Phaius mishmensis (Lindl. & Paxton) Rchb.
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.481.1.1 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887B7-8190-FF3C-FF04-FDC2FEDEFBCB |
|
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
|
scientific name |
Phaius mishmensis (Lindl. & Paxton) Rchb. |
| status |
|
Phaius mishmensis (Lindl. & Paxton) Rchb. View in CoL f., Bonplandia 5: 43, 1857
Basionym: Limatodis mishmensis Lindl. & Paxton View in CoL , Paxton’s Fl. Gard. 3: 36, 1852.
Heterotypic synonym: Phaius roseus Rolfe, Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1893: 6, 1893 View in CoL .
Specimens examined:— KACHIN. Putao District : fide Aung et al. (2020: 95) . SHAN. Taunggyi District: 1330 m, 11 Jan 2016, Saw Lwin SL 217 ( RAF). LOWER MYANMAR. Boxall s.n. ( K). Also reported from Sagaing Region, Chin State and Mandalay Region by Kress et al. (2003: 86), but we have not seen material from these areas.
Distribution:— The eastern Himalayas, northeastern India, Myanmar, Thailand, Indochina, southwestern and southern China, Taiwan, Japan and the Philippines.
Note:— The type of the synonym Phaius roseus from ‘ West Central Africa’ probably came from northeastern India , not Myanmar.
| RAF |
Forest Research Institute |
| K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Phaius mishmensis (Lindl. & Paxton) Rchb.
| Ormerod, Paul, Kurzweil, Hubert & Watthana, Santi 2021 |
Phaius roseus
| Rolfe, Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew 1893 |