Hybomys Thomas, 1910
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7353098 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7283972 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087AE-FFA9-FFE4-FF12-0AD5FD03FBE4 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Hybomys Thomas, 1910 |
status |
|
Hybomys Thomas, 1910 View in CoL . Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, 5:85.
TYPE SPECIES: Mus univittatus Peters, 1876 .
SYNONYMS: Typomys .
COMMENTS: Carleton and Robbins (1985) provided a general review of morphometric traits, qualitative features, chromosomal data, geographic distributions, taxonomic assessments, and ecological and zoogeographical discussions of several species, with a focus on West African forms. The species have traditionally been arranged into two groups and reflected taxonomically as either subgenera ( Hybomys and Typomys ) or genera (see Rosevear's, 1969, excellent exposition). Results of biometric analyses led Van der Straeten (1984) to argue strongly for recognizing two genera. Carleton and Robbins (1985:983) corroborated that dichotomy with qualitative features and chromosomal data, but noted that whether “ Typomys and Hybomys merit generic segregation must await an evaluation of character variation among Hybomys and its near relatives."
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.