Foveacorpus cretaceus, Bartel & Dunlop & Giribet, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5296.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:59AD1B4F-15B2-4DC0-A57E-2F6B57539D1A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7984093 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76311F9-33F8-4734-8C4F-30F02D17D35D |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:D76311F9-33F8-4734-8C4F-30F02D17D35D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Foveacorpus cretaceus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Species Foveacorpus cretaceus View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs. 11–12 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D76311F9-33F8-4734-8C4F-30F02D17D35D
Holotype. Specimen GPIH05129 View Materials , ex coll. Patrick Müller, BUB3645.
Type-locality. Myanmar, Hukawng Valley; Burmese amber, Upper Cretaceous (Lower Cenomanian).
Etymology. The specific epithet “cretaceus” (a Latin adjective) refers to the Cretaceous Period.
Diagnosis. Distinct from Foveacorpus parvus sp. nov. in more oval body, larger body size (more than 1 mm), larger pits in the tegument and less bulbous ozophores.
Description. Body oval, somewhat subtriangular in profile at anterior end and completely covered with small pits (their diameter 0.016*); total L 1.03, maximum prosomal W behind ozophores 0.39, maximum opisthosomal W 0.45. Dorsal tergites without visible sutures ( Fig. 11A, C View FIGURE 11 ). Rounded ozophores covered with small pits and probably in type 1 position. L of ozophores 0.07, W at base 0.09, distance between bases of ozophores 0.24. Eyes equivocal. Chelicerae moderately long, protruding and finely granular; fingers thin and relatively long, somewhat overlapped by thicker setae originating from coxae I ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ); dentition equivocal; basal segment L 0.19, median segment L 0.25, distal segment L 0.09. Pedipalps small and granular on femur; tarsus covered with sensory setae and bearing a small claw on its tip; pedipalp length: tr?, fe?, pa 0.07, ti 0.09, ta 0.08*. Legs relatively short, robust and granular; legs I and II are notably forward-directed and leg IV relatively far away from leg III; left leg III (in ventral view) appearing modified, more robust and with scopula on tarsus as compared to right leg III; leg tarsi not subdivided, each bearing a single smooth claw and numerous setae (sensory setae and thick setae); tarsus IV without adenostyle; leg lengths: I, tr 0.07, fe 0.18, pa 0.10, ti 0.15, mt 0.08, ta 0.08, total 0.66; II tr 0.07, fe 0.12, pa 0.09, ti 0.13, mt 0.13, ta 0.13, total 0.67; III tr 0.08, fe 0.12, pa 0.05, ti 0.09, mt 0.10, ta 0.08, total 0.52; IV tr 0.07, fe 0.13*, pa 0.09, ti 0.13, mt 0.07, ta 0.07, total 0.56. Ventral side of opisthosoma also covered with numerous small pits. Gonostome open and somewhat circular, surrounded with few thick setae, W 0.07, L 0.07. Possible spiracles indicated by a few circularly arranged denticles situated posterior to coxae IV. Anal plate rounded, with few small pits and surrounded by a corona analis, W 0.10, L 0.08 ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Cyphophthalmi |
Family |
|
Genus |