Stenus aureolus Fauvel, 1875
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2020.043 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:33D1CD77-7BC6-4083-8FD7-8F7DDAE309A6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E34929-6453-FF9B-D951-FE93FC149631 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Stenus aureolus Fauvel, 1875 |
status |
|
Stenus aureolus Fauvel, 1875 View in CoL
( Figs 1 View Figs 1–5 , 11–14 View Figs 11–18 )
Stenus aureolus Fauvel, 1875 View in CoL : XVII.
Stenus fluviatilis Benick, 1921: 140 : PඎඍΗඓ (1967: 241; synonymized with S. aureolus View in CoL ).
Stenus ambiseminiger Zhao & Zhou, 2006:286 , syn. nov. (previously erronerously synonymized with S.trigonuroides View in CoL by PඎඍΗඓ (2008:173)). Material examined. RUSSIA: KΗൺൻൺඋඈඏඌĸ: 1 ♀, Bolshe-Khekhtsyrsky, Reserve, 6–10.vi.1990, 400– 450 m, W. Schawaller leg. (VPSG); 1 J, Slavianka, 20 km N of Troitskoye, 14–19.vi.1990, Amur bank, W. Schawaller leg. (VPSG); 1 J 1 ♀, East Siberia, Irkutsk Territory, Angarsk, 2.vii.2008, I.V. Enustschenko leg. (VPSG); 1 J, East Siberia, Irkutsk Territory, Katangskiy district,Podvoloshino, valley of Nizhnyaya, 4–9.viii.2008, Tunguska R., Shavrin A. & Enustschenko I leg. (VPSG). CHINA: HൾංඅඈඇǤඃංൺඇǤ: 3JJ, Yichun City, Fenlin County, 9.vii.2004, Li-Zhen Li leg. (SHNU); 1 ♀, Yichun, Wuying, Wuying Forest Park, 11.vii.2004, Huang Jia-Jie leg. (SHNU); 1 ♀, Huma County, Houhei Town, 580 m, 15.vii.2009, Li & Liu leg. (SHNU). Jංඅංඇ: 3 JJ 4 ♀♀, Korean pine forest, Mt. Changbai, 23.vii.2004, Li & Huang leg. (SHNU). NൾංආൾඇǤǤඎ: 1 ♀, Hulunbeier City, Erlunchun Ganhe-Kuerbin, 570 m, 16.vii.2009, Li & Liu leg. (SHNU); 1 ♀, Tahe-Mohe County, 500–600 m, 16.vii.2009, Li & Liu leg. (SHNU); 6 JJ 8 ♀♀, Xiaoyangqi Town, Daxing’anling, 9.viii.2011, Xu Wang leg. (SHNU).
Previously published records from China. HൾංඅඈඇǤඃංൺඇǤ: Langxiang, Qingyuan (ZΗൺඈ & ZΗඈඎ 2006, as Stenus ambiseminiger ).
Differential diagnosis. Stenus aureolus Fauvel, 1875 is extremely similar to S. trigonuroides Zheng, 1993 in most aspects. The ratio of HW/EW in S. aureolus is slightly smaller than that of S. trigonuroides . The hind wings of S. aureolus are 1.27–1.39 times as long as elytra, i.e. shorter than those of S trigonuroides (1.88–3.19 times as long as elytra). The aedeagus of S. aureolus ( Fig. 12 View Figs 11–18 ) is almost the same as in S. trigonuroides ( Fig. 16 View Figs 11–18 ), though the length of apical sclerotized area of median lobe is slightly shorter in S. aureolus . The spermathecae of these two species are clearly different: the spermatheca is simple without coiled parts in S. aureolus ( Fig. 14 View Figs 11–18 ), but has complicated coiled parts in S. trigonuroides ( Fig. 18 View Figs 11–18 ). Stenus aureolus is also very similar to S. paratrigonuroides sp. nov. in most aspects. The length of the apical sclerotized area of the median lobe of S. aureolus is slightly shorter and narrower than that of S. paratrigonuroides ( Fig. 39 View Figs 34–41 ). The spermatheca is simple in S. aureolus while it is coiled in S. paratrigonuroides ( Fig. 41 View Figs 34–41 ). Additionally, the distributional ranges of the S. aureolus and S. paratrigonuroides are seperated by that of S. trigonuroides ( Fig. 46 View Fig ).
Redescription. Measurements. BL: 3.5–4.2 mm, FL: 1.8–2.1 mm. HW: 0.77–0.87 mm, PL: 0.57–0.68 mm, PW: 0.59–0. 68 mm, EL: 0.76–0.87 mm, EW: 0.77–0.91 mm, SL: 0.56–0.68 mm. Head 0.92–1.01 times as wide as elytra; pronotum 0.93–1.00 times as long as wide; elytra 0.94–0.99 times as long as wide; hind wings 1.27–1.39 times as long as elytra.
Male. Mesotibiae and metatibiae each with a tooth on inner side of apex; sternite VIII with triangular emargination in middle of posterior margin; sternite IX ( Fig. 13 View Figs 11–18 ) with distinct apicolateral projections, posterior margin serrate. Aedeagus ( Figs 11, 12 View Figs 11–18 ) slender; apical sclerotized area of median lobe medium in length and pointed at tip; expulsion clasps slender, strongly sclerotized; copulatory tube long and broad; parameres much longer than median lobe, swollen in apical parts, each with two groups of setae on apico-internal margins: 15–20 setae in distal and 6 or 7 setae in basal group.
Female. Sternite VIII prominent in middle of posterior margin; spermatheca ( Fig. 14 View Figs 11–18 ) sclerotized with basal porch bilobed, spermatheca duct simple without coiled parts, capsule small.
Distribution. China (Heilongjiang, Jilin, Neimenggu), Russia, Mongolia. New species for China.
Remark on synonymy. Stenus ambiseminiger Zhao & Zhou, 2006 was synomized with S. trigonuroides by PඎඍΗඓ (2008). However, the shape of the spermatheca illustrated in the original description of S. ambiseminiger perfectly fits that of S. aureolus . The type locality of S. ambiseminiger (Heilongjiang: Langxiang, Qingyuan) is within the distribution range of S. aureolus . In contrast, S. trigonuroides has not been found in North West China yet. For these reasons, S. ambiseminiger is synomized with S. aureolus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenus aureolus Fauvel, 1875
Shuai, Qi, Tang, Liang & Luo, Yong-Ting 2020 |
Stenus ambiseminiger
ZHAO C. - Y. & ZHOU H. - Z. 2006: 286 |
Stenus fluviatilis
BENICK L. 1921: 140 |