Cheiracanthiidae, Wagner, 1887
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2021.46.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E59B3D-DD64-B76E-FF7D-6B74FB7A753E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cheiracanthiidae |
status |
|
Cheiracanthiidae View in CoL View at ENA
Relationships within this small group remain obscure. Wolf (1991) discusses Cheiracanthium pennyi and C. erraticum as being more similar to each other than C. erraticum and C. virescens , contra Helsdingen (1979). Barcodes for C. pennyi are not available, so the molecular data cannot help resolving the case. The pedipalp without ridge and the epigynum with short insemination ducts set C. pennyi apart, but these could be autapomorphic. The striking red dorsal line of the opisthosoma is shared by C. pennyi and C. erraticum , but here the loss in C. virescens could be autapomorphic. The preferred topology represented in the tree gives precedence to the genital similarities, but without a sound cladistic basis for this decision.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |