Cosmopelma dentatum Fischel, 1927
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4137.4.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C998CD33-D2CB-4F47-BF53-50ECD446B65C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6087781 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE87C9-FFA6-FFA6-FF18-0223FC3EB5A1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cosmopelma dentatum Fischel, 1927 |
status |
|
Cosmopelma dentatum Fischel, 1927
Cosmopelma dentata Fischel, 1927:69 ; Roewer, 1942:220; Raven, 1986:52. Cosmopelma dentatum: World Spider Catalog, 2016 .
Remarks. Cosmopelma dentatum was described by Fischel (1927) based on a male specimen from Venezuela. Raven (1986) suggested that this species, whose type is lost, should be excluded from the genus based on the absence of a clypeus and the different abdominal pattern.
Fischel (1927) stated that the described specimen had all characteristics found in Cosmopelma , except for the presence of teeth on the claws. However, other characters in the original description do not correspond to what we see in Cosmopelma , such as the uniform dark brown color, the labium being longer than wide and indented forward, and the recurved fovea. Furthermore, there was no mention of the distinctive spiky cuspules.
Thus, it is very likely that the lost type did not belong to Cosmopelma . The characters and the figures in Fischel (1927) suggest that the specimen could potentially belong to the cyrtaucheniid genus Fufius Simon, 1888 . Therefore, this species is hereby considered as nomen dubium in Fufius .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cosmopelma dentatum Fischel, 1927
Mori, Andre & Bertani, Rogerio 2016 |
Cosmopelma dentata
Raven 1986: 52 |
Roewer 1942: 220 |
Fischel 1927: 69 |