Cryptosporidium
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.10.001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E4D91D-FFFC-FF81-FFBB-FD0A9189FD76 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cryptosporidium |
status |
|
3.1. Genotyping and subtyping Cryptosporidium View in CoL
Among 149 snakes, 15 were positive to Cryptosporidium with an infection prevalence of 10.1% ( Table 2). BLAST analysis indicated that the sequences from the snakes belonged to three Cryptosporidium species. Ten sequences were 99.88–100% identical to each other and were identified as C. baileyi (6.7%, 10/149), three were 100% identical to C. parvum (2%, 3/149) and two were 100% identical to C. serpentis (1.3%, 2/149). Phylogenetic analysis using the four representative sequences also showed Cryptosporidium identifies in the present study clustered with C. baileyi , C. parvum and C. serpentis respectively ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). The three C. parvum sequences had 100% homology to previous isolates derived from dairy cattle (MF671870) in China. Of the ten C. baileyi sequences, seven were 99.88% homologous to previous isolates from quails (DQ89816) in China, and three were 100% homologous to previous isolates from chickens (JX548296) in Zhejiang Province and ducks (AY954882) in Henan Province, China. The two C. serpentis sequences were 100% homologous to previous isolates derived from the oriental rat snake Ptyas mucosus (KJ651433). The C. parvum samples were further subtyped with gp60 gene sequence. Two positive samples were 100% homologous with previous sequences of subtype IIdA15G1 from sheep (MH794167) in Xinjiang, China.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.