Deinodryinus, Perkins, 1907

Guglielmino, Adalgisa & Olmi, Massimo, 2015, Revision of the Afrotropical species of Deinodryinus Perkins, 1907 (Hymenoptera: Dryinidae), with description of a new species from Madagascar, African Invertebrates 56 (1), pp. 229-229 : 231-233

publication ID	https://doi.org/10.5733/afin.056.0116
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7914035
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE87AA-FFEC-FFC2-8878-FAAE6356FCA6
treatment provided by	Felipe (2023-05-08 22:50:56, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-09 04:08:49)
scientific name	Deinodryinus
status

Treatment

Key to the Afrotropical species of Deinodryinus Females (species with females unknown are absent)

1 Micropterous ( Figs 40, 41 View Figs 40, 41 )...................................................................................... 2

– Macropterous...........................................................................................................6

2 Posterior surface of propodeum transversely striate ...................... richardsi (Olmi)

– Posterior surface of propodeum reticulate rugose, not transversely striate.............3

3 Anterior surface of propodeum shiny, smooth, unsculptured ........... casalei (Olmi)

– Anterior surface of propodeum reticulate rugose or granulated .............................4

4 Anterior surface of propodeum granulated ....................................... capensis Olmi

– Anterior surface of propodeum reticulate rugose....................................................5

5 Mesosoma completely yellowtestaceous; enlarged claw with one peglike lamella ( Fig. 21 View Figs 19–24 )............................................................................................... paulyi (Olmi)

– Mesosoma mostly black or almost completely black; enlarged claw with two bristles ( Fig. 23 View Figs 19–24 ).......................................................................................... prinslooi (Olmi)

6 Posterior surface of pronotum with sharp lateral margins ( Figs 5, 6 View Figs 4–6 )..................... 7

– Posterior suface of pronotum with rounded lateral margins .................................10

7 Pronotum with strong constriction between prothorax and mesothorax ( Fig. 5 View Figs 4–6 ); face sculptured by three median longitudinal keels (frontal line and two lateral keels running from posterior ocelli to antennal toruli)............................ guineensis Olmi

– Pronotum without strong constriction between prothorax and mesothorax ( Fig. 9 View Figs 7–12 ); face with only one complete or incomplete frontal line, without lateral keels .......8

8 Head strongly punctate, unsculptured among punctae, with anterior third of face rugose ........................................................................................... orangeanus Olmi

– Head completely reticulate rugose, or at most with vertex not reticulate rugose...9

9 Notauli reaching approximately 0.65× length of scutum; head completely reticulate rugose ......................................................................................... insulanus (Benoit)

– Notauli reaching approximately 0.90× length of scutum; head with face completely reticulate rugose except for vertex which is punctate and unsculptured among punctae ................................................................................................ pulcher Olmi

10 Antennal segment 3 approximately twice as long as segment 2; segment 5 of protarsus bearing small lamellae, some of which longer than others ( Fig. 16 View Figs 13–18 ) ........................ ................................................................................................. madecassus (Benoit)

– Antennal segment 3 about three or more times as long as segment 2...................11

11 Segment 5 of protarsus bearing lamellae of approximately same length ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–3 ); species mostly black............................................................................. benoiti Olmi

– Segment 5 of protarsus bearing small lamellae, some of which longer than others ( Fig. 15 View Figs 13–18 ); species mostly testaceousreddish................. madagascariensis (Benoit) Males (species with males unknown are absent)

1 Propodeum with transverse keel between dorsal and posterior surface ( Figs 25 View Figs25–30 , 31 View Figs 31–36 ) .................................................................................................................................2

– Propodeum without transverse keel between dorsal and posterior surface.............6

2 Paramere much shorter than penis ( Fig. 19 View Figs 19–24 ) ............................ namorokensis Olmi

– Paramere about as long as penis ( Figs 18 View Figs 13–18 , 26 View Figs25–30 , 32 View Figs 31–36 , 38 View Figs 37, 38 )............................................ 3

3 Dorsal surface of propodeum much reduced; keel between dorsal and posterior surface of propodeum situated quite close to anterior margin of propodeum( Fig. 25 View Figs25–30 ); distal part of stigmal vein slightly longer than proximal part ............. pulcher Olmi

– Dorsal surface of propodeum distinct and large; keel between dorsal and posterior surface of propodeum situated far from anterior margin of propodeum ( Fig. 31 View Figs 31–36 ); distal part of stigmal vein much shorter than proximal part ...................................4

4 Posterior surface of propodeum without longitudinal keels...................................... ..................................................................................... sabaeus Olmi & Van Harten

– Posterior surface of propodeum with two complete longitudinal keels..................5

5 Head granulated and reticulate rugose .......................................... monticolus Olmi

– Head punctate, unsculptured among punctae........................ umtamvunensis Olmi

6 Paramere much shorter than penis ( Fig. 19 View Figs 19–24 ) ............................ namorokensis Olmi

– Paramere about as long as penis ( Figs 4 View Figs 4–6 , 8, 12 View Figs 7–12 , 17 View Figs 13–18 , 22 View Figs 19–24 , 28 View Figs25–30 , 33, 34 View Figs 31–36 , 37 View Figs 37, 38 ).................. 7

7 Paramere with inner proximal branch wrapping penis ( Figs 4 View Figs 4–6 , 22 View Figs 19–24 ); distal part of stigmal vein much shorter than proximal part.........................................................8

– Paramere with 1–2 inner distal branches wrapping penis or not ( Figs 8, 12 View Figs 7–12 , 17 View Figs 13–18 , 28 View Figs25–30 , 33, 34 View Figs 31–36 , 37 View Figs 37, 38 ); distal part of stigmal vein longer than, or as long as proximal part.....9

8 Proximal inner branch of paramere narrow ( Fig. 22 View Figs 19–24 ).......................... paulyi (Olmi)

– Proximal inner branch of paramere broad ( Fig. 4 View Figs 4–6 )........................ danielssoni Olmi

9 Paramere with small distal branch ( Figs 12–14 View Figs 7–12 View Figs 13–18 )................................. irreptus Olmi

– Paramere with 1–2 large distal branches ( Figs 8 View Figs 7–12 , 17 View Figs 13–18 , 28–30 View Figs25–30 , 33–37 View Figs 31–36 View Figs 37, 38 ) ..................10

10 Paramere with two distal branches wrapping penis ( Figs 8 View Figs 7–12 , 33 View Figs 31–36 ) and volsellae situated between these two branches.................................................................................. 11

– Paramere with one distal branch wrapping penis ( Figs 17 View Figs 13–18 , 28–30 View Figs25–30 , 34–37 View Figs 31–36 View Figs 37, 38 ) .........12

11 Posterior surface of propodeum dull, reticulate rugose; inner distal branch of paramere with distal apex small ( Fig. 8 View Figs 7–12 )........................................................ harinhalai Olmi

– Posterior surface of propodeum rugose, with central shiny, smooth, unsculptured area; inner distal branch of paramere with distal apex notably large ( Fig. 33 View Figs 31–36 )......... ................................................................................................. sofiensis Olmi , sp. n.

12 Distal branch of paramere wrapping penis hatchet blade shaped ( Fig. 17 View Figs 13–18 ).............. ................................................................................................. madecassus (Benoit)

– Distal branch of paramere wrapping penis not hatchet blade shaped ( Figs 28–30 View Figs25–30 , 34–37 View Figs 31–36 View Figs 37, 38 )...................................................................................................................13

13 Head shiny, quite finely punctate; inner side of paramere not sculptured by papillae ( Fig. 37 View Figs 37, 38 )................................................................................................. suavis Olmi

– Head strongly punctate, with punctae large, deep and similar to areolae; inner side of paramere broadly sculptured by papillae ( Figs 28–30 View Figs25–30 , 34 View Figs 31–36 )...............................14

14 Distal branch of paramere wrapping penis, curved, markedly long and slender ( Figs 28–30 View Figs25–30 ) ....................................................................................... rusticus Olmi

– Distal branch of paramere wrapping penis not curved, short and broad ( Figs 34–36 View Figs 31–36 ) ............................................................................................................. steineri Olmi

Figures

Figs 40, 41. Deinodryinus casalei (Olmi), holotype female:(40) dorsal view; (41) lateral view; (from Olmi, 1984). Length: 3.7 mm.

Figs 19–24. (19) Deinodryinus namorokensis Olmi, holotype – male genitalia; (20) D. orangeanus Olmi, holotype – chela; (21, 22) D. paulyi (Olmi): (21) holotype – chela, (22) genitalia of male from Niger, Tarna goulbin; (23) D.prinslooi (Olmi), holotype, chela; (24) D.pulcher Olmi,holotype, chela.Scale bar = (19) 0.16 mm; (20) 0.21 mm; (21) 0.14 mm; (22) 0.12 mm; (23, 24) 0.42 mm.

Figs 4–6. (4) Deinodryinus danielssoni Olmi – male genitalia from South Africa, Skoorsteenkop; (5, 6) D. guineensis Olmi, holotype – (5) dorsal and (6) lateral views of pronotum. Scale bar = (4) 0.12mm; (5, 6) 0.63 mm.

Figs 7–12. (7) Deinodryinus guineensis Olmi,holotype – chela; (8) D.harinhalai, holotype – male genitalia; (9–11) D. insulanus (Benoit): (9–10) female from Madagascar, Perinet – (9) dorsal and (10) lateral views of pronotum, (11) holotype – chela; (12) D. irreptus Olmi, holotype – male genitalia. Scale bar = (7) 0.13 mm; (8) 0.17 mm; (9, 10) 1.3 mm; (11) 0.21 mm; (12) 0.11 mm.

Figs 13–18. (13, 14) Deinodryinus irreptus Olmi, distal apex of paramere of Madagascan male from (13) 19°42.34'S 44°43.5'E, (14) 20°02.42'S 44°39.44'E; (15) D. madagascariensis (Benoit), holotype – chela; (16, 17) D. madecassus (Benoit): (16) holotype – chela, (17) allotype – male genitalia; (18) D. monticolus Olmi, holotype – male genitalia. Scale bar = (13) 0.10 mm; (14) 0.11 mm; (15) 0.23 mm; (16, 18) 0.17 mm; (17) 0.13 mm.

Figs 1–3. (1) Deinodryinus benoiti Olmi, holotype – chela; (2) D. capensis Olmi, holotype – chela; (3) D. casalei (Olmi), holotype – chela. Scale bar = (1) 0.28 mm; (2, 3) 0.14 mm.

Figs25–30.(25,26)DeinodryinuspulcherOlmi,paratypemale:(25)propodeumdorsalview,(26) malegenitalia; (27) D.richardsi (Olmi), holotype – chela; (28–30) D.rusticus Olmi:(28) holotype – male genitalia, (29,30) distal apexof paramereofMadagascan male – (29)18°28.24'S 47°57.36'Eand (30)24°39.13'S 43°59.48'E. Scale bar = (25) 0.41 mm; (26)0.15 mm; (27)0.25 mm; (28) 0.20mm; (29, 30) 0.12 mm.

Figs 31–36.(31, 32) Deinodryinussabaeus Olmi &Van Harten,paratype male:(31) propodeum dorsal view, (32) holotype – male genitalia; (33) D. sofiensis sp. n., holotype – male genitalia; (34–36) D. steineri Olmi: (34) holotype – male genitalia, (35, 36) paramere of Madagascan male – (35) 12°30.52'S 49°10.53'E and (36) 21°15.99'S 47°25.21'E. Scale bar = (31) 0.28 mm; (32, 33) 0.13 mm; (34) 0.21mm; (35) 0.24 mm; (36) 0.25 mm.

Figs 37, 38. (37) Deinodryinus suavis Olmi, holotype – male genitalia; (38) D. umtamvunensis Olmi, holotype – male genitalia. Scale bar = (37) 0.19 mm; (38) 0.11 mm.