Dasydorylas, Skevington, 2001

Ramos-Pastrana, Yardany, Marques, Dayse Willkenia A. & Rafael, José Albertino, 2024, Dasydorylas Skevington, 2001 (Pipunculidae, Tomosvaryellini) of Colombia, with description of three new species and a key to Neotropical males, European Journal of Taxonomy 932, pp. 138-157 : 153-154

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2024.932.2517

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1137F37F-AF51-44E2-8D3E-3C68992029A5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11127172

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE8793-803A-8055-FF4F-82DDFA9EFB71

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Dasydorylas
status

 

Key to males of the Neotropical species of Dasydorylas View in CoL

1. Postpedicel with acuminate apex ( Fig. 29 View Figs 27–39 ); vein M 1 slightly straight or clearly straight ( Fig. 31 View Figs 27–39 ) ........................................................................................................................................................... 2

– Postpedicel with aristiform apex ( Figs 3 View Figs 1–13 , 16 View Figs 14–26 , 42 View Figs 40–52 ); vein M 1 slightly to clearly upward curved ( Figs 5 View Figs 1–13 , 18 View Figs 14–26 , 44 View Figs 40–52 ) ............................................................................................................................................... 7

2. Phallus bifid [fig. 36 in Rafael & Ale-Rocha (2004)] ................................ D. vulcanus Rafael, 2004 View in CoL

– Phallus trifid [ Figs 12 View Figs 1–13 , 25 View Figs 14–26 , 51 View Figs 40–52 ) .......................................................................................................... 3

3. Both surstyli with bases slightly thicker than apices [fig. 25 in Rafael (1991)]; third costal section subequal in length to fourth [fig. 39 in Rafael (1991)] ............................... D. regalis ( Rafael, 1991)

– Both surstyli with bases clearly thicker than apices ( Fig. 34 View Figs 27–39 ); third costal section slightly longer than fourth ( Fig. 31 View Figs 27–39 ) .................................................................................................................................. 4

4. Left surstylus left-directed and right surstylus directed clearly downwards, when seen in frontal view [fig. 35c in Hardy (1943)] ........................................................................... D. cinctus ( Banks, 1915)

– Both surstyli slightly sideways-directed [fig. 100 in Rafael (1995)] or clearly sideways-directed ( Fig. 34 View Figs 27–39 ) ............................................................................................................................................ 5

5. Phallic guide with a tuft of small setae dorsally [fig. 101 in Rafael (1995)]; junction of ventral and frontal margin forming an angle of about 110° [fig. 101 in Rafael (1995)]; phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts not distinctly separated [fig. 101 in Rafael (1995)] ..................................................... ................................................................................................................ D. nigripedes ( Hardy, 1954)

– Phallic guide without tuft of setae dorsally ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ); junction of ventral and frontal margin of phallic guide curved, not forming an angle ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ); phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal seventh ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ) ......................................................................................................... 6

6. Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with outer margins sinuous not forming an angle [fig. 54 in Rafael (1995)]; phallic guide with dorsal margin curved upward in distal half [fig. 54 in Rafael (1995)] ............................................................................ D. eremita ( Hardy, 1954)

– Both surstyli with basal half thickened and distal half thin, with outer margin forming an angle ( Fig. 34 View Figs 27–39 ); phallic guide straight, slightly curved upward only in distal third ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ) ...................... ................................................................................................................... D. nigellus ( Rafael, 1991)

7. Both surstyli more thickened medially than basally and apically, with inner margins sinuous ( Fig. 47 View Figs 40–52 ); phallic guide with upper margin straight and a tuft of small setae basally ( Fig. 51 View Figs 40–52 ) .......... .................................................................................................................. D. santainesensis sp. nov.

– Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins straight and outer margins curved ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–13 , 21 View Figs 14–26 ); phallic guide with upper margin sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally ( Fig. 12 View Figs 1–13 ) or with stout and rigid lobe dorsally ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ) ................................................................... 8

8. Both surstyli with acute apex ( Fig 8 View Figs 1–13 ); phallic guide with upper margins sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally ( Fig. 12 View Figs 1–13 ); phallus trifid with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal quarter ......................................................................................................... D. colombiensis sp. nov.

– Left surstylus with rounded apex, right surstylus with truncated apex ( Fig. 21 View Figs 14–26 ); phallic guide with a stout and rigid lobe dorsally ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ); phallus trifid with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal ninths ........................................................................................................ D. gibber sp. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Pipunculidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) CoL Data Package (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF