Paecilaema, C. L. Koch, 1839
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4521.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:310328BA-0AFB-4000-B8F1-F92F2802E5DA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6495121 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E187E6-FFE5-9F5B-57C4-678CFB42FD79 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paecilaema |
status |
|
Paecilaema View in CoL u-flavum ( Perty, 1833)
( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 9–13 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 )
Cosmetus View in CoL U-flavum Perty 1833: 203; Lucas 1840: 48. Cosmetus View in CoL u-flavum: Gervais 1844: 115 [“Cosmète u-fauve”]. Paecilima U-flavum: C.L. Koch 1839a: 104, pl. 246, fig. 584. Paecilaema View in CoL U-flavum: C.L. Koch 1839b: 21; Roewer 1923: 373, fig. 453; Roewer 1928a: 597; Mello-Leitão 1932: 85, fig. 54. Poecilaema View in CoL U-flavum: Simon 1879a: 193. Poecilima u-flavum: Canestrini 1888: 106, pl. 9, fig. 2. Poecilaema View in CoL U-flavum: Roewer 1912: 99; Mello-Leitão 1923: 114. Paecilaema limbatum Kollar in C.L. Koch 1839b: 21 View in CoL ; Kollar in C.L. Koch 1840: 107, pl. 247, fig. 585; Roewer 1923: 372, fig.
451 (tagged as incertae sedis); Roewer 1928: 605; Mello-Leitão 1932: 84, fig. 53. Syn. nov. Poecilaema limbatum: Simon 1879: 191 . Poecilaema limbatum: Roewer 1912: 89 ; Mello-Leitão 1923: 113; Strand 1926: 45. Eucynorta brasiliensis Mello-Leitão 1923: 111 View in CoL , fig. 3; Roewer 1928: 583, fig. 24; Mello-Leitão 1932: 64, fig. 29. Syn. nov. Poecilaemula brasiliensis: B. Soares 1944a: 264 (syn. = Poecilaemula punctilineata Mello-Leitão, 1935 ; = Poecilaema
ornatissimum Mello-Leitão, 1942); B. Soares 1944b: 312 (rectif. type-loc.); B. Soares 1945a: 227 (specim. catal.); B.
Soares 1946: 488 (specim. catal.). Paecilaemula brasiliensis: B. Soares 1944c: 145 (in part, material from ES, non Mello-Leitão, 1923 —misidentification). Metavononoides brasiliensis: Kury 2003: 71 . Paecilaemula bella Mello-Leitão 1932: 443 , fig. suppl. 4. Syn. nov. Poecilaemula bella: B. Soares 1944a: 266 ; B. Soares 1945b: 344. Metavononoides bellus: Kury 2003: 71 . Poecilaema soerenseni Henriksen 1932: 332 ; Mello-Leitão 1935b: 115 [junior subjective synonymy of Paecilaemula bella
Mello-Leitão, 1932 by Kury (2003a)]. Syn. nov. Poecilaemula soesenseni: Mello-Leitão 1933: 110 .
Type data. Cosmetus u-flavum: type(s) (ZSM, lost), from BRAZIL, without further locality data. ♂ neotype (MNRJ 3433), Brazil, RJ, Duque de Caxias, Parque Natural Municipal da Taquara, 10.iv.2017, A.B. Kury, L. Ázara, M. Medrano leg.— Paecilaema limbatum : 1 ♂ 1 ♀ syntypes (NHMW), from BRAZIL, without further locality data (not examined).— Eucynorta brasiliensis : ♀ holotype (MZSP 457, examined), BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro, Piraí: Pinheiral.— Paecilaemula bella : 3 syntypes, only 1 ♀ remaining (MNRJ 1376, examined), BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.— P. bella : Rio de Janeiro: Jacarepaguá.— Paecilaema soerenseni : 4 ♂ 6 ♀ syntypes (ZMUC and BMNH, examined), from BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro, [Itaocara, Fazenda] Serra Vermelha [misspelled by Sørensen, as “Serra Veruzella”] (21°44'S 42°01'W).
