Foveacorpus parvus, Bartel & Dunlop & Giribet, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5296.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:59AD1B4F-15B2-4DC0-A57E-2F6B57539D1A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7987764 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BC6852F1-9D85-46BF-9B15-EFF0F7230F9A |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:BC6852F1-9D85-46BF-9B15-EFF0F7230F9A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Foveacorpus parvus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Species Foveacorpus parvus View in CoL sp. nov.
Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BC6852F1-9D85-46BF-9B15-EFF0F7230F9A
Holotype. Specimen GPIH05130 View Materials , ex coll. Patrick Müller, BUB3634.
Type-locality. Myanmar, Hukawng Valley; Burmese amber, Upper Cretaceous (Lower Cenomanian)
Etymology. The Latin adjective “parvus, -a, -um” (= small) refers to the small size of this species.
Diagnosis. Distinct from Foveacorpus cretaceus sp. nov. by its more pear-shaped body, smaller body size (less than 1mm), smaller tegumental pits and more bulbous ozophores.
Description. Body pear-shaped, subtriangular at anterior end and completely covered with small pits (diameter 0.011*); total L 0.82, maximum prosomal W behind ozophores 0.39, maximum opisthosomal W 0.48. Rounded ozophores probably in type 1 position. Distal part of left ozophore appearing bulbous ( Fig. 13A, C View FIGURE 13 ). L of ozophores 0.09, W at base 0.10, distance between base of ozophores 0.26. Eyes equivocal. Chelicerae moderately long, finely granular on proximal segment; dentition equivocal; basal segment L 0.20, median segment L?, distal segment L?. Pedipalps small and thin; pedipalp length: tr?, fe 0.11, pa 0.03, ti 0.05, ta?. Legs relatively short, robust and granular; tarsus I not subdivided, bearing a single smooth claw and numerous setae; leg length: I tr 0.10, fe 0.19, pa 0.07*, ti 0.09, mt 0.10, ta 0.12, total 0.67; II tr?, fe 0.18, pa 0.06, ti?, mt?, ta?; III tr?, fe?, pa 0.10, ti 0.10, mt?, ta?; IV tr?, fe 0.16, pa 0.10, ti 0.10, mt 0.07, ta?. Ventral side of opisthosoma also covered with numerous small pits. Possible spiracles indicated by a few small denticles situated posterior to coxa IV. Anal plate rounded, with few small pits and with a corona analis, W 0.12, L 0.07 ( Fig. 13B, D View FIGURE 13 ).
Remarks. The developmental stage of the holotype of Foveacorpus parvus sp. nov. (GPIH05130; Fig. 13A– D View FIGURE 13 ) is difficult to assess because important characters like the gonostome or tarsus IV are obscured. Due to its strong sclerotization and dark colouration the fossil presumably is an adult. Nevertheless, this is another interesting specimen whose body is completely covered with small pits similar to those observed in the holotype of Foveacorpus cretaceus sp. nov. (GPIH05129; see above). Many of these pits seem to be open and originally preserved on the ventral side of the body ( Fig. 13B View FIGURE 13 ). Therefore we again exclude the possibility of an artefact. Additionally, both congeneric specimens possess a corona analis and granular legs ( Fig. 13B, D View FIGURE 13 cf. Fig. 11D View FIGURE 11 ). A modified right leg III as in specimen GPIH05129 cannot be observed in this fossil. Furthermore, GPIH05130 is smaller, features more bulbous ozophores and a more subtriangular anterior margin of the dorsal scutum. Based on these differences GPIH05130 is associated with a different new species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Cyphophthalmi |
Family |
|
Genus |