Newportia (Tidops) Chamberlin, 1915
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4825.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F230F199-1C94-4E2E-9CE4-5F56212C015F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4455391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE092D-FFFF-D704-FF13-F8E52C12DDEA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Newportia (Tidops) Chamberlin, 1915 |
status |
|
(!) Newportia (Tidops) Chamberlin, 1915
Figs 22–25 View FIGURES 20–25
Synonyms. Kartops Archey, 1923 .
Type species. Tidops simus Chamberlin,1915 View in CoL (by monotypy).
Diagnosis. Anterior margin of forcipular coxosternite with two short, blunt projections ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20–25 ); forcipular tarsungula short, barely overlapping each other when adducted. LBS 7 without spiracles. Ultimate leg with tarsus 2 divided into 6–23 variably-distinct secondary articles, without claw-shaped pretarsus.
Number of species: 4.
Remarks. Treated as a genus in Edgecombe & Bonato (2011: 406), Chagas-Jr (2011: 63), Vahtera et al. (2013: 579) and Bonato et al. (2016). As a result of a molecular analysis Vahtera et al. (2013: 589) suggested this genus to be a subgenus of Newportia . Schileyko (2002) was the first to doubt the validity of the enigmatic genus Kartops Archey, 1923 when he wrote that (p. 5): “The same investigation allows also to regard the genus Kartops … to be a junior synonym of Tidops “. Edgecombe & Bonato (2011: 406) agreed with that, noting that Tidops possibly includes Kartops . The most recent morphological account on Tidops is that by Chagas-Jr (2011: 71), who synonymized Kartops with Tidops .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Newportiinae |
Genus |