Qualifying conditions for the neotype designation. The ICZN Code Art. 75.3 establishes a list of seven particulars to be observed, plus the need for a statement of an exceptional need, all of which follow: The need for the designation of a neotype in this case is acute, because otherwise the most important genus in the family Cosmetidae is used in a loosely defined way, allowing a plethora of unrelated species to be referred to it and thus depleting any taxonomic information contained in the name Paecilaema . The particulars: (1) the neotype is designated here with the express purpose of clarifying the taxonomic status of Cosmetus u-flavus and consequently of the genus Paecilaema ; (2) the characters that we regard as differentiating from other taxa the nominal speciesgroup taxon are explicit in the key above and in the diagnosis below; (3) data and description sufficient to ensure recognition of the specimen designated are provided here in the description section; (4) we know that the namebearing type specimen is lost as informed by the curator of ZSM; (5) the neotype is consistent with what is known of the former name-bearing type from the original description especially because of the stress put in the yellow Latin U mask; (6) the neotype came as nearly as practicable from the original type locality as explained above, judging from the itinerary of the original collecting expedition; (7) the neotype is the property of the Museu Nacional/UFRJ, a recognized scientific and educational institution, which is the most important natural history museum in Latin America as well as the second most important collection of harvestmen in the world, second only to the Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt.
Records. BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro, Teresópolis: Colônia Alpina (Sørensen, 1932, as P. soerenseni ) . Rio de Janeiro: Alto da Boa Vista ; Nova Friburgo ( Kury 2003, as M. bellus ) .
Doubtful / unconfirmed records. BRAZIL, Amazonas, Tefé ( Simon 1879a, as P. limbatum ). PANAMA, Cerro Flores ( Petrunkevitch 1925: 60; Roewer 1928, as P. limbatum ). BRAZIL, Espírito Santo, Colatina: São José River ( B. Soares 1944c, as Paecilaemula brasiliensis ). Cosmetus u-flavum: [ ARGENTINA?] “Southern Chaco ” ( Canestrini 1888). Cosmetus u-flavum: Mello-Leitão (1932) cites “Mato Grosso” without explicit evidence.
Diagnosis. Scutal area III with a pair of paramedian spines (as opposed to unarmed in P. muticum ); spines of scutal area III high, bluntly conical and much thicker at basal part ( Figs 9C, E, F View FIGURE 9 , as in P. lyra , P. melanacanthum , P. preciosum , P. renneri ). Anal operculum of males with one pair of paramedian parallel tubercles sharing the same base, amidst smaller tubercles ( Figs 9C, D View FIGURE 9 , 10C View FIGURE 10 , as opposed to unarmed in P. albosigillatum and P. ornatissimum ; with a triangle of three acuminate tubercles in P. preciosum and P. muticum ). Branches of lyre independent, not connected by sunken trabeculae ( Figs 9B View FIGURE 9 , 10A View FIGURE 10 , as in P. albosigillatum , P. muticum , P. ornatissimum , P. peculiare ). Diaphanous body of lyre entire: posterior half of body as well marked as anterior half ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 , as opposed to P. albisectum and P. albosigillatum in which the posterior part of lyre is hollow), not invading the carapace (as in P. ornatissimum ). Lyre barely reaching lateral borders of prosomal scutum; individual solid punctulations not coalescent ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 , coalescent in P. preciosum and P. muticum ); FM rounded, as an open heater shield (as in P. peculiare , and P. melanacanthum has a similar shape but FM is closed); FT triangular. A pair of yellow blots in the carapace near the eyes ( Fig. 9B View FIGURE 9 , absent in P. albisectum , P. preciosum and P. muticum ). Laterals of Cx IV without any blot ( Fig. 9C, P View FIGURE 9 . ornatissimum exhibits a single large blot on each side).
Description. Male neotype (MNRJ 3433).
Measurements. See Table 1.
Color (in ethanol). Background of body ventral and dorsal and Cx I–IV: 55 (Strong Brown) with abundant darker mottling. Rims of free tergites and anal operculum fading into articular membrane: 68 (Strong Orange Yellow). Paired spines of scutal area III: 65 (Brownish Black). Tr to Ta of legs: 97 (Vivid Greenish Yellow) mottled in black. Solid punctulations of lyra: 104 (Pale Greenish Yellow); rest of lyra the same, but less dense, attenuated. Cx without any light blot.
Lyra. True lyra present, with set of 6 fenestrae and containing (1) diaphanous body, and (2) solid punctulations. Diaphanous body U-shaped with two subtly different shades of pale yellow—posterior half a bit more transparent; branches of the U densely perforated with larger apertures on the outside (lateral fenestrae), not connected to each other, and stretching frontwards to the laterals of carapace up to the level of ocularium where it is very narrow. FT triangular. FM more rounded, shaped as an anteriorly open heater shield. Lyre barely reaching lateral borders of prosomal scutum; individual solid punctulations round, not coalesced.
Dorsum. Gracile harvestman with slender legs ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 , 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Dorsal scutum in dorsal view type β with attenuate constrictions ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). Protoglyph and deutoglyph shallow but well-marked ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). Dorsal scutum in lateral view rising steadily from posterior and anterior borders to area III where it is the highest ( Figs 9C View FIGURE 9 , 10B View FIGURE 10 ). Scutal groove separating carapace from abdominal scutum broad and very shallow. No other grooves present on scutum, thus scutal areas only inferred by granulation pattern ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). All scutum unarmed, except for area III, armed with paramedian pair of large granulous blunt spines, with thick base, parallel to each other and gently tilted backwards ( Figs 9 View FIGURE 9 , 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Ocularium narrow and low, with gentle median depression; unarmed, with one granule row at each side ( Figs 9 View FIGURE 9 , 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Granules distributed on carapace on and behind ocularium, and on all abdominal scutum. Free tergites each with a transverse row of granules ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Anal operculum with two rows of small tubercles, with a pair of strong partly fused conical projections on a posterior row ( Fig. 10C View FIGURE 10 ).
Venter ( Figs 11E, F View FIGURE 11 ). Coxae I–III triangular, transverse to main body axis. Coxae II to IV connected by tubercular bridges. Ventral elements of coxa I: El1 = ca. 10 small tubercles forming a row; El2 = 5 large tubercles clustered, collinear with El1; El3 = 1 very large conical process, matching El4; El4 = 1 very large bifid process; El5 = 2 protuberances. Coxa IV pentagonal, greatly developed, oriented obliquely, but almost parallel to body axis. Stigmatic area T-shaped with stigmata large, unconcealed. Free sternites smooth and unarmed.
Chelicerae ( Figs 12A, B View FIGURE 12 ). Weak, with well-marked bulla. Posterior border of bulla lined with strong protuberances. Fixed finger with a row of 5 triangular teeth, movable finger with a row of 8 closely placed smaller teeth.
Pedipalps ( Figs 12C, D, E View FIGURE 12 ). Typical cosmetid Pp, with elongate Tr, foliaceus Fe; this is convex dorsally, with a dorsal row of 8 setiferous tubercles and a ventral row of 12 much more closely positioned setiferous tubercles. Ti only slightly convex to mesal side, with two ventro-marginal rows of small setae and two ventro-apical dentiform apophyses. Ta conical, with scattered dorsal setae and three well-marked ventral rows of subequal setae.
Legs. Cx IV surpassing dorsal scutum in dorsal view by all its extension; in situ reaching posterior border of FM (anterior limit of coda). All Fe straight. Fe, Ti and Mt I–IV slender and unarmed. Posterior tarsal claws unpectinate. Tarsal process (“pseudonychium” sensu Roewer) well-developed. Tarsal counts in Table 1.
Male genitalia ( Figs 12F, G, H View FIGURE 12 ). Apical truncus forming a flat podium from where the glans arises. Glans sac short, but dorsally protruded as a flat process, clearly folded into three regions. Stylus dorsally curved, with slit-like opening, ventrally forming a serrate caruncle (wattle) without notable curves or projections. VP of the penis subrectangular, with distal border straight and slightly concave on distal sides. From distal to proximal the lateral macrosetae are: C1–C2, D1–D2 and A1. MS C1-C2 large, contrasting with the others, and curved. MS, D1 and A1 very small, MS D2 minute. Microsetae of ventral side of VP absent.
Other material studied. BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro State: 1 ♂ ( MNRJ 06075 View Materials ), Angra dos Reis, Ilha Grande , on trunk/bushes, 15.xi.1985, R. Baptista leg. ; 1 ♂ ( MNRJ 02284 View Materials ), Barra de Guaratiba, Pedra da Tartaruga , hillside with almond trees, 20.viii.2010, A. B. Kury, A. Giupponi & G. Miranda leg. ; 4 ♂ 5 ♀ 7 juv. ( MNRJ 19193 View Materials ), Búzios, APA do Pau Brasil , 13-15.i.2011, B. Buzatto, A. Giupponi & A. Kury leg. ; 3 ♂ 2 ♀ ( MNRJ 02146 View Materials ), Guapimirim, Centro de Primatologia ( CEPRIM or CPRJ), pitfall, 16-23.ix.2004 ; 1 ♀ ( MNRJ 08474 View Materials ), Magé, Estrada Real, Raiz da Serra , 9.ii.2005, P. de Jesus leg. ; 2 ♀ ( MNRJ 19768 View Materials ), Mangaratiba, Ilha da Marambaia , 28.xi.2005, Claudio P. leg. ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀ ( MNRJ 06877 View Materials ), Nova Friburgo, Amparo, Auberge Suisse , foliage, 20.xi.1993, A.B. Kury leg. ; 2 ♂ 4 ♀ ( MNRJ 06326 View Materials ), Nova Friburgo, Rio Grande de Cima, Fazenda São João , 10.x.1988, A.B. Kury & R. Pinto-da- Rocha leg. ; 3 ♂ 1 ♀ ( MNRJ 02259 View Materials ), Nova Iguaçu, Tinguá, Faz. Adjacent to REBIO do Tinguá , 11.iii.2010, A. Chagas, A. Giupponi, A.B. Kury & C. Sampaio leg. ; 1 ♂ ( MNRJ 02050 View Materials ), Paulo de Frontin, Sítio do Ricardo Pepeto , xii.2005, E. Wienskoski leg. ; 3 ♂ 7 ♀ 3 juv ( MNRJ 07182 View Materials ), Santa Maria Madalena, PARES do Desengano, Morumbeca , 03-12.i.2011 B. Buzato, A. Giupponi, A.B. Kury & G. Miranda leg. ; 1 ♂ ( MNRJ 16377 View Materials ), Silva Jardim, Poço das Antas , Centro de Primatologia , pitfall, ix.2004, Ana Clara leg. ; 1 ♀ ( MNRJ 8476 View Materials ), Valença, Parque Natural Municipal do Açude da Concórdia , 31.viii.2012, G. Miranda leg. ; 1 ♂ ( MNRJ 04755 View Materials ), Arraial do Cabo, Ilha de Cabo Frio , 26.ii.2001, E. Wienskoski leg. ; 4 ♂ 2 ♀ ( MNRJ 16372 View Materials ), path to old lightouse, E. Wienskoski leg. ; 1 ♂ ( MNRJ 08779 View Materials ), Cachoeiras de Macacu:, Boca do Mato , iii.2009, Tangerina, N. leg. ; 1 ♂ ( MNRJ 09149 View Materials ), Guapiaçu , REGUA 24-27.vi.2012, A. Giupponi & J. Silva leg. ; 2 ♂ 5 ♀ 1 juv. ( MNRJ 11596 View Materials ), Reserva Ecológica de Guapiaçu , 20-21.xi.2001, A. B. Kury, A. Giupponi, & S. Brandão leg. ; 1 ♂ 2 ♀ ( MNRJ 01376 View Materials ), Jacarepaguá: Roger Arlé leg. ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀ ( MNRJ 42223 View Materials ), iv.1935, Herbert Berla leg. ; 1 ♀ ( MNRJ 42355 View Materials ), Carlos Couceiro leg. ; 1 ♀ ( MNRJ 58325 View Materials ), Roger Arlé leg. Minas Gerais State: 5 ♂ 5 ♀ ( MNRJ 07178 View Materials ), Juiz de Fora, APA do Krambeck , 02.ix.2010, A. Giupponi, A.B. Kury, C. Pires & C. Sampaio leg ..
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Paecilaema
Kury, Adriano B. & Medrano, Miguel 2018 |
Cosmetus
Mello-Leitao, C. F. de 1932: 85 |
Roewer, C. F. 1928: 597 |
Roewer, C. F. 1923: 373 |
Mello-Leitao, C. F. de 1923: 114 |
Roewer, C. F. 1923: 372 |
Roewer, C. F. 1912: 99 |
Canestrini, G. 1888: 106 |
Simon, E. 1879: 193 |
Gervais, P. 1844: 115 |
Lucas, P. H. 1840: 48 |
Koch, C. L. 1840: 107 |
Koch, C. L. 1839: 21 |
Koch, C. L. 1839: 21 |
Perty, J. A. M. 1833: 203 |