Dasydorylas, Skevington, 2001

Ramos-Pastrana, Yardany, Marques, Dayse Willkenia A. & Rafael, José Albertino, 2024, Dasydorylas Skevington, 2001 (Pipunculidae, Tomosvaryellini) of Colombia, with description of three new species and a key to Neotropical males, European Journal of Taxonomy 932, pp. 138-157 : 153-154

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.932.2517

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1137F37F-AF51-44E2-8D3E-3C68992029A5

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11127172

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE8793-803A-8055-FF4F-82DDFA9EFB71

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Dasydorylas
status

 

Key to males of the Neotropical species of Dasydorylas View in CoL

1. Postpedicel with acuminate apex ( Fig. 29 View Figs 27–39 ); vein M 1 slightly straight or clearly straight ( Fig. 31 View Figs 27–39 ) ........................................................................................................................................................... 2

– Postpedicel with aristiform apex ( Figs 3 View Figs 1–13 , 16 View Figs 14–26 , 42 View Figs 40–52 ); vein M 1 slightly to clearly upward curved ( Figs 5 View Figs 1–13 , 18 View Figs 14–26 , 44 View Figs 40–52 ) ............................................................................................................................................... 7

2. Phallus bifid [fig. 36 in Rafael & Ale-Rocha (2004)] ................................ D. vulcanus Rafael, 2004 View in CoL

– Phallus trifid [ Figs 12 View Figs 1–13 , 25 View Figs 14–26 , 51 View Figs 40–52 ) .......................................................................................................... 3

3. Both surstyli with bases slightly thicker than apices [fig. 25 in Rafael (1991)]; third costal section subequal in length to fourth [fig. 39 in Rafael (1991)] ............................... D. regalis ( Rafael, 1991)

– Both surstyli with bases clearly thicker than apices ( Fig. 34 View Figs 27–39 ); third costal section slightly longer than fourth ( Fig. 31 View Figs 27–39 ) .................................................................................................................................. 4

4. Left surstylus left-directed and right surstylus directed clearly downwards, when seen in frontal view [fig. 35c in Hardy (1943)] ........................................................................... D. cinctus ( Banks, 1915)

– Both surstyli slightly sideways-directed [fig. 100 in Rafael (1995)] or clearly sideways-directed ( Fig. 34 View Figs 27–39 ) ............................................................................................................................................ 5

5. Phallic guide with a tuft of small setae dorsally [fig. 101 in Rafael (1995)]; junction of ventral and frontal margin forming an angle of about 110° [fig. 101 in Rafael (1995)]; phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts not distinctly separated [fig. 101 in Rafael (1995)] ..................................................... ................................................................................................................ D. nigripedes ( Hardy, 1954)

– Phallic guide without tuft of setae dorsally ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ); junction of ventral and frontal margin of phallic guide curved, not forming an angle ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ); phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal seventh ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ) ......................................................................................................... 6

6. Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with outer margins sinuous not forming an angle [fig. 54 in Rafael (1995)]; phallic guide with dorsal margin curved upward in distal half [fig. 54 in Rafael (1995)] ............................................................................ D. eremita ( Hardy, 1954)

– Both surstyli with basal half thickened and distal half thin, with outer margin forming an angle ( Fig. 34 View Figs 27–39 ); phallic guide straight, slightly curved upward only in distal third ( Fig. 38 View Figs 27–39 ) ...................... ................................................................................................................... D. nigellus ( Rafael, 1991)

7. Both surstyli more thickened medially than basally and apically, with inner margins sinuous ( Fig. 47 View Figs 40–52 ); phallic guide with upper margin straight and a tuft of small setae basally ( Fig. 51 View Figs 40–52 ) .......... .................................................................................................................. D. santainesensis sp. nov.

– Both surstyli thickened basally and medially, thin apically, with inner margins straight and outer margins curved ( Figs 8 View Figs 1–13 , 21 View Figs 14–26 ); phallic guide with upper margin sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally ( Fig. 12 View Figs 1–13 ) or with stout and rigid lobe dorsally ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ) ................................................................... 8

8. Both surstyli with acute apex ( Fig 8 View Figs 1–13 ); phallic guide with upper margins sinuous and a tuft of small setae centrally ( Fig. 12 View Figs 1–13 ); phallus trifid with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal quarter ......................................................................................................... D. colombiensis sp. nov.

– Left surstylus with rounded apex, right surstylus with truncated apex ( Fig. 21 View Figs 14–26 ); phallic guide with a stout and rigid lobe dorsally ( Fig. 25 View Figs 14–26 ); phallus trifid with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated only in distal ninths ........................................................................................................ D. gibber sp. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Pipunculidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF