Astroglypha, Mah, 2021

Mah, Christopher L., 2021, The East Pacific / South Pacific Boundary: New taxa and occurrences from Rapa Nui (Easter Island), New Caledonia and adjacent regions, Zootaxa 4980 (3), pp. 401-450 : 418-419

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4980.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1FCA8AC-A984-4547-8A05-F1993BDAEE7C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5041268

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC8790-033B-3918-C5BA-43A77EF1AFF2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Astroglypha
status

gen. nov.

Astroglypha n. gen.

Etymology. The genus is composed of the Greek “ Astron ” for star and the Greek “glypho” for “carved or engraved” alluding to the very sculpted appearance of both species.

Diagnosis. Body petaloid with short, blunt, arms. Disk and arm ossicles enlarged, convex and blocky forming three distinct series with carinal and superomarginal plates visible along each arm. Disk plates enlarged and blocky. Surface covered by continuous granulation. Adambulacral spines one or two. Large flattened bullet-shaped subambulacral spine present.

Type species. Tamaria pyramidata Mah n. sp.

Taxonomic Comments. Tamaria passiflora View in CoL and the new species of Astroglypha n. gen. fall outside the historical Tamaria View in CoL concept as outlined by H.L. Clark (1921) and are herein assigned to the new genus Astroglypha . The Ophidiasteridae View in CoL has recently undergone re-evaluation following molecular data ( Mah & Foltz 2011) showing genera such as Fromia View in CoL and Neoferdina View in CoL to be members of the Goniasteridae View in CoL . Mah (2017) examined the paraphyletic Ophidiasteridae View in CoL and attempted to establish morphological boundaries for ophidiasterid-like Goniasteridae View in CoL and more typological Ophidiasteridae View in CoL , such as Ophidiaster View in CoL or Linckia View in CoL .

Tamaria View in CoL has been historically defined on the basis of six serial papular rows contingent on the absence of actinal papulae, as compared with Ophidiaster (H.L. Clark, 1921) View in CoL . However, in spite of the difference in papular rows, Tamaria View in CoL , in Clark’s original (1921) definition shares more characters with more typological ophidiasterids, such as Ophidiaster (sensu Mah 2017) View in CoL , such as the cylindrical arms, small disk and marginal and abactinal plate arrangement.

Tamaria passiflora View in CoL was described by Downey (1971) with four papular rows as well as a more strongly developed skeleton, petaloid-shaped, shorter arms and a more weakly stellate body (R/r = approximately 3.0–4.0 versus 4.0–7.0 in spp. more similar to the type species) and large blocky marginal and disk ossicles. These features are inconsistent with characters identifying the traditional Tamaria View in CoL concept as outlined by H.L. Clark (1921). Thus, it is argued that Tamaria passiflora View in CoL and the species described herein should be separated as part of the new genus, Astroglypha . Clark & Downey (1992: 284) further discussed this species’ unusual morphology and agreed that “perhaps deserves to be removed to a new genus, on the basis of its single row of large abactinal plates, its irregular arrangement of actinal plates, two series of subambulacral spines, minute terminal plates and short, heavy petaloid arms.”

Astroglypha n. gen. within the Ophidiasteridae View in CoL . Astroglypha n. gen. is provisionally placed within the Ophidiasteridae View in CoL but further testing of affinities is encouraged. Most of the genera included in the Ophidiasteridae View in CoL display characters which strongly support the more traditional ophidiasterid morphology. Hacelia View in CoL , Heteronardoa View in CoL , Linckia View in CoL , Ophidiaster View in CoL , and Tamaria View in CoL display characters with cylindrical arms, small disk, granular coverings and show abactinal and marginal plates which are identical in appearance.

The newly described Astroglypha lacks morphological characters seen in other Ophidiasteridae View in CoL , including having shorter arms, blockier abactinal and marginal plates and arms which are more angular in shape and angular rather than round in cross-section. However, marginal and abactinal plates are similar in appearance and the surface is covered by granules as is the case in other ophidiasterids. Thus, based on these characters, Astroglypha n. gen. is retained within the Ophidiasteridae View in CoL . However, the morphology is otherwise highly divergent from the other known genera within the family with the possible exception of Bunaster View in CoL , which displays similarly arranged abactinal and marginal plates ( Marsh 1999). Blake (2018: 60) illustrated skeletal similarities between Astroglypha (formerly Tamaria View in CoL ) passiflora View in CoL and Paleozoic Asteroidea View in CoL , notably the Ordovician Hudsonaster and Macroporaster . In situ observation of Astroglypha passiflora in the tropical Atlantic ( Fig. 8F View FIGURE 8 ) suggest this morphology could be associated with predation on sponges.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF