Proamphiporus kaimeiae, Hookabe & Tsuchida & Fujiwara & Kajihara, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.12782/specdiv.25.183 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:71D0D145-2CE7-4592-BD82-C67EAA0A41E5 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F4D2030D-4E14-4368-ACEF-24536A7EC840 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F4D2030D-4E14-4368-ACEF-24536A7EC840 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Proamphiporus kaimeiae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Proamphiporus kaimeiae View in CoL sp. nov.
[New Japanese name: Kaimei-fukamizo-himomushi] ( Figs 2 View Fig , 3 View Fig )
Material examined. Holotype: ICHUM 6058 View Materials , male, transverse sections of anterior body fragment, 6 slides, 19 July 2019, collected at a depth of 262 m, off Ofunato , Japan.
verse line in front of brain ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). Paired cerebral ganglia visible through body wall as orange spots ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). No eyes evident.
Internal morphology. Epidermis 20–40 µm in thickness, containing numerous red and yellow staining ciliated cells ( Fig. 3A View Fig ). Dermis up to 10–15 µm thick. Outer circular muscle layer of body wall 10–20 µm in thickness. Inner longitudinal muscle layer of body wall 50 µm in maximum thickness. Esophagus with ciliated epithelium. Stomach epithelium with glands and cilia. Intestinal diverticula deeply branched ( Fig. 2B View Fig ). Mid-dorsal vessel penetrating rhynchocoel wall behind ventral cerebral commissure, forming single vascular plug ( Fig. 3D View Fig ).
Proboscis pore terminal. Rhynchocoel long, more than two-thirds of body length, with thin wall comprised of few muscle layers ( Fig. 3B, D View Fig ). Proboscis with outer circular, middle longitudinal, and inner circular muscle layers ( Fig. 3E View Fig ); proboscis epithelium with developed papillae containing basophilic glandular cells ( Fig. 3B, D, E View Fig ); ten proboscis nerves ( Fig. 3E View Fig ). Lateral nerves with neither accessory nerves nor neurocords ( Fig. 3G View Fig ). Cerebral organs entirely situated alongside brain region, with forked chamber; chamber bifurcating into an anterior radial and a posterior lateral canal, both ciliated ( Fig. 3B, C View Fig ); acidophilic glands developed in posterior region of cerebral organs ( Fig. 3C View Fig ). Eyes absent. Testes between intestinal diverticula ( Fig. 3F View Fig ). Gonoducts and gonopores not found. Execratory collecting tubules near lateral nerve in pyloric region ( Fig. 3G View Fig ).
Etymology. The specific name is after the R/V Kaimei, during a research cruise of which the holotype was sampled.
Type locality and distribution. At present known only from the type locality, off Ofunato , Iwate Prefecture, Tohoku, Japan, at a depth of 262 m .
Remarks. The cerebral organs in Proamphiporus kaimeiae sp. nov. are situated alongside the brain region behind the proboscis insertion, which accords with the generic diagnosis for Proamphiporus ( Chernyshev and Polyakova 2019) . The external appearance of P. kaimeiae sp. nov. is quite similar to that of P. rectangulus ; however, they can be differentiated by a depigmented mid-dorsal stripe on the dorsal body surface in P. rectangulus but absent in P. kaimeiae . Proamphiporus kaimeiae differs from P. crandalli by having brown pigments on the dorsal surface.
Phylogeny and genetic distance. The resulting tree topology differed between ML ( Fig. 4A View Fig ) and BI ( Fig. 4B View Fig ), which is likely due to the lack of gene markers other than COI in P. rectangulus . In both of the analyses, P. kaimeiae formed a clade along with P. crandalli and P. rectangulus with full support values, corroborating the generic placement of the new species as well as the nominal species Amphiporus rectangulus .
The interspecific genetic distances based on COI partial sequences ( Table 2) were 14.1% in p -distance and 15.8% in K2P between P. kaimeiae and P. crandalli , while 13.3–13.5% in p -distance and 14.9% in K2P between P. kaimeiae and P. rectangulus . These values are comparable with 10.4–10.7% in p -distance and 11.2–11.6% in K2P between P. crandali and P. rectangulus , and the interspecific COI divergences for Hoplonemertea suggested in Sundberg et al. (2016).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.