Philonthus longicornis Stephens, 1832
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.186351 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6216662 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D787C9-FFAA-FF9B-FF1B-CE3FCE5CE0A9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Philonthus longicornis Stephens, 1832 |
status |
|
Philonthus longicornis Stephens, 1832 View in CoL
(Figs. 331–338 in Smetana 1995)
Philonthus longicornis Stephens, 1832: 237 View in CoL . For complete references see Herman (2001).
Philonthus perplexus Fairmaire & Germain, 1861: 431 View in CoL ; Fauvel, 1866a: 345 (= 1866b: 96) (misidentified as varians according to Coiffait & Sáiz, 1968: 360; characters); Fauvel, 1869: 489 (syn. of longicornis View in CoL ); Fauvel, 1874a: 255 (= 1874b: 481) (syn. of longicornis View in CoL ); Ganglbauer, 1895: 454 (syn. of longicornis View in CoL ); Bernhauer & Schubert, 1914: 345 (cat.; syn. of longicornis View in CoL ); Blackwelder, 1943: 410 (syn. of longicornis View in CoL ); Smetana, 1958: 189 (syn. of longicornis View in CoL ); Coiffait & Sáiz, 1968: 360 ( Spatulonthus ; valid species; characters); Sáiz, 1971: 348 ( Spatulonthus ; notes); Desender & Baert, 1996: 36 ( Spatulonthus ; list); Herman, 2001: 2911 (complete references). Chani-Posse, 2004: 231 (list).
Type material. Lectotype of Philonthus perplexus (here designated), 3, with labels: “ Chili ” (green), “ Spatulonthus perplexus Fairmaire et Germain ” (unknown handwriting, white), “ Lectotype Philonthus perplexus Fairmaire et Germain, 1861 / Des. Chani-Posse de Maus 2008” ( MNHN). Paralectotypes: 3, Ƥ, with labels: “ Chili ” (green), “ Paralectotype Philonthus perplexus Fairmaire et Germain, 1861 / Des. Chani- Posse de Maus 2008” ( MNHN). Males were dissected; in each case the aedeagus was glued on a different plate and attached to the beetle.
Additional material. CHILE: 3, Ƥ, Maipo, 12.XI.1972, Col. G. Arriagada ( MNHN). Diagnosis. See Smetana (1995: 243).
Notes. Stephens (1832: 237) described P. longicornis based on specimens from London. I have not seen the original material but I have no doubt that P. p e r p l e x u s is the species that Stephens described, as interpreted later by other authors (e.g. Sharp 1885; Blackwelder 1943; Smetana 1958, 1995).
Comments. Philonthus perplexus was considered to be a synonym of P. longicornis since Fauvel (1869) until Coiffait and Saiz (1968) treated it as a valid species. The type material of P. perplexus and the examined material of P. longicornis are similar in all external characters and identical in the shape of aedeagus. Therefore, these names are considered to be synonyms (confirmed synonymy).
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Philonthus longicornis Stephens, 1832
Maus, Mariana Chani-Posse De 2009 |
Philonthus perplexus
Herman 2001: 2911 |
Desender 1996: 36 |
Saiz 1971: 348 |
Coiffait 1968: 360 |
Coiffait 1968: 360 |
Smetana 1958: 189 |
Blackwelder 1943: 410 |
Bernhauer 1914: 345 |
Ganglbauer 1895: 454 |
Fauvel 1874: 255 |
Fauvel 1869: 489 |
Fauvel 1866: 345 |
Fairmaire 1861: 431 |
Philonthus longicornis
Stephens 1832: 237 |