Atrovirensis owadai Gyulai, Ronkay
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4088.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:431D8F02-C8D3-4E97-8FAC-04558E5BA60C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6084425 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DC8796-C05A-FF9C-3C99-86D5FC30EF3D |
treatment provided by |
Donat |
scientific name |
Atrovirensis owadai Gyulai, Ronkay |
status |
|
Atrovirensis owadai Gyulai, Ronkay & Wu, 2013
( Figs 8 View FIGURES 1 – 15 , 28 View FIGURES 27 – 29 , 41, 42 View FIGURES 36 – 44 )
Atrovirensis owadai Gyulai, Ronkay & Wu, 2013, Fibigeriana supplement: 1: 127, Pl. 39:13–16; gen. fig. 7, 8. Type-locality: China, Prov. Guangdong, Nanling. Holotype: male, NSMT.
References. Kononenko 2001 ( Atrovirensis sinica , part, female).
Material examined. 1 female, Prov. Guangdong, Huizhou City, Mt. Nankunshan, 17.v.2003. M. Wang leg. Genit. prep. HHL-2913-2. Coll. SCAU, presently deposited in NEFU, Harbin. The specimen included to the typeseries of A. owadai as a paratype.
Diagnosis. Adult ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 15 ). Wingspan 36–38 mm. The species is externally similar to its sister-species, A. sinica and A. taiwani , but can be distinguish from them by broader wings with less pointed apex, more vivid greenish patterns and the absence of reddish-brown suffusion in subterminal area. Male genitalia ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 27 – 29 ). In the male genitalia, A. owadai differs from A. sinica by more massive uncus, larger, more triangular shape of cucullus, shorter and thicker harpe; vesica with larger and broader diverticula, medial cornutus larger and thinner than in A.
sinica . Female genitalia ( Fig. 41, 42 View FIGURES 36 – 44 ). The female of this species described by Kononenko (2001) as A. sinica (Gyulai et al. 2013) . It could be characterised by relatively small lyriform ovipositor, small, split-like antrum, very short ductus bursae covered with fine short setae and elongate corpus bursae.
Distribution. China (Prov. Guangdong).
Note. The paratypes specimens of A. owadai referred by Gyulai et al. (2013) as 1 male, 1 female, Prov. Guangdong, Mt. Nankunshan, 17.v.2003, leg. M. Wang; “1 male, from the same site, 18.v.2003, leg. M. Wang; 1 specimen, Autonomous Region Guangxi, Mt. Cenwanglaoshan, v.2002, leg. M. Wang; 1 specimen, Prov. Guangdong, Mt. Nanling, 22.vi.2003, leg. M. Wang (coll. SCAU) have been examined by authors only by photograph, without dissection. In fact those specimens belong to A. furcatus (genit. preps HHL-2919-2, HHL- 2911-2, HHL-2922-1, paratypes) and to A. sp. cf. furcatus (genit. preps HHL-2918-1, HHL-2909-2) and included to the type series of A. furcatus and examined material on A. sp. cf. furcatus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |