Zannicranaus monoclonius, Kury, Adriano B., 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.281089 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5697372 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE87D3-7D7A-FFEE-FF1D-F8F4FED6FEAF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Zannicranaus monoclonius |
status |
sp. nov. |
Zannicranaus monoclonius View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figures 1–20 View FIGURES 1 – 3 View FIGURES 4 – 6 View FIGURES 7 – 10 View FIGURES 11 – 13 View FIGURES 14 – 20 )
Etymology. Species name is a Greek noun in apposition, meaning “one horn”.
Type data. 3 holotype, 1 Ƥ paratype ( QCAZ AK 232) Ecuador, Chimborazo, Sibambe, small patch of forest along valley, (02.22059° S, 078.89622° W), alt: 2423 m; 29.iii.2011 A Chagas, A Giupponi & A Kury leg.; 1 3 1 Ƥ paratypes ( MZSP 42004), same data; 2 3 14 Ƥ paratypes ( MNRJ 19322), same data. Specimens were collected at night, near a small patch of woods, wandering on gullies near a brook.
Diagnosis. Scutal area I with pair of acuminate tubercles ( Figs. 1–4 View FIGURES 1 – 3 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Scutal area II invading area I ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Spines of area III strong and divergent, almost erect, only slightly bent backwards ( Figs. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 , 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Femur of pedipalpus with ventral row of 6 weak tubercles ( Figs. 9–11 View FIGURES 7 – 10 View FIGURES 11 – 13 ). Femora I–II of male with row of small spines. Femur IV of male with 4 sub-basal ventro-prolateral spines and 1 sub-distal ventro-retrolateral spine ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Tibia IV of male unarmed. No color dimorphism, female ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ) same color as male, which is motley and colorful in shades of red, yellow and green ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Stylus with 2 stylar caps, dorsal horseshoe-shaped ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ), ventral long foliaceous ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ). Male tarsal counts 7(3)/14-16(3)/9/9. Female tarsal counts 6(3)/13(3)/8/9
Description: male holotype QCAZ AK 232 (some illustrations are of male paratype MNRJ 19322, as indicated). Measurements of body (female paratype QCAZ AK 232 in parentheses): CL = 2.9 (2.3), CW = 4.1 (3.3), AL = 3.1 (3.3), AW = 5.8 (5.5).
Dorsum ( Figs. 1–4 View FIGURES 1 – 3 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Dorsal scutum roughly guitar-shaped without long coda (parallel-side terminal area) ( Figs. 1, 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Growing higher in lateral view at eye mound and area III ( Fig 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Carapace wide, roughly rectangular with anterior sides obliquely truncated, carapacal area well-marked, U-shaped with pointed base ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Abdominal scutum steadily growing wider, widest at 2/3 towards end, with sides strongly rounded in dorsal view ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Mesotergum well delimited, following outline of abdominal scutum, divided into 3 areas sparsely covered with granules situated within lighter islands ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Frontal hump well-defined, armed with very high single spine bent frontwards ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Eye mound wide, without median depression, armed with a paramedian pair of acuminate tubercles ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Area I divided into left and right halves, each with posterior border highly convex, armed with a pair of paramedian acuminate small spines and a few granules concentrated along the mid and posterior margins ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Area II unarmed, penetrating deeply into area I and dividing it into 2 halves, posterior border sinuous ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Area III with a pair of paramedian acute high spines ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ), leaned backwards ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ), and with outline clearly distorted posteriorly by the base of these spines ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Lateral margins unarmed. Posterior border of scutum smooth and unarmed, strongly convex in the middle ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Free tergites I–III armed each with pair of paramedian tubercles, those of tergite III largest.
Venter ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Coxae I–III transverse parallel, subequal in size. Coxa IV much more robust than any of the others, clearly slanted; ventro-distally with pair of acuminate tubercles. Stigmatic area Y-shaped, with large unobstructed elliptical stigmata.
