterodorsally; cymbium elongate, 2 times longer than wide, with retrobasal extension (Ce); bulb elongate, about 1.6 times longer than wide; tegulum with cylindrical extension in meso-retrolateral (Te) and posterior (Pe) parts; tegular apophysis (Ta) 1.3 times longer than wide; conductor (Co) relatively broad (Fig. 14A); embolus (Em) originating at about 6 o’clock position and terminating at a 12 o’clock position, base (Eb) very wide, terminal half filamentous, tip slightly widened.

Female. Habitus as in Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 . Total length 2.35. Carapace 0.90 long, 0.70 wide. Eye sizes: AME: 0.08, ALE: 0.06, PME: 0.05, PLE: 0.04. Coloration as in male. Measurements of legs: Fe I: 0.67, II: Fe 0.58, Pa 0.23, Ti 0.51, Mt 0.51, Fe III: 0.56, Fe IV: 0.78, unlisted segments missing

Epigyne as in Fig. 11A–G View FIGURE 11 ; epigynal plate about 2.6 times wider than long, with distinct fovea (Fo) 1.5 times longer than wide; anterior hood (Ah) arched; copulatory openings (Oc) located inside fovea; copulatory ducts (Cd) long, more than 2 times longer than fovea’s width, and about 9 times longer than wide; receptacles (Re) globular, their diameter as long as fovea’s width, separated by about 4 diameters.

Note. The generic placement is tentative, and this species most likely belongs to an undescribed genus.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, Azerbaijan.

ZMMU

Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Zodariidae

SubFamily

Zodariinae

Genus

Zodarion

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF