Rubus, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.515.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8066940 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE3646-FF86-FFD4-FF43-F983FC71F80F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rubus |
status |
stat. nov. |
Subsection Afroidaei (Focke) A.Beek stat. nov.
Basionym:— Rubus ser. Afroidaei Focke (1911: 171 , 172) in Bibliotheca Botanica 17, Heft 72 (2).
Type (designated here): — Rubus kingaensis Engler (1902: 313) View in CoL .
Calyx divided (almost) to base.
Note: —The series of African Rubus described by Focke (1911) cover a wide range of species, without a clear identity. It is better to use the rank of series for natural, well defined groups of species, and the wider groups as subsections. The presentation of infrageneric taxa in this paper results from this consideration.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Rubus
Beek, Abraham Van De 2021 |
Rubus ser. Afroidaei
Focke, W. O. 1911: 171 |
Rubus kingaensis
Engler, A. 1902: ) |