Ancylosis rhodochrella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1852)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4822.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4329F798-9591-4711-88E7-3B9EE1C8864D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4458045 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CB87DC-FFE6-7E4B-FF52-174DFC95FE7A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ancylosis rhodochrella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1852) |
status |
|
Ancylosis rhodochrella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1852) View in CoL
Figs 58 View FIGURES 44–58 , 65 View FIGURES 59–66
Myelois rhodochrella Herrich-Schäffer, 1852 — Systematische Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, pl. 21, fig. 151 (vol. 4, 1852), p. 147 (vol. 6, 1855). TL: Amasia, Turkey.
Type material examined. Holotype of rhodochrella : ♀, “ Amasia, coll Lederer” | “GP 1791 FS 2017” [ František Slamka ] ( MfN).
Additional material examined. Spain: 1 ♀, Mardin ( SMNK) . Russia: 8 ♂, 1 ♀, Orenburg reg., Akbulak distr., Pokrovka vill., 16.vi.2019 ; 1 ♂, Volgograd reg., Kletsk distr., Savushkin 3 km W, 2.vi.2016 (all ET) . Georgia : 1 ♂, Caucasus Tiflis E. Koenig; 1 ♀, Eldar, po Iop Sitnah. u., Tifl. g. Mlokospv. 25.v.96 ; 1 ♀, Eldar , coll. Grand Duke Nikolai Mikhailovich; 1 ex (abdomen missing), Nasar lebi, coll. Grand Duke Nikolai Mikhailovich. Turkey: 1 ♀, Pont, coll. Wocke ; 2 ♂, 1 ♀, Pontus; 1 ♂, Pont , coll. Erschov (all ZIN) ; 1 ♀, Asia minor, Tuz Gölli, Nordufer , 20.vii.1970 (Friedel) (gen. slide 94/19, O. Bidzilya) ( SMNK) .
Remarks. Myelois rhodochrella was described based on single female from Amasia ( Turkey). Two specimens (male and female) from Amasia bear the labels “coll. Lederer” (coll. MfN), but they are not designated as “types”. We suggest a holotype is a female in accordance to Herrich-Schäffer’s description. The Roesler’s designation (1973: 424) a male from Lambese [ Algeria] as type of M. rhodochrella is incorrect. The species was recently re-diagnosed and the genitalia of both sexes were illustrated ( Bidzilya et al. 2019: 451, figs 22, 31a, 32b, 45, 71).
Distribution. The species is known with certainty from Spain, Algeria, Russia (Volgograd and Orenburg regions), Georgia (first record), Turkey and Iran ( Roesler 1973).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Phycitinae |
Genus |