Marengo, Wanless, 1978
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00123.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D487AA-FF8E-661E-F6C1-2CBDFA49FC0C |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Marengo |
status |
|
MARENGO View in CoL View at ENA G. & E. PECKHAM, 1892
Marengo View in CoL G. & E. Peckham, 1892: 66. Simon, 1900: 400–401. Simon, 1901: 488, 502. Sherriffs, 1931: 538– 539. Wanless, 1978: 231–296. Zabka, 1999.
Type species: Marengo crassipes Peckham & Peckham, 1892 , by original description. Single adult female specimen in MCZ, not examined.
Remarks: Peckham & Peckham (1892) established Marengo to accommodate a single species, Marengo crassipes , from Sri Lanka ( Ceylon). They diagnosed the genus based on nongenital morphology and the colour of a single female specimen. The appearance of the specimen led them to denote the genus as ‘antlike’. According to the original description, the genus can be diagnosed by the flat prosoma, eye position and the enlarged femur I and tibia I. However, none of these characters are synapomorphic for Marengo . Simon (1900, 1901) redefined Marengo and described four more species. Lessert (1925) added a further species, M. kibonotensis . Marengo was one of the few salticid genera to be revised and redefined by Wanless (1978). He revised the genus to include seven species, three of them new. Philates was synonymized with Marengo , M. nitida with M. crassipes , and M. kibonotensis with M. coriacea . The genus was once more redefined and the scope broadened by Zabka (1999), based on five newly described species from Papua New Guinea. Wanless (1978) and Zabka (1999) progressively broadened the original definition of the genus to make placement of newly described species possible. As a result, prior to the present study Marengo was on its way to becoming something of a polyphyletic wastebasket.
Monophyly and phylogenetic placement: The monophyly of Marengo is supported by the presence of white patches on lateral sides of the opisthosoma (23-1) and marked sexual dimorphism (41-1). However, of the five species currently placed in Marengo , only M. crassipes and M. deelemanae are known from both sexes. The monophyly of M. crassipes is supported by the presence of a concave ec (3-0) and presence of lts with a surface ribbed with prominent spines (34-1). M. crassipes , M. inornata and M. striatipes all possess epigynes that look very different from each other. Additionally, M. striatipes does not have an enlarged femur 1. Thus, the monophyly of Marengo remains to be tested.
Diagnosis: Distinguished from Ballus , Baviola , Colaxes , Cynapes and Sadies by the presence of lts (33; Figs 61A View Figure 61 , 63E, F View Figure 63 , 64C, D View Figure 64 , 68E, G View Figure 68 ). Distinguished from all other Ballinae , except for Philates chelifer , by the absence of cag (16; Figs 62A–D View Figure 62 , 66C, D View Figure 66 , 67C View Figure 67 , 68C, D View Figure 68 ) and from P. chelifer by the presence of an enlarged femur I (30; Figs 61A View Figure 61 , 65A, D View Figure 65 , 68A, G View Figure 68 ).
Description: See the description of the type species below and Wanless (1978).
Composition: Five species: M. crassipes , M. deelemanae sp. nov., M. inornata , M. nitida and M. striatipes .
Distribution: India: Kerala. Sri Lanka: Colombo, Kandy, Talawakele, Knuckles Range, Galle. Thailand: Pran Buri.
MARENGO CRASSIPES G. & E. PECKHAM, 1892
( FIGS 60A- C View Figure 60 , 61A, B View Figure 61 , 62A- D View Figure 62 , 63A- F View Figure 63 , 64A- D View Figure 64 , 65D- F View Figure 65 )
Marengo crassipes Peckham & Peckham (1892) View in CoL : 66, pl. v, fig. 4a–c, 1♀ lectotype from Sri Lanka, in MCZ, not examined.
M. crassipes Simon, 1901: 492 View in CoL , fig. 578. 1♀ from Sri Lanka ( MNHN 15223 About MNHN ), Central Province, Kandy , examined.
M. crassipes Wanless, 1978: 264–266 View in CoL , figs 3a–f, 4a; pls 1e, f, 2a–c, e.
Diagnosis: The female may be distinguished from those of all other known Marengo spp. by the presence of two pairs of white spots on the lateral sides of the opisthosoma ( Fig. 61A View Figure 61 ; females of M. nitida are unknown). The male is separated from that of M. nitida by the thin, tapering and relatively longer rta ( Figs 60C View Figure 60 , 63B View Figure 63 , 65F View Figure 65 ) and from that of M. deelemanae by the surface of lts, which is ribbed with numerous prominent spines. Males of M. inornata and M. striatipes are unknown.
Male: Sri Lanka, Kandy (MNHN 20405), total length 3.3; prosoma length 1.7, width 1.2. Leg I: femur 0.8, patella 0.3, tibia 0.9, metatarsus 0.6, tarsus 0.2. Markings as in Figures 60A View Figure 60 , 65D View Figure 65 . Prosoma dark reddishbrown to black-yellow, sides darker, with dark patches in front just behind ame and white patches just below the ple, venter uniformly yellow. Opisthosoma longer than wide, light brown to dark brown, dorsally with inconspicuous dark spots, laterally with a conspicuous oval spot, venter uniformly light yellow. Legs I–IV laterally with dark markings. Eyes in three rows, first recurved, second and third straight and surrounded
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Marengo
Benjamin, Suresh P. 2004 |
M. crassipes
Wanless FR 1978: 266 |
M. crassipes
Simon E 1901: 492 |
Marengo
Wanless FR 1978: 231 |
Sherriffs WR 1931: 538 |
Simon E 1901: 488 |
Simon E 1900: 400 |
Peckham GW & Peckham EG 1892: 66 |
Marengo crassipes
Peckham GW & Peckham EG 1892: 66 |