Chelicerae ( Figs. 2–4 View FIGURES 1 – 3 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Basichelicerite strongly developed, wide, smooth, slightly surpassing in situ pedipalpal trochanter ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Bulla well-defined, armed with dorso-median posterior erect spine ( Figs. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 , 4 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Hand only a little swollen, and without remarkable armature.
Pedipalpus ( Figs. 7–13 View FIGURES 7 – 10 View FIGURES 11 – 13 ). Trochanter with 2 short ventral and 1 large dorsal spines. Femur with 1 ectal row of 8 spines, growing distally, distal one much larger than the others; 1 mesal row of 3 spines, distal one much larger than the others; 1 dorsal row of 6 spines, the 3 most basal ones much larger and 1 ventral row of 6 short tubercles. Patella and tibia dorsally with scattered short tubercles. Tibia ventro-ectal with 2, ventro-mesal with 5 spines. Tarsus ventro-ectal with 3, ventro-mesal with 2 spines. Article measurements: Tr = 1.0, Fe = 3.8, Pa = 1.4, Ti = 2.3, Ta = 2.1, claw = 1.8.
Legs. All leg articles unarmed except femora I, II, IV. Femur I with strong prodorsal sub-basal spine and ventral row of 4 spines, the 2 distalmost much larger. Femur II with strong prodorsal sub-basal spine and ventral row of 3 small spines. Femur IV with 2 sub-basal dorsal spines, 5 small prolateral spines on basal half, 3 small ventral spines on basal half, 1 strong retrolateral subdistal spine. Tibia IV entirely unarmed. Calcaneus I twice as long as astragalus and thickened. All metatarsi with very faint rings. Tarsal counts 7(3)-7(3)/14(3)-16(3)/9-9/9-9. Measurements of legs in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .
Color (in alcohol). Legs I–IV and anal opercles uniformly Dark Red (16). Tr, Pp and Ch Strong Orange (50), richly mottled in lighter shades. Carapace anteriorly, anterior laterals of abdominal scutum and coxae of pedipalp and I–III ventrally all with numerous Strong Orange Yellow (68) rounded islands over Deep Red (13) background. Abdominal scutum, coxa IV, stigmatic area and free sternites all with Strong Orange Yellow (68) rounded islands over Moderate Olive (107) background. The olive shade of abdomen penetrates a little medially in the posterior part of carapace, behind the eye mound. Paired spines of frontal hump, eye mound, areas I and III and free tergite III bicolor, basal half Vivid Orange (48) and distal half Brilliant Orange (49), both colors sharply contrasting with olive background.
Male genitalia ( Figs. 14–20 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ). Truncus changing direction abruptly at distal part ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ). Ventral plate of penis strongly leaned against truncus ( Figs. 14 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ), with wide and shallow V-cleft ( Figs. 15–16 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ), guitar-shaped ( Figs. 15–16 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ), and with two lateral patches of scale-setae on ventral surface ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ). Glans sac very long, fanfold, with small conical dorsal process ( Figs. 14, 16 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ). Stylus thick, straight, growing thinner distally ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ). Stylus head complex, with 2 stylar caps (flat pieces, with distal villosities, and applied to each other), dorsal stylar cap horseshoe-shaped ( Figs. 19–20 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ) and ventral stylar cap elongate tapering foliaceous ( Figs. 17–18, 20 View FIGURES 14 – 20 ).
Female allotype ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4 – 6 ). Very similar to male in most respects, including color pattern. Differences are: paired tubercles of free tergites I–III stronger, metatarsus I not thickened, femora III and coxa IV ventrally unarmed, basichelicerite small, cheliceral hand not swollen, femur IV with weaker armature. Tarsal counts 6(3)- 6(3)/13(3)-13(3)/8-8/9-9. Measurements of body: CL = 2.3, CW = 3.3, AL = 3.3, AW = 5.5. Measurements of legs in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Laniatores |
Family |
|
Genus |