Dupliciporia Reimer, 1985
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.180937 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6230589 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D587E3-EF61-7A27-FF34-BB2BFC6D98D1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dupliciporia Reimer, 1985 |
status |
|
Genus Dupliciporia Reimer, 1985 View in CoL
Synonyms: Parasteganoderma Machida & Araki, 1990 ; Liliaoralis Korotaeva, 1994 . Type-species: Dupliciporia haeckeli Reimer, 1985 .
Diagnosis: Body fusiform, widest in hindbody or elongate narrow. Tegument spinous. Oral sucker infundibuliform, with 4-8 anteriorly-directed lobes. Small pore may occur on body-surface dorsal to oral sucker, opens into gap dorsal to dorsal lobe of oral sucker. Ventral sucker transversely elongate, divided longitudinally by internal muscular ridge, in anterior half or middle of body. Prepharynx short, absent or long. Pharynx subglobular. Oesophagus long. Intestinal bifurcation in posterior forebody. Caeca reach testes. Testes oval, oblique, symmetrical or tandem in anterior or mid-hindbody. Cirrus-sac claviform, large, transverse, often curved. Internal seminal vesicle broadly tubular, undulating. Pars prostatica vesicular. Ejaculatory duct long or short, straight. Genital pore sinistro-lateral, just postbifurcal or bifurcal. Ovary oval, pretesticular, close to ventral sucker. Uterus fills much of hind-body, mainly post-testicular. Eggs elliptical; shell usually with two raised bands. Metraterm ensheathed by gland-cells. Vitellarium two small lateral fields of 9-10 follicles, pretesticular, in hindbody. Excretory vesicle not reaching testes; pore terminal. In marine teleosts; Indo-West Pacific region.
Remarks. Dupliciporia Reimer, 1985 was erected for D. haeckeli Reimer, 1985 from the Japanese bigeye Pristigenys niphonia (Cuvier, 1829) (as Pseudopriacanthus niphonicus [Cuvier, 1829]) ( Priacanthidae ) from the Indian Ocean off Mozambique ( Reimer 1985). Reimer described a separate female pore near the midline on the dorsal surface. Bray (1987) examined the type- and only specimen and considered this feature to be an anomaly, an artefact or a misinterpretation. Thanks to the kindness of Professor Reimer, we have re-examined this specimen and consider that the female system is of the normal configuration. In addition, we have detected a longitudinal muscular ridge or septum in the ventral sucker, rather than the transverse one described. A hint of this longitudinal septum can be seen in Figure 1 View FIGURES 1 – 5 of Reimer (1985). Bray (1987) considered this species a synonym of Neosteganoderma infundibulum ( Kamegai, 1973) from the glasseye Heteropriacanthus cruentatus (Lacepède, 1801) (as Priacanthus boops [Forster, 1801]) ( Priacanthidae ) ( Kamegai 1973), having examined the heavily flattened specimens of the latter species. Drs Araki and Machida (pers. comm.) have kindly re-examined the type specimens of Proctophantastes infundibulum Kamegai, 1973 (as it should now be known – see Brooks & McLennan 1993; Bray in press; Mouahid et al. 2008) and could detect neither a vertical nor a horizontal division of the ventral sucker. In neither D. haeckeli nor P. infundibulum could any ornamentation of the eggs be seen. The oral sucker in D. haeckeli is somewhat contracted, but is infundibuliform with withdrawn lobes. We think that Dupliciporia is, therefore, the oldest available name for the lepidophylline genus characterised by a longitudinally divided ventral sucker and an infundibuliform, lobed oral sucker, predating Parasteganoderma Machida & Araki, 1990 .
Parasteganoderma View in CoL was erected for the type-species P. cephaloporum Machida & Araki, 1990 View in CoL from the deepbody boarfish Antigonia capros Lowe, 1843 (Caproidae) View in CoL from deep-waters off the Pacific coast of southern Japan ( Machida & Araki 1990). The genus was characterised particularly by the funnel-shaped oral sucker with seven lobes, the muscular ridge running longitudinally down the centre of the ventral sucker and the two bands of egg-shell material around the egg. This species now becomes Dupliciporia cephaloporum ( Machida & Araki, 1990) View in CoL n. comb.
Korotaeva (1994) erected the genus Liliaoralis Korotaeva, 1994 View in CoL for L. cataluphi Korotaeva, 1994 View in CoL from two priacanthid fishes: the red bigeye Priacanthus macracanthus Cuvier, 1829 View in CoL and the purple-spotted bigeye P. tayenus Richardson, 1846 View in CoL from the South China Sea off Vietnam. It has an infundibulum View in CoL oral sucker with eight lobes and bands of egg-shell around the egg. There is no evidence in the illustration or text of a division in the ventral sucker. Nevertheless, we judge the worm similar enough to Dupliciporia View in CoL and Parasteganoderma View in CoL for them to be considered congeners forming the new combination Dupliciporia cataluphi ( Korotaeva, 1994) View in CoL n. comb.
El-Labadi et al. (2006) reported Parasteganoderma sp. from Pristigenys niphonia from the Gulf of Aqaba, finding it in all three specimens sampled. One specimen was donated to the Natural History Museum, London (BMNH 2005.4.13.40) and is illustrated here ( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 ). It has all the main characteristics of the genus, and may represent a new species (see below). Dupliciporia haeckeli was described from the same host species.
Machida et al. (2006) described Neosteganoderma physiculi Machida, Kamegai & Kuramochi, 2006 from the Japanese codling Physiculus japonicus Hilgendorf, 1879 (syn. P. maximowiczi Herzenstein, 1896 ) ( Gadiformes : Moridae ) from deep-water of the Sagami Sea, Japan. It has an infundibuliform oral sucker, with 3 lobes and an egg-shell with 2 bands. In these characteristics it is similar to Dupliciporia , but the ventral sucker is not described as divided and the caeca form separate ani at the posterior extremity of the body. These characters also differentiate this species from Neosteganoderma Byrd, 1964 (see Bray 1987), which is now considered a junior synonym of Proctophantastes Odhner, 1911 (see Brooks & McLennan 1993; Bray in press.; Mouahid et al. 2008). Examination of specimens of this species is necessary to assess its generic status in consideration of the definition of Dupliciporia presented in this paper.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Dupliciporia Reimer, 1985
Bray, Rodney A. & Justine, Jean-Lou 2008 |
Liliaoralis
Korotaeva 1994 |
L. cataluphi
Korotaeva 1994 |
Dupliciporia cataluphi (
Korotaeva 1994 |
P. cephaloporum
Machida & Araki 1990 |
Dupliciporia cephaloporum (
Machida & Araki 1990 |
P. tayenus
Richardson 1846 |
Antigonia capros
Lowe 1843 |
Priacanthus macracanthus
Cuvier 1829 |