Platylabus ornatus ( Provancher, 1875 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2022.2134061 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7397693 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD87D3-FFF7-FFB7-55B0-9651FDA86ACE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Platylabus ornatus ( Provancher, 1875 ) |
status |
|
Platylabus ornatus ( Provancher, 1875) View in CoL
( Figures 28 View Figure 28 , 29 View Figure 29 )
Phygadeuon ornatus Provancher, 1875: 181 , 183 (descr., key).
Platylabus ornatus Cresson 1877: 200 View in CoL (descr., key); Provancher 1879: 36 (descr., key); Provancher 1883: 305 (descr., key); Provancher 1886: 36 (key); Cresson 1887: 191 (cat.); Dalla Torre 1902: 786 (cat.); Bradley 1903: 283 (distr., key, fig.); Gahan and Rohwer 1918a: 168 (invalid lectotype designation); Brown 1941: 10; Townes 1944: 312 (cat.); Townes and Townes 1951: 281 (distr., cat.); Heinrich 1962b: 747 (descr., distr., neallotype designation, key); Heinrich 1971: 1019, 1975: 774 (distr.); Barron 1975: 523 (notes); Bradley 1978: 16 (distr., host); Carlson 1979: 545 (cat., distr.); Gillespie and Finlayson 1983: 22 (fig., host, key, larva descr.); Yu and Horstmann 1997: 679 (cat.); Yu et al. 2016 (cat.).
Original type series
Holotype ♀, by monotypy ( LEUC). Provancher (1875, p. 181) mentioned ‘Un seul specimen ♀ ’ (= only one female specimen) in the original description. Gahan and Rohwer (1918a, p. 168) designated a lectotype, but as Barron (1975, p. 523) acknowledged, there is no need for a lectotype as Provancher clearly mentioned only one specimen. Therefore, this specimen is here referred to as the holotype fixed by monotypy ( ICZN 1999, Article 73.1.2) and Gahan and Rohwer’s (1918a, p. 168) designation should be considered an invalid lectotype designation.
Type locality
Canada, Québec. No type locality is given on the holotype labels, but the species has been described in ‘ Les Ichneumonides de Québec’ ( Provancher 1875) .
Type specimens examined ( Figures 28 View Figure 28 , 29 View Figure 29 )
Holotype: ‘[Yellow label] 244 // [White label] Platylabus / ornatus /Prov. // [Red label] LECTOTYPE / Phygadeuon / ornatus / PROVANCHER/[Written vertically on right side] Comeau/1940 // [Red lable] HOLOTYPE / Phygadeuon / ornatus / Provancher 244/ Barron ‘71’ (images examined).
Updated distribution ( Figure 29 View Figure 29 )
CANADA: Alberta ( Heinrich 1962b; Bradley 1978), British Columbia ( Heinrich 1962b; Bradley 1978), Manitoba ( Bradley 1978); New Brunswick ( Heinrich 1962b; Bradley 1978), Newfoundland and Labrador ( Heinrich 1975; Bradley 1978), Nova Scotia ( Bradley 1978); Ontario ( Bradley 1978), Québec ( Provancher 1875; Bradley 1978), Saskatchewan ( Bradley 1978); UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: California ( Townes and Townes 1951), Maine ( Heinrich 1962b), New York ( Heinrich 1971), North Carolina ( Heinrich 1962b), Washington ( Townes and Townes 1951).
Host
Eupithecia intricata (Zetterstedt) ( Bradley 1978) , Macaria bicolorata Fabricius ( Bradley 1978) , Macaria granitata Guenée ( Brown 1941; Townes 1944), Macaria oweni ( Heinrich 1962b; Bradley 1978), Macaria pustularia ( Bradley 1978) , Macaria sexmaculata Swett ( Bradley 1978) , Macaria signaria dispuncta Walker ( Bradley 1978) , Macaria unipuctaria perplexa McDonnough ( Bradley 1978) ( Lepidoptera : Geometridae ).
Male
The first description of a male was provided by Heinrich (1962b, p. 747), who referred to the specimen as the neallotype.
Comments
Bradley (1978, p. 16, fig. 11 reported the species from ‘Newfoundland to British Columbia’, plotting the records on a map without pointing out the Canadian provinces. This is probably why subsequent authors ( Carlson 1979; Yu and Horstmann 1997; Yu et al. 2016) did not report the species occurring in Manitoba and Nova Scotia. Yu et al. (2016) also failed to report California and Washington, reported by Townes and Townes (1951, p. 281), as state records for the species. According to Heinrich (1962b, p. 748), these western populations are slightly less melanistic than the eastern ones and could also be interpreted as different subspecies.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Platylabus ornatus ( Provancher, 1875 )
Dal Pos, Davide, Heilman, Victoria & Welter-Schultes, Francisco 2022 |
Platylabus ornatus
Yu DSK & Horstmann K 1997: 679 |
Gillespie DR & Finlayson T 1983: 22 |
Carlson RW 1979: 545 |
Bradley GA 1978: 16 |
Heinrich G 1975: 774 |
Barron JR 1975: 523 |
Heinrich G 1971: 1019 |
Heinrich G 1962: 747 |
Townes HK & Townes M 1951: 281 |
Townes HK 1944: 312 |
Brown AWA 1941: 10 |
Gahan AB & Rohwer SA 1918: 168 |
Bradley JC 1903: 283 |
Dalla Torre KW 1902: 786 |
Cresson ET 1887: 191 |
Provancher L 1886: 36 |
Provancher L 1883: 305 |
Provancher L 1879: 36 |
Cresson ET 1877: 200 |
Phygadeuon ornatus
Provancher L 1875: 181 |